This paper examines cultural diversity and its impact on organizational performance and management practices, with particular focus on Hofstede's Five Cultural Dimensions — Power Distance, Masculinity vs. Femininity, Individualism vs. Collectivism, Long-term vs. Short-term Orientation, and Uncertainty Avoidance. It also addresses criticisms of Hofstede's model by McSweeney and Kreiser et al. Using Thailand-based multinational Minor International as a case illustration, the paper analyzes how individual cultural backgrounds and diversity management programs influence employee turnover, communication, productivity, and innovation. Key challenges such as conflict management, resistance to change, and motivational strategies are also discussed.
Cultural diversity — often called multiculturalism — refers to the differences in cultural values, beliefs, religions, races, and other dimensions among individuals in a society, workplace, or country (Kandola, 2008). Cultural diversity is increasingly observed in societies and workplaces due to globalization and the movement of people from rural to urban areas in search of better employment opportunities and improved standards of living (Jackson, 2011).
Cultural diversity is largely seen in multinational organizations that set up business operations in foreign countries and hire individuals from those countries to meet their workforce requirements (Kandola, 2008). When multinational corporations (MNCs) expand their operations as part of their international growth strategies, they must hire individuals from target countries and neighboring regions (Oslond & Biid, 2000). These individuals differ from the local workforce with respect to their cultural values, race or color, religion, and social norms (Levy, Taylor, & Boyacigiller, 2010). Employees hired from the home country are called parent country nationals (PCNs) or expatriates (Seymen, 2006), while those recruited from the target country are called host country nationals (HCNs) (Sako, 2006).
If employees from the parent country and host country are insufficient to meet human capital requirements for an international assignment, the organization may also recruit from third neighboring countries. These employees are called third country nationals (TCNs). Since the resulting workforce is composed of individuals from three or more different countries and cultures, the organization experiences cultural diversity throughout its international business operations (Sako, 2006).
When a company enters an international market as part of its growth strategy, it must formulate a comprehensive cultural diversity management policy for its diverse workforce (Seymen, 2006). Some organizations run dedicated cultural diversity management programs aimed at managing diverse employees effectively and efficiently in order to achieve long-term goals without encountering diversity-related issues (Jackson, 2011).
Due to the complexities brought by cultural diversity in the workplace, cross-cultural management has become a critical issue in the contemporary business world (Klett, 2010). Organizations make every effort to manage their culturally diverse workforces so that business operations continue to run effectively and efficiently (Sako, 2006). When done well, cross-cultural management can help an organization strengthen its organizational culture and achieve a competitive advantage through its human resources (Oslond & Biid, 2000).
Geert Hofstede's Theory of Cultural Dimensions describes the impact of national or societal culture on the individuals living in that country or society. The theory primarily focuses on evaluating the effects of culture on individuals' values and behaviors with their coworkers, neighbors, and associates. Hofstede proposed five dimensions of culture for this purpose (Sako, 2006): Power Distance, Masculinity vs. Femininity, Individualism vs. Collectivism, Long-term vs. Short-term Orientation, and Uncertainty Avoidance. All five dimensions aim to evaluate national cultures by examining how individuals perceive different aspects of cultural values in their country (Hofstede, 1993).
The first dimension, Power Distance, assesses individuals' beliefs about whether power is equally or unequally distributed in their society or country. In high power distance cultures, individuals accept or even support inequalities, whereas in low power distance cultures, people collectively work toward a fair and transparent power system (Pathak, 2011). This dimension explains how individuals perceive and respond to power inequalities in their culture. The power distance in Thailand is quite high, which means its citizens are more exposed to discrimination and inequalities at workplaces, in societal relationships, and in decision-making processes (Hofstede, 1993).
The second dimension, Masculinity vs. Femininity, emphasizes the emotional aspects of cultural values. According to Hofstede's theory, masculine cultures are more inclined toward competition, materialism, and self-actualization. By contrast, feminine cultures give greater importance to relationships, care, and social harmony. Hofstede argues that masculine cultures drive individuals to achieve high aims in their lives (Kandola, 2008), while feminine cultures encourage respect for cultural diversity and the social norms and habits of society members (Hofstede, 1993).
According to this dimension, there are two types of individuals in every society. First, those who are more concerned with personal achievements and goals rather than the betterment of the whole community — these people are described as individualistic in nature. Second, there are collectivist individuals who give greater preference and importance to group effort and collective achievement (Jackson, 2011). When applied to the workplace, collectivism is arguably the more important of the two, as a collectivist society tends to focus on long-term and strategic goals (Dowling & Welch, 2008).
Employees in a collectivist culture work for the success and prosperity of the whole organization and subordinate their personal interests to those of the organization. To promote cultural diversity at the workplace, organizations should therefore foster a collectivist orientation (Hofstede, 1993).
Uncertainty avoidance refers to the resistance and anxiety that members of a society display toward unknown or unwanted events. In high uncertainty avoidance cultures, society members prefer routine tasks and tend to avoid new things. In low uncertainty avoidance cultures, there is greater room for improvement and innovation (Hofstede, 1993).
A long-term oriented culture emphasizes the future of the society or workplace, whereas short-term orientation focuses on current goals and objectives. For an organization to succeed in its industry, employees should maintain a focus on long-term objectives while also ensuring that short-term goals are achieved efficiently — laying the groundwork for long-term success (Pathak, 2011; Hofstede, 1993).
