This paper examines the philosophical contributions of Étienne de Condillac, an 18th-century French empiricist, focusing on his proposal that sensation and language form the foundation of all human cognition. Drawing on Condillac's view that there are no innate ideas and that language transforms sensory experience into higher thought, the paper extends these principles to a critique of modern computing. It contrasts today's fact-processing machines with Condillac's model of experiential learning, arguing that truly intelligent artificial systems would need to move beyond programmed data toward genuine interpretation, meaning-making, and self-directed growth — mirroring the developmental arc Condillac described for human minds.
Étienne de Condillac was a French philosopher who was specifically interested in the philosophy of the mind. He lived during most of the 18th century, from 1715 to 1780, and was able to devote himself to his studies by becoming the Abbot of Mureau in France. He was certainly a product of his time, and as an early psychologist he helped bring newer insights to some of the other Enlightenment thinkers, among whom Locke and Voltaire are the most famous. As a product of his era, Condillac's works and thought exemplify 18th-century intellectual life: a lucid way of explaining cognition, brevity in writing (as opposed to the florid styles of the previous century), moderation in all things (reflecting a return to Aristotle), and an endless pursuit of logical method (Falkeintein, 2007).
From a philosophical point of view, Condillac believed language was the vehicle through which senses and emotions were transformed into higher cognitive thoughts, and that language reflected the structure of those thoughts in a definable manner. Since all knowledge comes from the senses and there are no real innate ideas, language becomes an expression of what humans perceive in their world. Similarly, economics is a logical outgrowth of those thoughts and supports the idea that human history is divided into two phases: progress and decline. During the progress phase, development is rational and the use of resources is robust, which encourages negative behavior from the privileged classes and promotes luxury until decline sets in, the masses arise, and the process begins again (Hergenhahn, 2005).
Condillac's Proposal holds that sensations are spread across a given space, even though they are not spatial. The only way to experience them is through sensation and feedback from those sensations. Similarly, sensation and emotion give rise to language, and their communication in the absence of immediate sensation is only viable once language has already been developed. A person may exist without language, but cannot be fully rational — language is both a social function of thought and feeling and an internal storage system for the relationships through which things are conceived. As Montgomery (1991, p. 192) writes: "In a state of total isolation the human being is dependent upon circumstance for whatever mental life he or she enjoys and is thus entirely a responsive or passive creature."
Since computers today are non-living, they must be programmed with knowledge in the form of facts. If we apply the analogy of a human who was somehow devoid of all experience — senses and all — then that human would have to be retaught everything in order to interpret the universe. Computers today are essentially supercharged calculators: they respond to programmed stimuli by taking a voluminous number of facts and processing them at extraordinary speeds (consider, for example, the computer Watson, which famously won on Jeopardy!). Yet that computer is not truly "thinking" — it is not bringing disparate facts together to form new sensations, new ideas, new creative works such as poems or music. Instead, its output is entirely based on facts that were input.
Future computers, however, and future efforts in artificial intelligence might allow networks to develop and grow — to adapt and form new thoughts and opinions about sensations experienced, rather than relying solely on rote information programmed in. Rather than making computers ever more advanced at performing more tasks at greater speed, the ideas behind Condillac's statue suggest a different goal: moving from a fact-based machine to one that does not just count, but interprets; not just finds patterns, but finds meaning in patterns; and takes conditions of ignorance or lack of knowledge and fills in the gaps without being explicitly programmed to do so (Teil & Latour, 1995).
This trajectory might also result in computers actively engaging in networking among themselves, developing and creating new systems, and acquiring a sense of "being" — such that they could engage with philosophical concepts of self, emotion, and the capacity to create something whose synergy exceeds the sum of its parts. In this sense, Condillac's insights about sensation, language, and the development of mind offer a surprisingly apt framework for evaluating not just historical cognition, but the future aspirations of machine intelligence.
"Computers as processors of programmed facts, not thinkers"
"Speculative AI that interprets, creates, and develops selfhood"
You’re 88% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.