This paper examines drunk driving (DUI) as a persistent public safety crisis in the United States, drawing on statistical data and academic research to explore its scope, demographic patterns, and potential solutions. It highlights alarming fatality and injury figures, the disproportionate impact on young drivers, and the gap between evidence-based prevention strategies and the public preference for punitive sentencing. The paper also reviews progress made through cultural and legal changes since the 1980s while noting the emerging threat of driving under the influence of substances other than alcohol, including prescription drugs. Overall, it argues that continued research, education, and investment in alternatives remain essential to reducing DUI harm.
This study guide is drawn from PaperDue's library of 130,000+ paper examples across 47 subjects.
Drunk driving — and driving under the influence (DUI) in general — is a major problem in the United States. The problem is a common cause of traffic accidents and traffic fatalities and represents a pervasive legal and social issue that has yet to be adequately solved. It may even be increasing in occurrence as the population spreads across larger and larger geographic areas (Flahardy 4). According to Flahardy, statistics show that first-time arrestees on DUI charges have driven while intoxicated an average of 80 times before being detained and arrested on their first DUI charge. As the distance between destinations grows ever wider, incidents of impaired driving appear to be increasing, as the practical barriers to alternatives — distance, cost, convenience, and time — become more prohibitive in the mind of the driver (Flahardy 4).
DUI disproportionately affects younger people and is associated with age, inexperience, and the heightened psychological tendency toward risk-taking among youth. "For young people aged 4–34, motor vehicle accidents are the number one killer (Subramanian, 2006, NHTSA, NCSA). Data from the Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS) from the NHTSA's National Center for Statistics and Analysis (NCSA) for 2004 show that more than a third of the operators between 20 and 29 involved in fatal accidents had alcohol in their systems" (Kramer A71). The broader statistics are equally alarming: "Every year drunk driving causes more than 17,000 fatalities and 500,000 injuries. Alcohol-related fatalities in the past 25 years, according to the website AlcoholAlert.com, total well over half a million" ("Wheels of Misfortune…" 4).
Though DUI and the deaths and disruptions it causes are not solely a young person's problem — people of all ages are affected — the patterns associated with DUI are often established early. The number of times a person will drive while intoxicated tends to increase over time, and the habits of risk-taking in situations where alternatives should be used can be formed at a young age.
Many consider DUI to be one of the most important problems in need of a solution in the United States, as the actions of even a single impaired driver can result in death and serious injury, creating unpredictable risk for nearly everyone on the road. Developing effective legislation is challenging, particularly given a noticeable disconnect between evidence-based practices that are known to work and a legalistic, individual-responsibility perspective on the issue. The national trend has been toward imposing stricter sentencing for DUI ("Wheels of Misfortune…" 4), yet evidence suggests that the most effective approaches are those centered on deterrence through education and awareness, as well as viable alternatives to driving while impaired — such as improved public transportation, clearer instruction on what it means to be a designated driver, and greater awareness of moderation and how it is practiced (Kramer A71).
According to Kramer, even though it is clear that these prevention interventions decrease the number of DUI events — with and without arrests — the public tends to view them as encouraging poor behavior rather than deterring it through tougher laws and sentencing, even though the deterrence argument is not necessarily supported by evidence (4).
Glascoff, Wallen, and Shrader stress that even though college students report using a designated driver approximately fifty percent of the time when they must travel after consuming drugs or alcohol, that designated driver has also frequently consumed drugs or alcohol (14). This failure to understand and comply with reduced-risk behaviors is pervasive among young people who use intoxicants and serves as a foundation for a long-standing pattern of risk-taking that does not often diminish until people are much older. The problem may even worsen as individuals leave educational settings — and therefore the larger peer support networks those environments provide. This behavior may then actually accelerate as individuals begin to perceive themselves as more responsible, even while still engaging in the same or similar risky conduct.
"College student risk behavior and designated driver misuse"
"Measurable declines in DUI deaths since 1980s"
"Rising impaired driving involving drugs beyond alcohol"
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.