This paper analyzes three primary texts from early colonial American history: John Winthrop's "A Model of Christian Charity," a frontier planters' petition against Native Americans addressed to Judge William Barkly, and Nathaniel Bacon's account of Bacon's Rebellion. Through close reading and historical contextualization, the paper examines how colonial writers used religious and political rhetoric to rationalize social inequality and violence toward Native Americans. The analysis considers Winthrop's apparent discomfort with societal inequality, the reliability of the planters' petition given known colonial-Native tensions, and Bacon's use of religious justification to legitimize aggression against Indigenous peoples.
The following analysis examines three primary texts from early colonial American history, each offering a distinct window into the rhetoric, anxieties, and justifications of colonial writers.
Although John Winthrop's "A Model of Christian Charity" suggests that God has many reasons for setting some apart as wealthy and others as poor, his reasoning seems more like an attempt to reassure himself than to convince others of a truth he firmly holds. This can be seen in his invocation of God in the first sentence, which appears to suggest his own insufficiency rather than confident belief.
Furthermore, Winthrop consoles himself by stating that no person is inherently better or wealthier than another, appealing to a common human need, and that such inequality exists only for the glory of God — not for the elevation of mankind. Finally, his discussion of God's law as a mediator of this social condition suggests he is not fully satisfied with that condition. While it cannot be assumed that Winthrop's essay questions his faith outright, the text clearly suggests that he is uncomfortable with the inequality of society and seeks to rationalize it through theological argument.
In this petition, addressed to Judge William Barkly, the Indians' actions are described as barbaric and horrific. The petitioners claim that Native Americans have burned some colonists alive, killed others, and are terrorizing the wider community. The tone of the piece is desperate, suggesting that the villagers are in urgent need of relief.
However, one must carefully consider the context of the petition. Given what is known today about Native American and colonial relations, it is worth questioning whether the grievances described in the petition are hyperbolized. Were the colonists similarly inflicting violence upon the Native Americans? Did they seek to form a militia primarily to rid the area of people they viewed as unwanted, rather than out of genuine self-defense? Or were these communities truly being harmed and threatened by the Native population in this particular region? These questions complicate any straightforward reading of the petition.
"Bacon uses God and politics to justify anti-Native violence"
You’re 65% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.