Research Paper Graduate 2,719 words

Customer Satisfaction as a Nonfinancial Performance Measure

~14 min read 6 sections Business · Customer Satisfaction

Abstract

This paper examines customer satisfaction as a nonfinancial performance measure, with a particular focus on Chinese manufacturers. It reviews existing literature on financial versus nonfinancial performance metrics, arguing that manufacturers must move beyond ROA and ROE to capture the full picture of business health. The paper investigates how customer satisfaction is currently used—or underused—as a performance measure, why some firms resist adopting it, and what evidence exists linking it to improved financial outcomes. Drawing on relationship marketing theory, Total Quality Management, and the balanced scorecard literature, the paper identifies a significant research gap concerning qualitative studies of customer satisfaction in China's manufacturing sector and proposes a semi-structured interview methodology to begin filling that gap.

Key Takeaways

Introduction: Financial vs. Nonfinancial Performance Measures: Why manufacturers need nonfinancial metrics beyond revenue
Customer Satisfaction as a Strategic Performance Tool: Customer satisfaction defined as key performance measure
Evidence Linking Customer Satisfaction to Firm Performance: Literature on satisfaction, loyalty, and financial outcomes
Total Quality Management and Employee Training: TQM and employee behavior in service quality delivery
Relationship Marketing in Manufacturing: RM history and its absence in Chinese manufacturing
Research Gap and Qualitative Methodology: Study design, gap identification, and interview questions

✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾

What makes this paper effective

The paper clearly justifies its focus on a single nonfinancial measure — customer satisfaction — rather than attempting to survey all nonfinancial metrics, giving the argument a tight, manageable scope.
It situates the study within a specific national and sectoral context (Chinese manufacturers), which sharpens the research gap and makes the contribution concrete and original.
The literature review is cumulative: each theoretical framework (balanced scorecard, TQM, relationship marketing) is introduced to build toward the same conclusion — that customer satisfaction is systematically understudied in Chinese manufacturing.

Key academic technique demonstrated

The paper demonstrates effective gap identification in a literature review. Rather than simply summarizing prior studies, the author consistently notes where previous research does not extend — specifically the absence of qualitative, manufacturer-focused, China-based studies on customer satisfaction — and uses that absence to justify the proposed methodology. This technique gives a modest-scope study legitimate academic purpose.

Structure breakdown

The paper opens with a broad argument for nonfinancial measures, narrows to customer satisfaction, then reviews evidence for and against its adoption. It proceeds through TQM and relationship marketing as supporting frameworks before closing with the research design rationale and proposed interview questions. This funnel structure — broad context → theoretical support → methodology — is well-suited to a literature-review-based research proposal at the graduate level.

📘 Read the full research paper guide → Generate citations → Build an outline → Draft a literature review → 📚 More Customer Satisfaction examples →

Essay 2,719 words

Introduction: Financial vs. Nonfinancial Performance Measures

Challenges to manufacturers, as well as to many other business structures, are significant and often carry a great deal of weight in decision making and future business success. Performance measures are frequently focused solely on financial outcomes — return on assets (ROA), return on equity (ROE), revenue generated over time, units sold, and cost savings from improved processes. These financial performance measures are often the core of organizational review, and yet there is significant evidence that nonfinancial performance measures are also an important aspect of doing business, especially in increasingly competitive markets.

The manufacturing sector relies on large sales to a small number of customers. Given this reality, manufacturing organizations that wish to remain viable must develop a clearer understanding of the impact of nonfinancial performance measures as a means of retaining and even growing their customer base. This research focuses on one kind of nonfinancial performance measurement: customer satisfaction. Customer satisfaction was chosen because it is one of the most important strategic analysis tools for both manufacturers and service organizations (McLellan & Moustafa, 2008). Businesses cannot survive without customers in any context.

A logical assessment of nonfinancial performance measures would appear to be a realistic focus for strategy in the manufacturing sector, as globalization and many other factors combine to alter the manner and pace of industry growth. Seeking to administer management incentives, high-quality service delivery, and employee retention through traditional financial assessments alone is clearly insufficient. It is therefore understandable why current research is moving toward application assessments for nonfinancial performance measures used in conjunction with financial ones — in order to fully understand the "balanced" process and reality of goods delivery in the manufacturing sector. Without such innovation in delivery, application, and research, the industry risks losing the incentive structures needed to sustain high rates of change and rapid expansion. Evaluating new and innovative ways to demonstrate and improve success is therefore a responsibility of research scholars, and researchers have embraced this idea by seeking a better understanding of nonfinancial performance measures in the manufacturing sector.

