Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill: A Virtue Ethics Case Study
This paper presents a case study analysis of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill — the worst oil spill in U.S. history — through the framework of virtue ethics. It identifies the main actors, including BP, Transocean, and Halliburton, and examines the key ethical failures that led to and followed the disaster. The paper evaluates available options for BP and argues that accepting full responsibility, making restitution to affected stakeholders, and committing to transparent safety oversight represents the most ethical course of action. Drawing on virtue ethics, the paper defends this position by demonstrating how accountability and genuine remediation would restore BP's moral character and long-term standing.
- Introduction: Overview of the Deepwater Horizon spill and paper scope
- Main Characters and Their Roles: BP, Transocean, Halliburton, and other key actors
- Key Ethical Issues: Risk downplaying, negligence, and stakeholder duty failures
- Main Options Available to BP: Two paths: deflect blame or accept full responsibility
- The Most Ethical Option and Virtue Ethics Framework: Accepting responsibility and virtue ethics rationale
- Plan for Implementation: Restitution fund and transparent safety oversight steps
- Defense and Conclusion: Long-term character restoration through accountability
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper applies a single ethical framework — virtue ethics — consistently throughout, grounding every evaluative claim in that framework rather than switching between theories.
- It clearly distinguishes between multiple responsible parties while maintaining a focused argument that BP bears ultimate accountability, avoiding oversimplification without losing analytical clarity.
- The move from ethical analysis to a concrete implementation plan strengthens the paper's practical relevance, bridging abstract moral reasoning with actionable recommendations.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates applied ethical analysis: it takes a real-world corporate crisis, identifies the morally relevant actors and actions, evaluates options against a stated normative framework (virtue ethics), and defends a recommended course of action. This structure — identify, evaluate, recommend, defend — is a standard and effective approach in professional and applied ethics writing.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with an introduction that previews its structure, then moves sequentially through identification of actors, analysis of ethical failures, enumeration of options, selection and defense of the most ethical option, and a practical implementation plan. The conclusion synthesizes the argument and reinforces the virtue ethics rationale. This tight, stepwise organization makes the reasoning easy to follow and evaluate.
Introduction
The Deepwater Horizon oil spill was the worst in U.S. history, and yet it could have been prevented had the agents involved taken proper care and precaution, even at some cost to themselves. This paper identifies the main characters and the ethical issues at stake. It then determines the main options available to the agents, discusses the most ethical option, and provides a plan for implementation. Finally, it defends that decision and the moral principles it invokes by applying the virtue ethics framework.
Main Characters and Their Roles
The main characters in the Deepwater Horizon oil spill were BP; Transocean, the oil rig operator contracted by BP to operate Deepwater Horizon; Halliburton, which mixed the cement meant to seal the drill; the workers tasked with cleanup; the EPA, which oversees rules for cleanup; and analysts, whose task it was to observe and identify problems. The main actor was BP, as it downplayed the risk posed by "kicks" — events in which natural gas is suddenly unleashed during drilling. The rig operators also demonstrated a lack of care and diligence in operating the rig, and Halliburton failed to mix the cement for the seal properly, contributing to the explosion. During the cleanup process, BP injected hundreds of thousands of gallons of Corexit into the oil to help break it up, a substance that also contributed to the illness of hundreds of crew workers (Claasen & McNamara, n.d.).
References
Claasen, C. & McNamara, T. (n.d.). The Deepwater Horizon oil spill.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.