This paper presents a critical appraisal of published literature on the effectiveness of cochlear implantation at a younger age compared to an older age in infants and young children with hearing loss. Drawing on systematic reviews published between January 1996 and December 2006, the appraisal finds that implantation before 24 months generally improves audiological performance and communication outcomes. However, evidence for long-term outcomes such as educational achievement and quality of life remains limited. The paper also considers clinical implications, the limitations of existing study designs, and the need for individualized assessment before implantation is recommended.
This paper presents a critical appraisal of published literature on the effectiveness of cochlear implantation at a younger age compared to an older age in infants and young children with hearing loss. The literature reviewed consisted of original articles published between January 1996 and December 2006, sourced from major bibliographic and review databases as well as secondary sources, covering both published and recorded works in the English language.
Generally, implantation at a younger age improves the effectiveness of cochlear implantation in terms of audiological performance and communication outcomes. This is especially clear when cochlear implantation occurs before the age of 24 months, which has been shown to be more effective than implantation after 24 months.
It is not yet clear whether implantation before the age of 12 months improves effectiveness compared to implantation after 12 months of age. Given the relatively short period during which implantation has been used in large numbers of infants and young children under two years of age, evidence of increased effectiveness is available for short-term outcomes — such as communication skills — and has only been observed up to five to eight years post-implantation.
"Gaps in evidence for educational and life outcomes"
"Recommendations and cautions for clinical decision-making"
"Why randomized trials are impractical in this context"
You’re 32% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.