5 Sections Hidden · 1,550 words

Customer Satisfaction as a Strategic Performance Tool380 words

One of the greatest challenges of researching and implementing customer satisfaction as a performance measure is its resistance to quantification. Nevertheless, challenging manufacturers and researchers to develop a greater understanding of…

Evidence Linking Customer Satisfaction to Firm Performance430 words

Though there are some conflicting findings regarding whether customer satisfaction improves performance, most research has identified a positive link between using customer satisfaction as a performance measure and better firm performance. Some marketing studies have demonstrated that higher customer satisfaction increases customer…

Total Quality Management and Employee Training200 words

In the non-manufacturing sector, frameworks such as Total Quality Management (TQM) also highlight the fact that employee training in the service industry is an essential component of customer service. One cannot assume that employees will exercise common sense when dealing…

Relationship Marketing in Manufacturing280 words

Another important topic in the review of literature on nonfinancial performance measures is relationship marketing, which took root in manufacturing more than 50 years ago but remains largely unstudied as a feature of Chinese manufacturing, in part due to a lack of relevant research. Relationship marketing has a relatively short history in the business and…

Research Gap and Qualitative Methodology260 words

Though the research aspect of this work utilizes a qualitative assessment of the manner in which customer satisfaction is seen as a factor in business dealings among Chinese manufacturers — almost as a baseline for further research — it will not look specifically at any one marketing strategy. Each of the strategies mentioned above uses customer satisfaction as a…

View Full Document

References

Abdel-Maksoud, A.B., Abdel-Kader, M., & Epstein, M.J. (2007). Non-Financial Performance Measurement and Management Practices in Manufacturing Firms. New York, NY: JAI Press Inc.

Anderson, E.W., Fornell, C., & Lehmann, D.R. (July 1994). Customer satisfaction, market share, and profitability: Findings from Sweden. Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 53–66.

Banker, R.D., Potter, G.S., & Srinivasan, D. (December 1997). An empirical investigation of an incentive plan based on nonfinancial performance measures. Retrieved from DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.67808

Chenhall, R.H., & Langfield-Smith, K.L. (2007). Multiple perspectives of performance measures. European Management Journal, 25(4), 266–282. doi:10.1016/j.emj.2007.06.001

Deng, Z., Lu, Y., Kee Wei, K., & Zhang, J. (August 2010). Understanding customer satisfaction and loyalty: An empirical study of mobile instant messages in China. International Journal of Information Management, 30(4), 289–300.

Ferreiraa, A., & Otley, D. (2009). The design and use of performance management systems: An extended framework for analysis. Management Accounting Research, 20, 263–282.

Fornell, C. (January 1992). A national customer satisfaction barometer: The Swedish experience. Journal of Marketing, 56(1), 6–21.

Franco-Santos, M., Lucianetti, L., & Bourne, M. (2012). Contemporary performance measurement systems: A review of their consequences and a framework for research. Management Accounting Research. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2012.04.001

Heskett, J.L., Jones, T.O., Loveman, G.W., Sasser, W.E., Jr., & Schlesinger, L. (1994). Putting the service-profit chain to work. Harvard Business Review, 72(2), 164–174.

Ittner, C.D., & Larcker, D.F. (1999). Are nonfinancial measures leading indicators of financial performance? An analysis of customer satisfaction. Journal of Accounting Research, 36, 1–35.

Jones, T.O., & Sasser, W.E., Jr. (November–December 1995). Why satisfied customers defect. Harvard Business Review, 88–99.

Kaplan, R.S., & Norton, D.P. (January–February 1992). The balanced scorecard — measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 71–79.

Kaplan, R.S., & Norton, D.P. (1996). The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

Kaplan, R.S., & Norton, D.P. (2001). The Strategy-Focused Organization. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

Lovelock, C., & Wirtz, J. (2004). Services Marketing (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson–Prentice Hall.

Lusk, E.J., Halperin, M., & Zhang, B. (2006). The balanced scorecard: Suggestions for rebalancing. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 4(2), 100–114.

Luthans, F., & Kessler, D. (1993). Meeting the new paradigm challenges through total quality management. Management Quarterly, 34(1), 2.

McLellan, J.D., & Moustafa, E. (2008). An exploratory analysis of the importance of management accounting tools in the GCC countries. Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences, 24(2), 54–77.

Reichheld, F.F. (March–April 1993). Loyalty-based management. Harvard Business Review, 64–73.

Reichheld, F.F. (July–August 2001). Lead for loyalty. Harvard Business Review, 76–85.

Said, A.A., Hassab Elnaby, H.R., & Wier, B. (January 2003). An empirical investigation of the performance consequences of nonfinancial measures. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 15, 193–224.

Seroka, P.H. (February 2000). Keeping the customer for life. Mortgage Banking, 60(5), 42–49.

Smith, R.E., & Wright, W.F. (2004). Determinants of customer loyalty and financial performance. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 16, 183–205.

Veloutsou, C., Saren, M., & Tzokas, N. (2002). Relationship marketing: What if…? European Journal of Marketing, 36(4), 433–449.

Wober, K.W. (2002). Benchmarking in Tourism and Hospitality Industries. New York, NY: CABI Publishing.

Key Concepts in This Paper

Customer Satisfaction Nonfinancial Measures Chinese Manufacturers Balanced Scorecard Firm Performance Customer Retention Relationship Marketing Total Quality Management Performance Incentives Qualitative Research