This paper examines three key economic issues generated by rising health care costs in the United States: competitive disadvantages for businesses, increased tax burdens, and growing personal expenses for individuals. Drawing on data from the OECD, the Kaiser Foundation, and the Congressional Budget Office, the paper demonstrates that the United States spends significantly more on health care than other developed nations. Using both macroeconomic and microeconomic frameworks, it analyzes how employers are forced to pass rising costs onto employees, how double taxation through benefits and Medicare/Medicaid compounds the burden on businesses, and how these pressures ultimately leave millions of Americans without health insurance coverage.
Over the last several years, health care costs in the United States have been rising dramatically β increasing faster than in most developed and developing nations. Evidence of this can be seen in data compiled by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), which found that the United States spends two and a half times more than the average OECD country on health care services (Johnson, 2010). This is significant because it highlights how rising costs are slowly eating away at the economic well-being of both businesses and individuals.
Fully understanding the overall costs of health care reform requires identifying three economic issues affected by increasing prices: competitive disadvantages, increased taxes, and growing personal expenses. Each issue will be examined in turn, with attention to the economic theory most relevant to each. Together, these elements provide insight into how health care costs are affecting businesses and individuals across the country.
One of the primary ways that health care costs contribute to competitive disadvantages is by requiring businesses to spend more to cover their employees. This is a serious concern, given that 71% of private-sector employees relied on their employers for health care coverage (Johnson, 2010). When costs rise, this places increasing pressure on employers, many of whom begin passing health care expenses on to their workers.
Evidence of this trend can be found in research conducted by the Kaiser Family Foundation, which found that employer-sponsored health plans have been consistently declining while costs have risen by over 114% over the span of ten years (Johnson, 2010). This demonstrates how rising costs are compelling employers to shift a growing share of health care obligations onto employees.
From an economic theory perspective, both macroeconomic and microeconomic forces are at work. Overall trends in the industry and broader economy β macroeconomic factors β are driving prices upward. In response, individual employers adjust their behavior at the firm level β a microeconomic response β by passing those costs on to employees as they struggle to manage the financial challenge. In this way, microeconomics is being applied to a macroeconomic problem, with each business forced to adapt to conditions largely beyond its control ("Economic Theories," 2010).
"Double taxation through benefits and Medicare obligations"
"Costs passed to employees leaving millions uninsured"
Rising health care costs have been having a dramatic impact on both individuals and businesses, who are struggling to overcome the macroeconomic challenges of increasing prices. Through the interplay of competitive disadvantages, increased tax burdens, and growing personal expenses, it is clear that the economic consequences of health care costs in the United States are far-reaching. Both macroeconomic and microeconomic forces are at work, and addressing these issues will require policy solutions that account for the pressures faced at every level β from the national economy down to the individual household.
You’re 60% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.