This paper reviews the cognitive effects of brain injury and disease, drawing on published clinical and neurological research. It examines how injuries to specific neuroanatomical structures produce impairments in attention, processing speed, memory, and executive function. The review explains the neurological bases for each cognitive domain, describes how different types of injury disrupt corresponding neural networks, and outlines appropriate assessment tools for clinicians. It also addresses the co-occurrence of these impairments and their impact on functional independence and quality of life for survivors and their families. The paper concludes by situating cognitive sequelae within the broader continuum from disorders of consciousness to higher-level cognitive dysfunction.
The paper demonstrates effective use of a literature review structure to synthesize multiple sources into a coherent clinical narrative. Rather than simply summarizing individual studies, it integrates neuroanatomical explanations with epidemiological findings to build cumulative arguments about why specific impairments develop after brain injury. This synthesis technique — moving from mechanism to manifestation to measurement — is a model approach for health science literature reviews.
The paper opens with a clinical rationale and a brief literature review methodology, then transitions into a detailed survey of cognitive domains. Three central sections address attention and processing speed, memory, and executive function respectively, each following a parallel internal structure: definition of the cognitive domain, neuroanatomical basis, vulnerability to injury, clinical presentation, and recommended assessment. The conclusion ties the domains together within a continuum-of-impairment framework.
The care of patients with brain injury and disease has improved substantially over the last thirty years. Nonetheless, the acute cognitive effects caused by brain injury remain a significant problem for survivors. Such impairments are substantial contributors to functional disability after brain injury and reduce quality of life for affected persons and their families (Schultza, Cifub, McNamea, Nicholsb, & Carneb, 2011). Accordingly, it is important for clinicians providing care to persons with brain injury to be familiar with the cognitive sequelae of such injuries, their neuropathophysiologic bases, the treatment options that may alleviate such problems, and their effects on functional ability and quality of life.
The anatomy, pathophysiology, and cognitive sequelae of brain injury and disease vary as a function of the cause of injury. Identification of the specific cause of injury and other relevant factors — such as age, injury severity, and comorbid conditions — is needed to understand the cognitive sequelae of brain injury. For survivors of severe brain injury, 30–60% will develop persistent cognitive, behavioral, and/or other neurological problems (Howard, Holmes, & Koutroumanidis, 2011).
These problems may be functionally debilitating and severely affect quality of life for patients and their families. Common elementary neurological impairments include parkinsonism, dystonia, chorea, tremor, tics, athetosis, seizures, and myoclonic syndromes (Schultza et al., 2011). Cognitive impairments include disturbances of arousal (e.g., coma, vegetative states), awareness and attention (e.g., minimally conscious state, delirium), and higher-level cognitive functions — most commonly disturbances of processing speed, memory, and executive function. Additionally, as many as 35% of individuals experience depression within the first three months following brain injury, and more than 30% are depressed at 12 months post-injury (Howard et al., 2011).
Cognitive impairment is among the more fully characterized neurobehavioral sequelae of brain injury, and one that neurologists and neuro-rehabilitation specialists are frequently asked to evaluate, manage, and provide prognosis for — both in the early post-resuscitation period and thereafter. The present work reviews and summarizes the literature describing cognitive impairments due to brain injury, drawing on studies published and indexed in Medline/PubMed (Schultza et al., 2011).
Among patients whose injury severity permits recovery to a level above the minimally conscious state (MCS), a variety of cognitive impairments may develop and produce substantial interference with functional independence and quality of life (Aaro, Smedler, Leis, & Emanuelson, 2009). The cognitive effects of brain injury — including attention, speed of processing, memory, and executive function — are discussed in the sections below.
Although the word "attention" is often used as if it referred to a unitary cognitive function, attention actually denotes a collection of interrelated processes that detect, select, and sustain focus on one or more external or internal stimuli. Included in this set of processes are: cortical orientation, the process by which primary sensory cortices detect novel stimuli; selective attention, which refers to the selection from among the many sensory events processed simultaneously in the brain of the one that will be admitted into consciousness for further processing; sustained attention (also referred to as concentration or vigilance), which refers to the maintenance of attention on a selected target; and divided attention, which refers to the selection and sustained processing of two or more stimuli simultaneously (Aaro et al., 2009).
Working memory is closely related to attentional processes and involves the temporary maintenance and manipulation of information "off-line" — that is, keeping one or a small set of words, numbers, images, or sounds "in mind" briefly after they are presented. Closely related to attention is processing speed, which refers to the rate at which information is processed in the brain and is manifested clinically as reaction time or response latency. Attention and processing speed are supported by several large-scale, selectively distributed networks. These networks include: primary and secondary sensory cortical areas; tertiary (heteromodal parietal) cortical areas cross-linking information between primary and secondary sensory cortices; quaternary (heteromodal frontal) cortical areas that elaborate, organize, modulate, and permit interpretation of information processed elsewhere; the frontal-subcortical circuits required for higher-level attentional processing and working memory; and multiple white matter bundles connecting the cortical-cortical and cortical-subcortical areas comprising these networks (Piros et al., 2012).
Injury to any of these areas may affect attention and processing speed. In general, injury to or dysfunction of cortical areas disrupts one or more aspects of attention, whereas injury to or dysfunction of white matter or subcortical elements impairs processing speed. Impairments of attention (and particularly vigilance) and processing speed are observed commonly among survivors of brain injury in both the recent and remote post-injury periods.
These impairments most likely reflect a combination of several forms of neural damage, including laminar necrosis (ischemic injury to cortical layers 3, 4, and 5), damage to white matter at the zones between the major cerebral artery territories, and damage to white matter and subcortical structures supplied by the distal branches of deep and superficial penetrating vessels. Additionally, involvement of superior brainstem and cerebellar structures — whether gray or white matter — may also contribute to these impairments (Piros et al., 2012).
Attention and processing speed impairments may be qualitatively apparent during patient interview and examination, particularly among persons with severe brain injury, but are not quantitatively assessed by many commonly used bedside cognitive screening tools, including the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Since the anatomy of brain injury predicts attention and processing speed impairments, and since studies including metrics of these cognitive functions usually identify problems in this population, the evaluation of persons with brain injury requires the use of vigilance or cancellation tasks, continuous performance tasks, or other tests of attention and processing speed — such as the Trail Making Test or the Test of Everyday Attention (Piros et al., 2012).
Persistent cognitive impairments after brain injury and brain disease contribute to functional limitations and affect quality of life. Cognitive impairment is a significant problem for many survivors of brain injury and disease. At the severe end of the continuum of cognitive impairment are the disorders of consciousness, including coma, vegetative states, and the minimally conscious state. These are sometimes persistent — and occasionally permanent — disorders with complex medical, social, and legal considerations that must be addressed by clinicians and the families of affected patients.
You’re 35% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.