This annotated bibliography surveys theoretical frameworks for understanding violence and conflict in contemporary society. It examines three major schools of conflict theory—Marxism, Parsonian conflict theory (Dahrendorf), and elite conflict theory (C. Wright Mills)—and their explanations of social violence. The paper also reviews Johann Galtung's foundational work on conflict phases and dynamics. By synthesizing these theoretical perspectives, the bibliography demonstrates how economic structures, social change, authority systems, and power distributions shape conflict emergence and resolution across different societies.
Violence has acquired several dimensions in contemporary society and has become one of the leading causes of human conflict spanning years and even decades. The quest to understand the main causes of violence is aimed ultimately at stopping its effects on communities and fostering greater peace within society. Various factors are responsible for the emergence of violence in contemporary society, and understanding these causes is essential for developing effective conflict resolution strategies.
Galtung's foundational work on conflict theory presents a well-researched analysis of violence and theoretical approaches to conflict resolution. Most notably, Galtung highlights the phases of violence through a distinction between concrete and abstract violence—two dimensions that characterize how violence manifests and progresses. His framework enables identification of the level or phase a particular conflict has reached. Galtung further discusses how to determine whether violence was repressed or resolved, emphasizing that violence can shift between phases depending on how it is managed. This dynamic understanding of conflict transitions provides a foundation for examining how different theoretical schools explain the persistence and resolution of social violence.
Multiple schools of thought attempt to explain conflict and violence within society. This bibliography highlights four major theoretical perspectives: the Marxist explanation of violence, Parsonian conflict theory developed by Ralf Dahrendorf, elite conflict theory articulated by C. Wright Mills, and foundational frameworks that help contextualize these approaches. Each school offers distinct mechanisms for understanding why conflicts emerge and how they develop within social structures.
Karl Marx's analysis of conflict centers on economic forces and social structure as fundamental causes of violence in society. Marx identifies the relations of production, human needs, capitalism, and class divisions as key drivers of antagonistic cooperation and social upheaval. His framework emphasizes how the division of labor and processes of social evolution create conditions for persistent conflict rooted in economic inequality.
However, the Marxist approach has significant limitations. Weininger argues that Marx's theory overlooks important forms of symbolic violence—non-material dimensions of domination that shape social relations but operate outside purely economic mechanisms. By drawing on Bourdieu's framework, Weininger contends that viewing violence solely as a product of economic and social order misses how cultural capital, status hierarchies, and normalized practices enforce social domination. This critical perspective reveals that while Marx provided crucial insights into class-based conflict, later scholars have expanded conflict theory to encompass mechanisms beyond material production.
The debate between Marxist and later conflict theorists is illuminated through comparative analysis. Marx's influence on subsequent conflict theorists, including Dahrendorf, demonstrates how foundational Marxist concepts were extended and revised. Both Marx and Dahrendorf recognized class as central to conflict, yet they diverged in their explanations of causation and in their understanding of whether conflict serves functional or destructive roles in society. These stepping stones established by Marx were developed further by later theorists seeking more comprehensive models of social conflict.
Ralf Dahrendorf's conflict theory attributes social conflict more directly to the aspect of social change, positing that every society undergoes conflict at any given point in history. Critically, Dahrendorf argues that conflict itself contributes to positive development and change within society—a perspective that views tension as potentially generative rather than purely destructive. This framework distinguishes between different categories of societies and examines how each experiences conflict and violence differently, as well as how resolution mechanisms vary across social types.
Authority and authority structures occupy a central place in Dahrendorf's analysis. Authority systems simultaneously contribute to both conflict emergence and conflict eradication, functioning as both sources of tension and mechanisms for resolution. In his view, the legitimacy and distribution of authority within institutions shapes whether conflict will escalate or be managed. This emphasis on institutional structures contrasts with Marxist focus on economic base, positioning social organization and authority hierarchies as primary conflict drivers.
Comparative analysis reveals the intellectual relationship between Marx and Dahrendorf. While Dahrendorf built upon Marxist insights regarding class formation, he departed significantly from Marx's materialist determinism. Both theorists recognized that structured inequality generates conflict, yet Dahrendorf emphasized the role of authority relations and institutional change more than pure economic relations. Their theoretical differences highlight how conflict scholarship evolved from production-centered to institutionally-centered explanations of social violence.
"Power concentration and institutional complexity"
You’re 71% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.