This paper examines Common Cause, a nonpartisan nonprofit advocacy organization founded in 1970, as a case study in American interest group politics. The paper begins by surveying the broader reasons why interest groups proliferate in the United States β including social complexity, ideological shifts, and government expansion β drawing on the disturbance and entrepreneurial theories of David Truman and Robert Salisbury. It then traces the founding and evolution of Common Cause, arguing that disturbance theory best explains its formation and growth. The paper also addresses Common Cause's key policy achievements, such as the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002, and responds to criticism that the organization is ideologically liberal.
An interest group is defined as any organization that seeks to influence public policy. Interest groups are rife within American politics because of the diversity of America, its democratic heritage, and the decline of a robust multiparty system. Interest groups do not arise spontaneously or automatically out of natural social processes. Rather, different social and political factors help explain the proliferation of interest groups during certain volatile periods of a nation's political life.
The Industrial Revolution and the abuses it spawned created the rise of organized labor in the West. In America specifically, government policy β such as the creation of farm subsidies during the New Deal β spawned farmers' lobbying groups. Ideological shifts within the American public created the "Religious Right" of the 1980s. The government's greater role in people's lives prompted consumer rights groups in the 1960s and 1970s to advocate for legislation protecting human health ("Interest Groups" 2007, The Social Studies Help Center).
According to David Truman and Robert Salisbury, one theory of why interest groups have increased in number points to the greater complexity of American society. This complexity has created social disturbance or imbalance, compelling groups to articulate long-ignored needs or to form associations that give politically cohesive voice to those who have lost social ground ("Interest Groups" 2007, The Social Studies Help Center).
One example of this, ironically, is that of the common voter. The common voter does not necessarily designate a numerically small group, but that does not prevent many ordinary people β those without strong ties to politicians or lobbying organizations β from feeling that the average person's voice has been lost in American political life.
The difficulty of making politicians ethical and responsive to issues rather than to dollars from other interest groups spawned the creation of Common Cause, a nonpartisan nonprofit advocacy organization founded in 1970. The 1960s and 1970s were a socially tumultuous era during which Americans felt the government was becoming increasingly dissociated from ordinary people's needs. Common Cause defines itself as "a vehicle for citizens to make their voices heard in the political process and to hold their elected leaders accountable to the public interest" ("About Us" 2007, Common Cause). Although it is itself a lobbying group, it dedicates itself to fighting against the influence of special interest lobbying groups that use money to push politicians to vote in ways antithetical to the needs of ordinary Americans.
One of Common Cause's most passionate and popular causes is campaign finance reform. Common Cause practices what it preaches β it is almost entirely funded by the often small, individual donations of its members. It is proud that one of the bills it promoted for many years was finally passed with substantial bipartisan support: the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002, described as "the most significant campaign reform bill in a generation, banning political parties from raising and spending soft money" ("About Us" 2007, Common Cause).
"How disturbance theory explains Common Cause's diverse membership"
"BCRA 2002 and Common Cause's landmark legislative wins"
"Rebutting claims of liberal bias with bipartisan evidence"
You’re 55% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.