Nearly a decade after the publication of Hofstede's five cultural dimensions, McSweeney presented a detailed criticism of each dimension in 2002. McSweeney largely criticized the dimensions on the grounds of their applicability to all kinds of cultures and workplace environments (Kinasevych, 2010). He argued that Hofstede's cultural dimensions cannot be applied to analyze all types of cultures — either individually or collectively for an entire country — and that Hofstede had completely failed to effectively define and explain national culture in his assumptions, focusing too narrowly on individual cultures instead (McSweeney, 2002; Levy, Taylor, & Boyacigiller, 2010).
McSweeney proposed a more refined model against Hofstede's five dimensions, one that gives attention to both individual and national culture rather than presenting a generalized discussion applicable to all culture types (McSweeney, 2002). The cultural dimensions presented by McSweeney are now widely implemented in multinational organizations to manage their culturally dispersed employees (Kinasevych, 2010).
Kreiser, Marino, Dickson, and Weaver (2010) have also criticized Hofstede's five cultural dimensions, arguing that uncertainty avoidance and power distance restrict individuals from taking risks and pursuing high ambitions. They contend that collectivist cultures do not flourish in low power distance and high uncertainty avoidance environments (Lenz, 2008). Their findings suggest that individuals should be given a proper platform where they can take risks and contribute toward organizational innovation. Individuals cannot achieve their highest potential at the workplace if the majority of their coworkers avoid risk-taking and resist uncertainty (Gopalan & Stahl, 1998).
"Overview of Minor International's diversity approach"
Minor International recognizes the importance of cultural diversity and strategic human resource management for its success and superior operational performance. Accordingly, its business principles, vision, and corporate values reflect friendliness, care, and respect for minority employees who form an important part of its workforce (Minor International, 2013).
A culturally diverse workforce has a significant influence on organizational productivity and overall management practices. Recent research suggests that organizations should prioritize diversity management as a means of gaining a competitive advantage through their human resources. Since organizational culture is directly related to the behavior and actions of people at the workplace, operational performance and productivity are largely dependent on how well employees engage with organizational culture and values (Kandola, 2008). At Minor International, every new employee who joins the workforce becomes part of its organizational culture by learning the core values and beliefs shared by existing organizational members (Minor International, 2013).
One of the most significant impacts of organizational culture is on employee turnover. A strong organizational culture supports employee retention strategies: when employees respect cultural diversity, minority groups feel comfortable in the workplace, stay longer, and work more dedicatedly. Conversely, when cultural diversity is not respected, minority employees display absenteeism and low morale, resulting in higher employee turnover (Levy, Taylor, & Boyacigiller, 2010).
Organizational culture directly impacts the way employees from different departments interact with one another. Effective communication enables employees to share information and support each other in day-to-day tasks (Dowling & Welch, 2008). The management at Minor International ensures proper communication and coordination among its employees so that tasks are completed in the most effective and efficient manner. Improper communication can lead to conflicts and interpersonal issues (Lenz, 2008), so management places special emphasis on making both horizontal and vertical communication effective for every employee (Klett, 2010).
Organizational culture influences employee performance and morale. When employees respect cultural diversity, share information with coworkers, support one another in day-to-day tasks, and work together as a unified team, organizations see significant improvements in productivity. A strong organizational culture also motivates employees to work harder toward organizational goals — employees who feel motivated consider themselves an important part of the organization and feel committed to its success and prosperity.
A strong organizational culture also supports management's approach of engaging lower and middle-level workers in the decision-making process. Feeling like an important part of the organization, employees are more willing to contribute to decisions (Dowling & Welch, 2008). Management can invite valuable feedback on how to improve productivity and overall operational performance, and employee participation is also essential for promoting brainstorming and generating innovative ideas (Klett, 2010).
Research suggests that a strong organizational culture provides greater opportunities for continuous growth and development for organizational members. As an organization prospers through superior operational and financial performance over time, employees find more opportunities to advance within the organization. These opportunities also increase training and skills development costs, as management must invest more in developing employees to equip them with the advanced knowledge and skills required (Gopalan & Stahl, 1998).
To manage its culturally diverse workforce effectively, Minor International runs various diversity programs. The benefits Minor International realizes from these programs include better marketing efforts, more effective execution of strategies, and greater creativity and innovation from its employees.
Better Marketing Efforts: By running diversity programs, Minor International improves its marketing and promotional efforts. Employees are trained in different operational areas, learning best practices in customer service, data analysis, quality assurance, and other approaches that boost the company's operational and financial performance. These employees find new ways to market the company's products and services in a more effective and cost-efficient manner.
Better Execution of Strategies: Diversity programs also help Minor International's management execute its strategies more effectively. By assigning the right responsibilities to the right organizational members, management ensures that everyone plays their best role in the organization's success. It is also recognized at Minor International that a culturally diverse workforce can perform better than a homogeneous local workforce, as diverse employees share their varied industry experiences and recommend better solutions to organization-wide problems (Kandola, 2008; Robbins, Judge, & Sanghi, 2007).
"How individual backgrounds shape organizational culture"
"Conflicts, resistance to change, and leadership roles"
Cultural diversity has become a major issue for business organizations that set up operations in international markets as part of their growth strategies. The management of a culturally diverse workforce is one of the most important roles played by human resource managers in multinational organizations (Janssens & Steyaert, 2003). While cultural diversity can deliver numerous benefits to an organization, it also brings a range of challenges and issues for senior and middle-level management (Collings, 2012).
You’re 53% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.