This paper examines attitudes toward death and grieving in the United States and across cultures. It begins with leading causes of death in the U.S. and how chronic illness complicates the grieving process. It then evaluates Kübler-Ross's Five Stages of Grief, questioning whether the model is culturally universal or reflects distinctly American values of autonomy and individualism. Drawing on cross-cultural research, the paper compares grief expression among Anglo, Latino, African-American, and Japanese communities, highlighting how religious belief, family structure, and cultural norms shape responses to loss. It concludes by discussing how healthcare providers should navigate cultural differences in end-of-life decision-making.
According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the top three causes of death in the United States are heart disease (631,636 per year), cancer (559,888), and cerebrovascular diseases or strokes (137,119). While not all of these cases are preventable, it is clear that many people do not take basic precautions to minimize their risks — such as maintaining a healthy weight, refraining from smoking, and exercising regularly.
Many of these illnesses are also chronic and long-standing in duration. The difficulty of caring for someone who is chronically ill can make the grieving process even more complex. The anger and resentment that may accompany caring for someone who requires constant attention — especially if the illness was preventable — and the guilt of entrusting that care to others, such as in a hospital, nursing home, or hospice, can tear a family apart even before a loved one passes. Of course, witnessing a loved one's sudden death and the inability to say goodbye carries its own distinct emotional burdens.
Different models have been proposed to help understand and navigate grief. One of the most widely known is Elisabeth Kübler-Ross's Five Stages of Grief, which proposes that grieving unfolds through sequential stages of denial, anger, bargaining, depression, and final acceptance. However, this progression is not necessarily culturally universal. The feelings of denial ("this can't be happening to me") and anger could be interpreted as products of American culture and its difficulty in openly and honestly confronting death. Kübler-Ross herself wrote: "the way that a society or subculture explains death will have a significant impact on the way its members view and experience life" (Kübler-Ross, 1975, p. 27). Conversely, America's prioritization of choice, autonomy, and individualism has shaped its view of death, despite the fact that death is an inevitable process over which there is often little control.
"Grief differences across Latino, Asian, and Anglo cultures"
"Cultural norms shaping healthcare decisions at end of life"
You’re 37% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.