This paper argues that continued U.S. military presence in Iraq is strategically unnecessary, financially costly, and ethically unjustifiable. Drawing on Institute for Policy Studies reports — including Phyllis Bennis' "Understanding the U.S.-Iraq Crisis" and "Paying the Price" — the paper examines the staggering human cost of the conflict on both sides, the rapid growth of the Iraqi insurgency, the disputed economic motives behind the invasion, and the collapse of the Bush administration's original justifications. The author concludes that, given the absence of weapons of mass destruction, the lack of a proven Iraq–September 11 connection, and declining public support, American troops should be withdrawn from Iraq as soon as possible.
The paper uses source integration effectively: rather than merely quoting documents, it contextualizes each piece of evidence within a broader political argument. The author names specific report sections (e.g., section nine of Bennis' report) and authors, modeling how to engage with primary and secondary sources in a policy argument essay.
The essay opens with a statistical overview of casualties to establish the human cost, then pivots to the insurgency's rapid growth as a strategic failure. The third section examines economic motives and the administration's rhetorical framing, while the final section ties together public opinion shifts and the collapse of the war's stated justifications to reinforce the withdrawal argument. Each paragraph builds logically on the last, creating a layered persuasive case.
The war in Iraq has become one of the most contentious political issues in recent years. Although many citizens of the United States originally supported sending troops to Iraq based on the possible presence of weapons of mass destruction, more and more people are crying out for the return of American troops. According to the Institute for Policy Studies and Foreign Policy (IPS) report entitled "Paying the Price," over 1,500 troops have been killed since the onset of the war, and over 11,300 have been wounded. Equally, if not more, startling are the casualties on the other side: approximately 24,000 Iraqi troops have been killed in battle, and an astounding 16,000 to 100,000 innocent civilians have also lost their lives to the conflict.
These horrific numbers suggest the potential futility of the war. Continued presence of American troops in Iraq is needless and costly — both in human lives and in taxpayer money. Even before reading through the IPS documents, including Phyllis Bennis' "Understanding the U.S.-Iraq Crisis," I held strong opinions against the war for practical, strategic, political, and humanitarian reasons. The IPS documents fuel those existing opinions further, and I firmly believe that American troops should be withdrawn from Iraq as soon as possible.
One of the main reasons to withdraw troops is the obvious strength of the Iraqi insurgency and the consequential loss of American lives. According to "Paying the Price," the insurgency soared in popularity between 2003 and 2004. In just one year, estimates rose from 5,000 fighters to 40,000 on the side of the insurgency. Essentially, the war has created hardened anti-American sentiments throughout Iraq and the rest of the Middle East. Rather than bolstering the American cause for freedom and democracy, the war has instead spawned further acts of terror and inspired increasing numbers of people to take up arms against the United States. Far from being viewed as "liberators," as the Bush administration would have us believe, Americans are often viewed as aggressors.
You’re 48% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.