This paper presents an annotated literature review of three empirical studies examining the determinants of customer loyalty. Drawing on research by Lai et al. (2009), Brakus et al. (2009), and Liao and Hsieh (2011), the paper explores how service quality, perceived value, brand experience, corporate image, and customer satisfaction contribute to loyalty formation across different industries and cultural contexts. Each annotation summarizes the study's findings, evaluates its methodological strengths and limitations, and draws implications for a broader understanding of loyalty as an abstract yet strategically important concept. The review concludes with a unifying thesis: loyalty can be achieved and retained when managers accurately predict and fulfill customer needs across all dimensions of the service and brand experience.
The following annotated bibliography examines three empirical studies on customer loyalty, exploring how service quality, brand experience, perceived value, and satisfaction function as loyalty drivers across different industries and cultural settings.
Lai, F., et al. (2009). How quality, value, image, and satisfaction create loyalty at a Chinese telecom. Impact of Culture on Marketing Strategy, 62, 980–986.
Lai et al. (2009) propose and test a model that examines possible associations between service quality, value, image, satisfaction, and loyalty in China. The investigation and analysis of survey data from 118 customers of a Chinese mobile communications company reveals that quality of service directly influences both the perceived value and the image perceptions of the company; that this perceived value and customer image of the company in turn influence customer satisfaction; that the image of the manager influences the perceived value of the company; and that both customer satisfaction and perceived value are fundamental factors of loyalty.
The research is reliable in that a significant number of customers were surveyed. Limitations, however, include the possibility that some respondents may have had a subjective relationship with the company — for example, as stakeholders or associates of management — or may have received incentives to respond positively. Moreover, the researchers surveyed only one company; other companies might have produced different results. Customers surveyed at different points in time may also have responded differently, as recent company conditions could have shaped their answers. Longitudinal and cross-sectional research designs would therefore be valuable for further investigation of this subject. Some outcomes may additionally be attributable to cultural factors, such as China's characteristic emphasis on inclusion, which may encourage expressions of loyalty among Chinese consumers. A different cultural context might reveal different determinants of loyalty.
This article is helpful to the broader research question because loyalty is an abstract concept. The study shows that consumer loyalty can be premised on company value and the characteristics of leadership. These characteristics may readily be extended to understand loyalty-building in other contexts.
Brakus, J. J., et al. (2009). Brand experience: What is it? How is it measured? Does it affect loyalty? Journal of Marketing, 73, 52–68.
Brand experience affects customer loyalty and is therefore an important concept. Brand experience is defined as the sensations, feelings, cognitions, and behavioral responses evoked by specific aspects of a brand's packaging, including its environment, communication, and overall stimuli. Because brand packaging can be nebulous, the authors distinguish between several types of experience and construct a brand experience scale spanning four dimensions: sensory, affective, intellectual, and behavioral. The authors tested this scale across six studies to demonstrate that it is reliable, valid, and distinct from other brand measures — including brand evaluations, brand involvement, brand attachment, customer delight, and brand personality.
The brand experience scale was thoroughly tested across different contexts and is short and easy to administer, consisting of only 12 items. Its value extends beyond academic research to marketing and business practice. Limitations include the fact that the scale does not measure whether an experience is positive or negative, nor can it predict specific behavioral outcomes. Further research should also focus on the antecedents and long-term consequences of brand experiences, and on how marketers can use brand-building strategies to foster loyalty.
This article is helpful to the research because, as suggested by Lai et al. (2009), customer loyalty is partly built on the customer's perception of a company's value — that is, its brand. Brakus et al. (2009) identify the key components of brand appeal. Incorporating these components may — though not necessarily — help managers construct brands capable of generating loyalty. The implications for understanding loyalty as a general concept are thus considerable.
Liao, K.-H., & Hsieh, M.-F. (2011). Satisfaction and customer loyalty in the leisure resort industry. The 2nd International Research Symposium in Service Management.
"Liao and Hsieh on tourism service quality"
"Unifying claim on achieving customer loyalty"
You’re 61% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.