Defining Success: Subjectivity, Motivation, and Personal Goals
This paper examines the multifaceted and subjective nature of success, drawing on the Merriam-Webster definition to explore how individuals construct their own criteria for achievement. The author argues that success is dynamic and context-dependent, varying across time, profession, and personal circumstance. The paper then transitions into a personal reflection, discussing the author's own goal-setting practices and the inspiring example of a self-made entrepreneur — the author's father — who grew a business from roughly $1,000 into a billion-dollar enterprise. Together, these threads suggest that concrete goal-setting and consistent effort are more productive than chasing abstract notions of success.
- Introduction: Many Paths to Success: Success varies by person, context, and objective
- What Does Success Mean? Defining a Subjective Concept: Dictionary definition unpacked through multiple real-world examples
- The Dynamic and Contextual Nature of Success: Success is time-bound, contextual, and applied in degrees
- Personal Reflection: Goal-Setting and My Own Approach: Author's concrete goal-setting habits and weekly review practice
- A Living Example: My Father's Journey: Self-made entrepreneur father as model of consistent effort
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Grounds an abstract concept (success) in a concrete dictionary definition before layering in nuance, giving the reader a clear starting point.
- Uses relatable, varied examples — a university chancellor, a marketing professional, Bill Gates — to illustrate how success is context-dependent without overstating the argument.
- Balances analytical discussion with genuine personal reflection, making the conclusion feel earned rather than generic.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates concept unpacking: the author takes a single familiar word, isolates its dictionary definition, and then systematically extends it across multiple dimensions (internal vs. external perception, temporal context, simultaneous goals). This technique shows examiners that the writer can move from definition to analysis rather than treating a concept as self-evident.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a broad framing paragraph establishing that success is subjective. It then moves into an analytical section that unpacks the definition and examines how success varies by person, time, and context. A personal reflection section follows, covering the author's own goal-setting habits and a profile of a successful family member. The conclusion is embedded in the final paragraph, drawing a practical lesson about prioritizing goals over abstractions.
Introduction: Many Paths to Success
There can be different paths to success as well as different perceptions of what being successful actually means. Success can mean different things to different people depending on what their objectives are. For example, success to a scientist might consist of creating the next breakthrough research study or finding a medical discovery that saves lives. Success to a business professional might represent many different achievements depending on personal or professional goals. A leader of a Fortune 500 company, for instance, might define success very differently from the owner of a small local shop. This paper outlines some of the subjective constructs commonly associated with success and how they relate to motivation, as well as a personal reflection on the career of one of the most successful people I know — my father.
What Does Success Mean? Defining a Subjective Concept
Success is a complex concept that carries a great deal of subjectivity. The Merriam-Webster definition of success offers three related meanings:
The fact of getting or achieving wealth, respect, or fame; the correct or desired result of an attempt; someone or something that is successful — a person or thing that succeeds.
From this definition, the meaning of being successful can rest on either internally constructed metrics about one's own level of achievement, or those same metrics can be applied to virtually anyone else. It is equally possible to borrow metrics designed by others and apply them to yourself or to someone you know. For example, it is easy to perceive that Bill Gates seems like an extremely successful entrepreneur, regardless of whether Gates himself considers his own career a success. It is also easy to imagine situations in which such perceptions conflict. A university chancellor might be seen by colleagues as having had an exemplary career, while the chancellor privately considers himself a failure because he never became a CEO, a politician, an author, or any number of other things he once aspired to be.
The Dynamic and Contextual Nature of Success
Just as the criteria used to define success can vary from person to person, the concept is also dynamic in that it can be applied in varying degrees to either narrow or broad goals. Success can be understood within a specific context — a particular time period or situation. An individual might be considered successful in college, then go through two decades without notable achievement, and then accomplish something that restores that sense of success. The perception of achievement can also apply to several objectives pursued simultaneously. A marketing professional might succeed in identifying a target market, fall short in crafting an engaging message, and yet still meet the organization's monthly sales quota — all at the same time.
Given the endless variety of ways success can be framed, it is clear that success is entirely subjective, and each person is entitled to their own working definition of it. Scholars who study motivation and goal-setting similarly emphasize that individual benchmarks, rather than universal standards, tend to drive the most sustained effort.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.