This paper examines a corporate ombudsman's investigation into a shareholder's complaint of gender discrimination against the directors and officers of Goodly Corporation. Writing from the ombudsman's perspective, the author outlines the investigative process — reviewing records and interviewing witnesses — and evaluates whether any legal violations occurred. The paper concludes that while no outright legal corruption was found, the corporate directors were excluding a female shareholder from major decisions in a manner consistent with gender bias. The ombudsman recommends greater inclusion of women in corporate decision-making, drawing on broader trends in board diversity and industry-specific considerations such as targeting female consumers.
As a company ombudsman, it was my task to investigate complaints of wrongdoing on the part of corporate directors and officers. I had to decide whether there was a violation of the law and deal with the wrongdoers accordingly with respect to the shareholder of Goodly Corporation. I investigated the situation by reviewing recent records and interviewing workers who witnessed the corporate directors' and officers' behaviors in the workplace. From there, I had to maintain an unbiased perspective so that I could establish the facts and reach a clear conclusion.
Sometimes when there is an issue within a company, managers and employees cannot identify a solution on their own, and they need an outside party to determine whether one exists. Quite often there is no solution, and this must be conveyed to the group. This is not an easy task, but at least the group receives a clear answer. Usually, the group simply wants to understand the reasoning behind the answer and to feel assured that the decision-making process was sound. Other times the group may disagree with the answer and seek a different outcome. It is up to the ombudsman to try to resolve the issue to the best of their ability (Should Your Company Hire an Ombudsman to Rein in the Complaining, 2008). Therefore, the company needed to bring in an ombudsman to determine whether there was a solution to the dispute between the shareholder and the corporate directors and officers.
The shareholder felt that she was being discriminated against by corporate directors and officers because she is a woman. As I investigated, I found that the 21st century reflects a greater openness to diverse perspectives in corporate leadership. If stakeholders observe that a company's Board of Directors (BOD) consists entirely of men, they may take their investments and business elsewhere, as this composition can suggest the board is closed-minded and resistant to change. Furthermore, in industries such as cosmetics — which primarily target women — it makes practical sense to recruit female directors who can better understand the market (McMull, 2009). The shareholder always felt that the directors were not respecting her or other women in the company, and she approached the ombudsman so that her concerns could be heard and addressed.
As a result of my investigation, I found no direct evidence of corrupt or illegal conduct on the part of the corporate directors and officers. However, it became clear that the shareholder was being excluded from major company decisions in a manner that reflected gender bias. There was no formal wrongdoing in a strictly legal sense, but the pattern of exclusion was inconsistent with equitable corporate governance standards. Therefore, as ombudsman, I concluded that the directors and officers should include the shareholder more meaningfully in significant company decisions, and that greater respect for her perspective and position was warranted. This was the appropriate resolution given the evidence gathered through the investigation.
You’re 59% through this paper. Sign up to read the full paper.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.