This paper examines the two primary frameworks for resolving contract disputes: administrative processes and judicial processes. It explains how administrative options such as mediation and arbitration offer cost-effective, timely alternatives to litigation, making them accessible to individuals and small businesses. The paper also outlines the characteristics of judicial dispute resolution, including its greater expense, time demands, and stress. It further discusses how contracts may be structured to require administrative processes before judicial remedies are pursued, and concludes by weighing the practical advantages and limitations of each approach in achieving fair, final resolutions for all contracting parties.
Contract dispute resolution is significant because there is always a chance that a problem will arise with a contract while it is in effect. When that happens, both administrative and judicial processes are available for addressing the dispute. These processes can be used to determine who is in the right and who is in the wrong, and by resolving a dispute carefully and properly, the remainder of the contract can often stay in effect while only the contested portion is modified. If modification is not possible, it may be necessary to nullify and void the contract in a manner that is satisfactory to both parties, or at least to the party that prevailed in the dispute.
If one or both parties breach a contract, dispute resolution becomes necessary to ensure that all parties are treated fairly and compensated appropriately for the performance they have provided under the contract's provisions (Lynch, 2001; Schwartz, 2010).
Administrative processes for contract dispute resolution include alternative dispute resolution (ADR) options such as mediation and arbitration (Schwartz, 2010). When a party uses administrative processes, that person or entity is seeking a way to address the dispute without going to court. This makes administrative processes fundamentally different from judicial ones. They can cost less, take less time, and be less burdensome when both parties are willing to consider changes and compromises.
The lower cost of administrative processes is particularly valuable for small companies and individuals who lack the financial resources to pursue litigation. There are many contracts created and disputed every year, and a significant number of them involve parties who could not afford to take their case to court if a problem arose (ABA, 2011).
With administrative tactics and processes, the parties to a contract can work with a mediator or arbitrator to ensure that both sides are treated fairly and that the dispute is resolved in a manner that all parties can accept (Lynch, 2001). There will always be a prevailing side in such disputes, but that does not mean one party receives everything it sought while the other receives nothing. Most administrative processes are designed to be fair and balanced, producing a better outcome for all involved parties.
When one factors in the lower costs and shorter timeframes associated with administrative dispute resolution, it becomes clear why these processes are so commonly used. The combination of accessibility, efficiency, and fairness makes administrative methods a practical first choice for many contracting parties facing disagreements.
"Court-based resolution, costs, and preparation requirements"
"How contracts order administrative then judicial processes"
Overall, there are many options when it comes to contract disputes and their successful resolutions. Sometimes, simply talking through the issues and agreeing amicably to modify the contract is enough. However, there is often animosity between contracting parties, and when matters cannot be worked out informally, a more structured process becomes necessary to achieve closure. That is where administrative and judicial contract dispute resolution come into play, as these mechanisms are more formal and produce definitive outcomes.
You’re 50% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.