Cyprus Problem: Greek-Turkish Conflict, EU Membership, and Peace
This paper examines the Cyprus problem — a protracted intercommunal conflict between Greek Cypriots and Turkish Cypriots that has divided the island since 1963 and geographically since Turkey's 1974 invasion. Drawing on extensive historical background, UN resolution records, and contemporary scholarship, the paper traces the conflict from the establishment of the Republic of Cyprus through the failed UN Annan Plan referendum of 2004 and Cyprus's accession to the European Union. It analyzes the competing interests of Great Britain, Greece, Turkey, and both Cypriot communities, evaluates sovereignty claims, and assesses the EU's role as a potential catalyst for resolution. The paper argues that a just — not merely expedient — settlement is the only outcome the Greek Cypriot majority will accept, and concludes with policy implications and recommendations for achieving genuine reunification.
- Introduction and Nature of the Problem: Defines the conflict and research question
- Historical Background: Cyprus history from ancient times to 2011
- Literature Review: Stakeholder Perspectives: Britain, Greece, Turkey, and Cypriot community views
- EU Membership and the Cyprus Problem: EU accession and its leverage on Turkey
- Struggle for Justice and Compromise: UN resolutions and failure of compromise plans
- Where Should the Solution Line Be Drawn?: Arguments against a permanent dividing line
- Policy Implications and Conclusions: Recommended policy changes and final conclusions
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Provides a thorough chronological history that contextualizes each escalation — from the 1963 intercommunal incident to the 1974 dual invasion — before moving to analysis, giving readers a clear causal framework.
- Balances multiple stakeholder perspectives (Great Britain, Greece, Turkey, Greek Cypriots, Turkish Cypriots) in a dedicated literature review section rather than presenting only one side of the dispute.
- Grounds normative arguments in specific legal precedents, including the Loizidou v. Turkey ruling and the Apostolides–Orams case, lending the policy recommendations concrete evidentiary weight.
- Uses Dr. Van Coufoudakis's conclusions and direct quotations from UN Security Council records to support claims, demonstrating engagement with both primary and secondary sources.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates historical contextualization as argumentative scaffolding: rather than asserting that Turkey's occupation is unjust, the author reconstructs the sequence of events — the 1974 coup, the first and second Turkish invasions, the Geneva accords, the TRNC declaration — so that the normative conclusion emerges organically from the documented record. This technique strengthens persuasive writing by allowing evidence to carry the burden of argument.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a summary and introduction that define the research question. A lengthy historical background section covers ancient settlement through the 2011 demonstrations. A literature review examines each party's position. The analysis section addresses EU membership, the justice-versus-compromise tension, the question of where a solution line should be drawn, and policy implications. A conclusion synthesizes findings and calls for constitutional reform, Turkish withdrawal, and stronger international pressure. References follow APA formatting throughout.
Introduction and Nature of the Problem
The Cyprus problem already spans three generations of Cypriots and, as it encroaches on the fourth, it appears as intractable as ever. Divided administratively in 1963 and geographically since 1974, the conflict has defied attempts at resolution through bicommunal means with the help of the United Nations and the international community. What makes it so difficult to solve?
Outsiders may find the question perplexing, but for the Cypriots themselves the issue is relatively straightforward. The Greek Cypriots would like to see their sovereign and civil rights — violated by the 1974 Turkish invasion and the continuing occupation of the northern part of the island — restored and safeguarded. The Turkish Cypriot leadership, under Turkey's direct control, wants to retain the territorial and political advantages gained as a result of that invasion.
To demonstrate this in historical perspective: the object of negotiations in the period 1964–1974 was a solution based on the self-government of the Turkish Cypriot community within a unitary state. Notwithstanding a series of UN General Assembly and Security Council resolutions calling for the withdrawal of foreign troops and the return of refugees in the wake of the Turkish invasion, the search for a solution after 1974 began to shift toward a federal system of government in which each community would live in its own geographical area. This approach was formalized through high-level agreements between the leaders of the two communities in 1977 and 1979.
The prospect for a just and viable compromise began to take shape when the Republic of Cyprus submitted its application to join the European Communities in 1990. This development was rightly described as a "catalyst" for the solution of the Cyprus problem: the security of the European framework addressed the concerns of both communities. The Turkish Cypriot minority would have its safety considerations satisfied, while the Greek Cypriot majority could rely on the fundamental democratic principles on which the European Union is founded to safeguard human rights and fundamental freedoms for all legitimate inhabitants.
This effort was thwarted because the Turkish Cypriot community, in order to further its own geopolitical interests, did not allow the catalyst effect to come into play. On the contrary, its sole recognition of the illegal regime in the occupied part of the island further tilted the solution effort toward a compromise far removed from justice. This resulted in the UN Annan Plan for Cyprus being rejected by an overwhelming majority of the Greek Cypriot community in 2004.
The recent massive demonstrations in the occupied north show that Turkish Cypriots no longer want the continuing presence of the Turkish army and its settlers. The current generation of Cypriot citizens seems willing to reach a compromise based on universally accepted rules and principles of international law — which is precisely why the continuing impasse in Cyprus defies easy explanation.
Rationale
The problem in Cyprus has now lasted close to half a century, and there seems to be no real solution in sight. Cyprus occupies a strategic location between the Middle East and Europe owing to its proximity to the Suez Canal and its relationship to Greece and Turkey. Large deposits of oil have also recently been discovered off the Cypriot shore, making the resolution of longstanding divisions even more complicated.
The UN Security Council has adopted multiple resolutions aimed at reaching an amicable settlement, but resistance continues from both sides. Although the island historically contains more ethnic Greek than Turkish residents, that does not mean concessions would be one-sided. Furthermore, Greece and Turkey each regard the island as a personal sphere of influence to be individually manipulated for their own purposes, while the people who inhabit Cyprus increasingly want complete freedom to develop as an independent nation. The UN has repeatedly attempted to resolve all outstanding issues, largely without success, and new developments in energy exploration threaten to generate further complications.
A concerted examination of the issues facing the Republic of Cyprus is needed, with realistic solutions drawn from that examination. The reasoning behind the present study is an effort to look at the island in both historical and contemporary contexts to identify what realistic solutions present themselves. Determining real solutions may avert a crisis caused by the volatile nature of the invested parties on both sides of the Cyprus problem.
Purpose and Research Question
Since high-level international negotiations have worked to resolve the increasingly difficult issues facing the Cypriot people — both Greek and Turkish — it would be illogical and presumptuous to assume that one research paper could find a solution overlooked by the international community. The general purpose here is to add a new voice to the discussion by conducting a thorough search of the existing literature and critically examining its content, in order to determine the true nature of the conflict and present solutions that may not have been previously examined to their full extent.
Research Question: As Cyprus struggles for justice rather than debilitating compromise, where should the solution line between Greek Cypriots and Turkish Cypriots be drawn, and what role does EU membership play in that process?
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.