This paper offers a comparative analysis of two landmark documentaries — Ken Burns' The Civil War (1990) and Morgan Spurlock's Super Size Me (2004) — as examples of expository and investigative documentary styles, respectively. The essay begins by situating documentary film within a broader cultural context, noting how accessible production and distribution tools have amplified the genre's influence. It then examines how each filmmaker balances factual information with emotional engagement: Burns through photographs, music, and dramatic readings; Spurlock through personal experience grounded in scientific testimony. The paper argues that both approaches successfully serve their audiences, albeit through distinct methods suited to their subject matter.
This study guide is drawn from PaperDue's library of 130,000+ paper examples across 47 subjects.
The paper demonstrates comparative textual analysis applied to non-fiction film. Rather than simply describing each documentary, the writer identifies a shared evaluative criterion — the balance of factual content and emotional resonance — and applies it consistently to both subjects. This allows the paper to build a coherent argument across two different examples rather than producing two separate, unrelated summaries.
The essay opens with a contextual introduction establishing documentary film's cultural relevance and power, anchored by the Kony 2012 example. It then introduces the central analytical concept — the balance of fact and human drama — before devoting one body section each to Burns and Spurlock. The final paragraph synthesizes the comparison with a pointed contrast. The structure is tight and well-proportioned for an undergraduate comparative essay of this length.
The role of documentary film in shaping and informing American culture has become increasingly apparent, especially over the last decade. The ability of nearly anyone to create and distribute documentaries cheaply and effectively — using home computer software and video-sharing sites like YouTube — has produced a diverse body of work available with the click of a button. Not all documentaries are accurate, and some may not even be ethically or legally sound, but when they are powerful and relevant enough, they can move people and even governments to act.
We have seen this recently with the independently produced documentary Kony 2012, a 29-minute film portraying the atrocities committed by Ugandan rebel leader Joseph Kony. Posted on YouTube in early March 2012, the film received over 100 million views in a single week and prompted renewed focus by the U.S. Congress to find and capture Kony.
Part of what makes documentaries so powerful is their unique mix of cold fact and human drama. A filmmaker's talent at balancing these two forces is often the secret behind a successful documentary. This balance can be difficult to achieve, however, in expository documentaries, where the focus is on offering accurate and thorough information in a way that still resonates emotionally with the viewer.
One compelling example of a successful expository documentary is Ken Burns' series The Civil War, which first aired on PBS in the fall of 1990. The film is unmistakably expository in nature — Burns aimed to present as much detail about the war as accurately as possible, with no apparent agenda beyond enlightening the viewer. Yet it was equally important to Burns that he present what he called the "emotional archaeology" of the war alongside the facts and figures (Burns 2002).
In order to portray this emotional landscape while remaining true to the expository format, Burns relied heavily on images, music, and dramatic readings to enliven the historical facts. Voiceovers of actors reading first-person accounts and letters from the war provide a poignant emotional backdrop to the major battles and casualty statistics. Still photographs from the period accompany the information throughout. The end product is a rich sensory tapestry that conveys both the information and the humanity behind it simultaneously.
You’re 53% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.