Data Brokers: Secret Collection and Sale of Personal Data
This paper examines the largely hidden practice of data brokerage — the large-scale collection, storage, and sale of personal consumer information without meaningful individual consent. It outlines the scale of the industry, estimated at over $300 billion annually, and explains how brokers gather data from public and private sources to sell to businesses, advertisers, and other third parties. The paper discusses both the commercial benefits of big data and the significant privacy risks it poses, including inaccurate consumer scoring, lack of transparency, and the absence of corrective mechanisms for affected individuals. It concludes by calling for clearer regulatory frameworks that define acceptable data use and restore consumer control over personal information.
- Introduction: The Data Brokerage Industry: Scale, legality, and scope of data brokerage
- Privacy Risks and the Problem of Consumer Scores: Secrecy, inaccuracy, and consumer helplessness
- How Data Brokers Collect and Use Personal Information: Sources and common uses of brokered data
- Business Benefits of Consumer Data: Personalization, marketing, and commercial value
- Regulation and the Future of Data Privacy: Evolving privacy laws and industry adaptation
- Conclusion: Call for consumer control and clearer data rules
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Presents a balanced treatment of data brokerage by acknowledging both its commercial utility and its serious privacy risks, avoiding one-sided advocacy.
- Uses concrete industry details — the $300 billion annual valuation, three million US employees, and specific data categories such as medical conditions and sexual orientation — to ground abstract privacy concerns in measurable reality.
- Organizes the argument progressively, moving from industry overview to specific harms to regulatory outlook, giving the reader a logical through-line.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates effective use of the concession-and-rebuttal structure. It acknowledges that data brokers offer legitimate services such as fraud prevention and targeted marketing before pivoting to identify three distinct harms — secrecy of consumer scores, data inaccuracy, and the consumer's inability to correct or access their own records. This technique strengthens the argument by showing awareness of counterpoints rather than dismissing them.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with an industry overview establishing scale and legality, then narrows to specific privacy threats (particularly consumer scoring), broadens again to cover legitimate data uses, addresses regulatory trends, and closes with a normative call for consumer-centered policy reform. The structure follows a zoom-in/zoom-out pattern common in issue-analysis essays at the undergraduate level.
Introduction: The Data Brokerage Industry
The large-scale collection, sale, and free access to sensitive personal information — accompanied by inadequate regulatory controls — leaves much room for misuse. Those who desire to limit access to their personal details find themselves with few options, since in most cases the parties that collect data are able to categorize, store, and sell that information without the consent of the individuals concerned. Even when information is voluntarily given to social networking or e-commerce websites, users cannot control who that information will subsequently be sold to (Tsesis, 2014).
The data brokerage industry is currently a $300-billion-per-year industry, with around three million employees in the United States alone. Information brokers attempt to understand customer identity and interests in order to deliver more relevant advertisements. Data-brokering companies provide information on services and products of potential interest to buyers, and all data collected and used by them is characterized as legal, secure, and accurate. Clients range from small businesses to Fortune 500 corporations (Morris & Lavandera, 2012).
Information is immensely valuable to both individuals and companies. Critics of data-brokering organizations claim that average consumers are unaware their sensitive information is being sold, and assert that this constitutes a serious privacy risk. On the other hand, major decisions about real buyers are increasingly made on the basis of virtual, data-derived profiles (Morris & Lavandera, 2012). Like most innovations, big data is a double-edged sword: it enables large-scale personalization of services and products, facilitates business risk mitigation, and drives novel business models — but it also carries significant potential for harm (Buytendijk & Heiser, 2013). This paper addresses the unanticipated harms to organizations and individuals that may arise if data scientists are permitted to operate without adequate oversight.
The client base of information brokers is ever-growing, with clients keen on learning about people's spending habits, sexual orientation, ethnic origin, and specific illnesses such as HIV/AIDS, depression, drug abuse, and diabetes. Such data can be accessed directly from data brokers' records or predicted from other data points. Finding out what personal data is being disseminated about oneself — and correcting it — is virtually impossible. To complicate matters further, data brokerage is a completely legal industry, and brokers are known to be particularly secretive (Boutin, 2016).
References
Boutin, P. (2016, June 16). There's very little oversight in the industry of data brokers. Newsweek.
Buytendijk, F., & Heiser, J. (2013). Confronting the privacy and ethical risks of Big Data. Financial Times.
Morris, J., & Lavandera, E. (2012, August 23). Why big companies buy, sell your data. CNN.
Tsesis, A. (2014). The right to erasure: Privacy, data brokers, and the indefinite retention of data. Wake Forest L. Rev., 49, 433.
Uzialko, A. C. (2018, August 3). How businesses are collecting data (and what they're doing with it). Business News Daily.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.