Conflict Management in Business Communication
This paper examines conflict management within business communication, focusing on how effective communication can prevent and resolve workplace conflicts. It explores the role of human relations in organizational performance, strategies for building communication bridges during conflict, and how gender differences — including linguistic politeness, speech styles, interruption patterns, and biological processing differences — contribute to communication barriers. The paper also analyzes the Conflict Management System (CMS), critiquing its mechanistic, linear model of communication and evaluating its approach to conflict communication, purpose, control, and options. The paper concludes by emphasizing the importance of mutual understanding and effective communication in achieving constructive conflict resolution.
- Introduction: Human relations, conflict, and organizational performance
- Building Communication Bridges in Conflict: Communication strategies for resolving workplace conflicts
- Communication Barriers and Conflict: Gender: Gender differences in language, politeness, and interruption
- Effective Conflict Resolution Communication: Linear CMS model and conflict communication theory
- The Conflict Management System (CMS): Control and Options: CMS limitations in control, purpose, and conflict options
- Conclusion: Mutual understanding as the key to conflict resolution
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper moves logically from broad principles of human relations to specific communication barriers (gender) and then to a structured critique of the Conflict Management System, giving the argument a clear developmental arc.
- Gender communication differences are broken into well-defined subsections — politeness, speech styles, interruption, and biology — making a complex topic accessible and organized.
- The paper grounds its claims in named researchers and cited studies, giving the analysis academic credibility while remaining readable.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates effective use of framework critique: it introduces the Conflict Management System (CMS) as a dominant model, describes its assumptions (mechanistic, linear, sender-centred), and then systematically evaluates its limitations across four dimensions — communication, purpose, control, and options. This approach of presenting a framework and then interrogating it is a standard and persuasive move in organizational communication scholarship.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with an introduction to human relations in business, then addresses conflict communication strategies before pivoting to a detailed gender-focused analysis of communication barriers. The second half shifts to the theoretical CMS framework, examining it through four subsections. A brief conclusion synthesizes the argument around mutual understanding and information theory. The structure is largely descriptive-analytical, appropriate for an undergraduate survey paper on organizational communication.
Introduction
One of the most important determinants of success in any organization is the relationship between management and staff. Human relations in business is the process of building a strong workplace culture, training employees, and resolving conflicts between different parties in the workplace (Buddhodev Sinha, 2011). Simply put, it is a process that involves taking actions or making decisions that help employees feel as comfortable as possible. Understanding the different ways through which human relations can affect sustainability, profitability, competitiveness, and revenue can help improve organizational performance. However, it is important to note that issues will always arise where many people work together. It is how such issues are handled that will determine the success of a business. Furthermore, it has only been several decades since executives began putting effort into human relations, after recognizing its significant impact on organizational performance (Putnam, 2015).
Building Communication Bridges in Conflict
In organizations where many people work together, conflicts are bound to occur. Even the slightest actions or utterances can result in destructive behaviors or responses. When such conflicts emerge, it is the responsibility of management or human relations personnel to handle them properly. When conflicts are left unresolved for a long time, relationships between the opposing parties may be damaged. However, well-handled conflicts can contribute to deeper and stronger relationships and can help opposing sides work together more effectively toward achieving an organization's objectives. Proper communication skills are essential if conflicts are to be resolved effectively (Hener, 2010).
One of the most important communication skills is addressing only one concern at a time. Focusing on a single concern — and not introducing other concerns, even if related — can help find quick resolutions to workplace conflicts. Clearly specifying one issue to be addressed during a given time segment will also help avoid confusion during conflict resolution meetings. It is also important that meeting moderators caution the opposing sides against making accusations or leveling personal attacks against their opponents, as this will only create more distrust and animosity rather than yielding solutions (Aula & Siira, 2010; Siira, 2013). Effective listening — and making sure that the opposing parties truly listen to each other — is important because it helps build trust. It is also important for participants to use both verbal and non-verbal communication skills during reconciliation meetings. Moderators should make clear that the meeting's sole objective is to find solutions, not to assign blame.
References
Aula, P. & Siira, K. (2010). Organizational communication and conflict management systems: A social complexity approach. Nordicom Review, 31(1), pp. 125–141.
Buddhodev Sinha, A. (2011). Conflict management: Making life easier. The IUP Journal of Soft Skills, 5(4), pp. 31–43.
Finucane, M. L., Slovic, P., Mertz, C. K., Flynn, J., & Satterfield, T. A. (2000). Gender, race, and perceived risk: The 'white male' effect. Health, Risk & Society, 2(2).
Hener, G. (2010). Communication and conflict management in local public organizations. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, No. 30E/2010, pp. 132–141.
Keyton, J. (2011). Communication and organizational culture: A key to understanding work experience. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Moemeka, A. A. (2012). Communication and conflict in organizations: Revisiting the basics. Optimum, The Journal of Public Sector Management, 28(2), pp. 1–10.
Putnam, L. L. (September 2015). Communication and conflict resolution. Presentation to Advance Center.
Siira, K. (2013). Organizational conflict, conflict management, and communication: A social complexity perspective. Helsinki.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.