This paper reviews C.S. Powell's 2000 Discover Magazine article "20 Ways the World Could End," framing it within the broader field of earth science. The paper examines the article's central argument that humanity faces extinction from natural disasters, human-triggered cataclysms, willful self-destruction, and greater cosmic forces. It also considers how scientific understanding of these threats has evolved since publication, how educators can apply the article in the classroom, and how computers have transformed modern scientific inquiry. The paper concludes by reflecting on both the practical and philosophical value of predicting humanity's potential end.
Earth science, the study of the Earth, is concerned with changes to the surface and interior of the Earth and the forces that cause those changes (Reed, 2008). Furthermore, earth science examines the interaction between Earth's weather and climate, as well as the changes of organisms through time as interpreted by the theory of organic evolution. This paper outlines factors that could make humanity extinct: natural disasters, human-triggered cataclysms, willful self-destruction, and greater forces directed against us. Understanding the future is important because it helps individuals take precautionary measures before any damage is realized.
The article's main objective is to ascertain whether human beings face imminent danger of extinction. It fulfills this objective by outlining factors that could bring an end to humanity. The article analyzes natural disasters, human-triggered cataclysms, willful self-destruction, and greater forces directed against humans — all of which could contribute to these outcomes.
Powell states: "At present, we may worry about snail darters and red squirrels in abstract terms. But the next statistic on the list could be us." These words may seem unreal to most people, but after analyzing the reasons presented in the article, they emerge as concrete concerns. The writer concludes that snail darters and red squirrels have become extinct due to both natural and human activities, and that humans are headed in the same direction. The article proposes twenty reasons why this could happen, beginning with natural forces such as asteroid explosions, collapse of the vacuum, and gamma ray bursts, among other factors (Powell, 2000).
Following the publication of this article, the scientific community's knowledge and understanding of the topic has changed considerably over time. Martin Rees, in his book Our Final Century, argues that the survival of human civilization beyond 2100 is less than 50% likely, due to easy access to technologies that could have global impacts, such as biological terrorism and molecular nanotechnology (Jha, 2011). In addition, scientists are becoming increasingly aware that cosmic threats to human existence have always been present yet largely unnoticed; the potential collision of the Milky Way with Andromeda and the onset of a black hole are among the scenarios under consideration (Oldroyd, 2006). Scientists are also aware that they have no definitive solution to these imminent threats — the best they can do is seek measures to reduce their impacts, a task that itself presents enormous challenges.
"Teachers using article and computer systems as examples"
"Value of predicting and preparing for humanity's end"
"Role of computers in modern scientific research"
Understanding the factors that could bring about the end of humanity — whether natural, cosmic, or human-triggered — remains one of the most pressing areas of earth science inquiry. By analyzing these threats, scientists, educators, and the broader public can work toward greater awareness and, where possible, meaningful preparation.
You’re 42% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.