This paper examines the forces underlying European colonialism beyond the conventional focus on racism. Drawing on the experiences of Portuguese, French, British, and other colonial powers from the 15th through the 20th century, it explores how religion, patriarchy, and economic interests shaped colonial policies and the transatlantic slave trade. The paper highlights how Portuguese Catholicism initially overrode racial distinctions, how patriarchal social structures governed intermarriage policies, and how expanding economic demands eventually entrenched racial hierarchies. It also addresses the lasting cultural and social damage inflicted on African and other colonized peoples through the imposition of European borders, religions, and identities.
Much of the conventional wisdom around slavery rightly centers on the issue of racism. To many Europeans, the darker skin and different culture of African peoples indicated the latter's inferiority and a lesser level of development. Many Europeans justified colonization on the idea of bringing civilization to what they called savage heathens. Others believed that the perceived inferiority of African races meant that slavery was a natural social order.
A closer look at the history of colonialism and slavery, however, reveals forces at work beyond racism. There were four distinct colonial periods from the 16th to the late 20th century, and the actions of colonial powers such as Portugal and Spain were not always explained simply by skin color.
This paper reflects on the other forces that underlay European colonization efforts. It examines the role played by patriarchy and religion in the colonial experience, and how the global economic forces spawned by colonialism in turn gave rise to the modern slave trade, turning people into nothing more than commodities and sources of labor.
The Portuguese system of colonialism emerged during the 15th century, as the Portuguese were among the earliest Europeans to visit Sub-Saharan Africa. At this time, colonialism was largely a coastal phenomenon, since the African continent presented formidable physical barriers. However, the early coastal stations were able to take advantage of a slave trade that had already existed even prior to the arrival of Europeans ("Sub-Saharan Africa: Colonial History").
Despite the harsh land and the prevalence of disease, the Portuguese established coastal settlements predominantly run by missionaries. These settlements served dual purposes. First, they acted as springboards for slave traders who took enslaved people from further inland. Second, they allowed missionaries to convert Africans to the Catholic faith.
For the Portuguese, Catholicism took precedence over skin color. African natives who professed the Catholic faith gained the rights and advantages of Portuguese citizenship. The Portuguese even mandated intermarriage between Portuguese settlers and native populations — a significant policy given that French and British colonizers had passed ordinances against the very same practice in their own colonies ("Sub-Saharan Africa: Colonial History").
It is important to note, however, that the mandate allowing intermarriage applied only to Portuguese males. In the prevailing European social system of the era, wives became the "property" of their husbands and their husbands' families upon marriage. The laws mandating intermarriage between Portuguese men and native women were built on this same patriarchal understanding. Upon marriage, the native women and any subsequent children would be considered Portuguese rather than African.
"Industrial demand entrenched racial hierarchy and mass slavery"
"Colonizers disrupted African cultures, borders, and migration routes"
"Ethnocentrism caused irreversible cultural and social damage"
You’re 43% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.