Workplace Conflict Mediation: The Nike Sexual Harassment Case
This paper examines the workplace conflict that erupted at Nike in 2018, when female employees organized an anonymous survey exposing widespread sexual harassment, gender discrimination, and toxic corporate culture. Using the Nike case as a primary example, the paper argues that professional mediation—conducted by an outside attorney or mediator representing the affected women—would have produced more equitable outcomes than the anonymous survey approach alone. The paper outlines the benefits of workplace mediation, including confidentiality, structured dialogue, and future-focused agreements, while also acknowledging its limitations, such as power imbalances and non-binding outcomes. A comparable hypothetical scenario involving a woman repeatedly passed over for promotion further illustrates when mediation is appropriate and when litigation may be necessary.
- Introduction: The #MeToo Era and Nike's Workplace Crisis: Situates Nike scandal within broader MeToo movement
- What Happened at Nike: Harassment, Marginalization, and the Anonymous Survey: Documents specific harassment and employee survey response
- The Case for Professional Mediation: Argues for outside mediator over anonymous survey approach
- Benefits of Mediation for Affected Employees: Outlines mediation advantages including confidentiality and empowerment
- Disadvantages of Mediation and How to Address Them: Acknowledges power imbalances and proposes practical solutions
- A Comparable Workplace Scenario: Hypothetical promotion-denial case tests mediation framework
- Litigation vs. Mediation: Choosing the Right Path: Weighs costs and benefits of litigation against mediation
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Grounds abstract mediation principles in a concrete, well-documented real-world case (Nike 2018), making the argument immediately accessible and persuasive.
- Balances advocacy with intellectual honesty by dedicating a full section to the disadvantages of mediation and proposing practical remedies for each weakness.
- Bridges the case study to a generalizable hypothetical scenario, demonstrating that the mediation framework applies beyond the Nike situation to everyday workplace disputes.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper uses a case-study-to-principle structure: it opens with specific documented events, extracts a policy recommendation (professional mediation), supports that recommendation with cited secondary literature on mediation theory, and then tests the recommendation against a constructed analogous scenario. This technique shows how real events can function as evidence for prescriptive arguments in applied ethics and human resources contexts.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens by situating the Nike conflict within the broader #MeToo moment, then narrates the specific harassment events and the anonymous survey response. It pivots to arguing for mediation, marshaling benefits from the literature before honestly cataloguing drawbacks. A created scenario extends the argument to a relatable individual case. The paper closes by weighing mediation against litigation and offering concrete preparation steps for both parties.
Introduction: The #MeToo Era and Nike's Workplace Crisis
It is difficult to discuss an employee dispute of recent times without thinking of the #TimesUp and #MeToo movements. While these movements have been most visible in Hollywood, they definitively impact women in every industry and workplace. More and more women are refusing to be silent when it comes to dealing with sexual harassment and related toxic behaviors in the workplace—and they should not have to be. This paper examines an instance of employee conflict that occurred not within the entertainment world, but within an adjacent industry—the lifestyle and sports apparel industry—concerning one of the giants in the field: Nike.
What Happened at Nike: Harassment, Marginalization, and the Anonymous Survey
The problems at Nike involved inappropriate behavior in the workplace, sexual harassment, and even sexual assault. Women within the company detailed workplace violations such as the following: "There were the staff outings that started at restaurants and ended at strip clubs. A supervisor who bragged about the condoms he carried in his backpack. A boss who tried to forcibly kiss a female subordinate, and another who referenced a staff member's breasts in an email to her. Then there were blunted career paths. Women were made to feel marginalized in meetings and were passed over for promotions" (Creswell et al., 2018). To make matters worse, in some divisions within Nike, women were not represented at all, and when they made complaints to human resources, no changes were implemented (Creswell et al., 2018).
The female members of staff at Nike engaged in an organized revolt via anonymous survey, inquiring whether each respondent had ever been victimized by sexual harassment or gender discrimination. The results of this anonymous survey ended up creating an overall coup within the executive ranks of the world's biggest sportswear and apparel firm. In the first week of March 2018, the packet of anonymous surveys ended up on the desk of Mark Parker, Nike's chief executive. The outcome was significant: many of the men in positions of power who had engaged in this toxic behavior ended up leaving the company or announcing their resignations (Creswell et al., 2018). This group included Trevor Edwards, the head of the Nike brand who was widely viewed as the most likely successor to Mark Parker upon his retirement, and Jayme Martin, Edwards's chief deputy (Creswell et al., 2018).
In the case of Nike, it is commendable that so many of the men who abused their power ultimately left their positions. However, upon reflection, one wonders whether there could have been another approach through which the female employees might have reaped a greater benefit, given the extent and duration of the abuse they suffered. While the anonymous surveys were beneficial and protected women from retaliation, it would have been more effective if this packet of surveys had been delivered by an attorney or mediator formally representing the women.
References
Benton, T. (2015, October 15). The advantages and disadvantages of mediation. Retrieved from https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/advantages-disadvantages-mediation-terri-benton
Creswell, J., Draper, K., & Abrams, R. (2018, April 28). At Nike, revolt led by women leads to exodus of male executives. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/28/business/nike-women.html
Dickinson, L. (2017, February 1). When mediation is the right approach to resolving workplace conflict. Worklogic. Retrieved from http://www.worklogic.com.au/workplace-mediations/mediation-right-approach-resolving-workplace-conflict/
Heathfield, S. M. (2004, July 10). Steps in mediating workplace conflict resolution. Retrieved from https://www.thebalancecareers.com/workplace-conflict-resolution-1918675
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.