This paper examines colorism — discrimination based on skin tone — and its wide-ranging effects on individuals' daily lives, including disparities in the criminal justice system, workplace earnings, and romantic relationships. Drawing on empirical studies, the paper demonstrates how dark-skinned individuals face systematically worse outcomes than their light-skinned peers within the same racial or ethnic group. The conflict sociological perspective is applied to explain colorism's structural origins, tracing its roots to American slavery and the enduring power dynamics that privilege lighter skin tones. The paper concludes by proposing both micro-level family interventions and macro-level community strategies as pathways toward ending colorism.
Colorism is discrimination based on one's skin tone. It involves the preferential treatment of light-skinned people within a racial group at the expense of their dark-skinned peers (Viglione et al. 251). Fergus (as cited in Knight n.pag.) conducted a study on colorism using high school males of Puerto Rican and Mexican (Latino) origin. The study established that although the boys were all Latinos, those with white-looking skin received more favorable treatment both at the family and school levels — they were perceived as white — while their dark-skinned counterparts often suffered discrimination (Knight n.pag.). Colorism is thus manifested when people of the same ethnic group face different outcomes, different realities, and different expectations based solely on their skin tone.
Like racism, colorism disadvantages dark-skinned people, limiting their life chances and access to greater privileges. A study by Viglione et al. (256) on the effects of colorism in the criminal justice system found that dark-skinned Black women were twice as likely to receive the death penalty for crimes against white victims, and that, generally, darker-skinned people received longer prison sentences than their light-skinned counterparts. Darker-skinned men are also more likely to be labeled as criminals, more likely to be associated with aggression and violence, and more likely to be victims of discrimination than their light-skinned peers (Viglione et al. 251).
At the workplace, dark-skinned individuals are less likely to advance and will often earn less than their light-skinned counterparts (Viglione et al. 251). Studies have also shown that colorism affects marriage and romantic relationships. Dark-skinned women have a 15 percent higher probability of remaining unmarried than their light-skinned peers because society associates fair skin with status and beauty (Hamilton et al. 46).
The conflict sociological perspective best theorizes colorism. The conflict approach argues that society is characterized by inequalities in the distribution of resources based on age, race, gender, and class, which produces conflict between the majority and minority groups (Nickerson n.pag.). The powerful minority uses its resources and influence to develop structures that grant it advantages over the majority in the distribution of desired resources (Nickerson n.pag.). As a result, society exists in constant conflict as the majority strives to claim its fair share of the system, while the minority continuously develops new mechanisms to maintain control over available resources (Nickerson n.pag.).
"Traces colorism's origins to American slavery and power"
"Proposes micro and macro strategies to combat colorism"
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.