EHR Implementation: HIT Systems Life Cycle Guide
This paper examines the Health Information Technology (HIT) systems life cycle as it applies to Electronic Health Records (EHR). It outlines the six principal phases of the information systems life cycle — initiation, analysis, design, implementation, operations/maturity, and evaluation — and explains how each phase contributes to selecting, deploying, and maintaining EHR systems. The paper also discusses EHR readiness assessment across four domains: organizational culture, management and leadership, operational readiness, and technical readiness. Additional coverage includes the composition and responsibilities of an EHR implementation steering committee, key product-selection criteria, and the three primary staff training approaches used during EHR implementation.
- Introduction to EHR and the HIT Systems Life Cycle: Defines EHR and introduces the HIT life cycle
- The Six Phases of the Information Systems Life Cycle: Details each of the six lifecycle phases
- EHR Readiness Assessment: Four-domain framework for assessing EHR readiness
- The EHR Implementation Steering Committee: Team roles essential to successful EHR rollout
- Product Selection Criteria and Training Methods: Vendor selection factors and three training approaches
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper progresses logically through each phase of the systems life cycle before moving to practical implementation concerns, giving readers a coherent framework before addressing specific details.
- Numbered phases and bulleted team-member lists improve scannability and make complex procedural content easy to follow.
- The paper consistently connects abstract lifecycle concepts to concrete EHR tasks, such as linking the evaluation phase directly to a four-domain readiness assessment.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates applied synthesis: it draws on peer-reviewed sources (Ajami et al., 2011; Joukes et al., 2016; Wright, 2014) to anchor each phase or recommendation in established research, then explains how each cited concept functions in an operational EHR setting. This technique grounds practitioner-oriented content in academic evidence without losing practical focus.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a definition of EHR and its purpose, then walks through the six-phase HIT systems life cycle. It narrows progressively — from life cycle overview, to readiness assessment domains, to team composition, and finally to vendor selection and staff training methods. Each section builds on the previous, following the natural sequence of an EHR adoption project from planning to go-live.
Introduction to EHR and the HIT Systems Life Cycle
The Health Information Technology (HIT) systems life cycle encompasses several broad categories, one of the most significant being Electronic Health Records (EHRs). EHRs are patient-centered, real-time records that allow users to retrieve information instantly, wherever and whenever it is needed. Simply put, EHRs are computerized, digital versions of a patient's paper charts. They contain medications, radiology images, test and lab results, immunization dates, and the patient's medical history. EHRs also provide access to evidence-based tools that providers can use when making decisions about a patient's care. In addition to streamlining and automating a provider's workflow, EHRs increase the accuracy and organization of patient information.
The Six Phases of the Information Systems Life Cycle
Security and maintenance represent the end phase of any basic system development life cycle. The entire process is used to recognize, examine, and design information systems (Vallette & Caldwell, 2013). To accomplish this aim, the process involves choosing and maintaining the best system, typically through six principal phases:
- Initiation phase
- Analysis phase
- Design phase
- Implementation phase
- Maturity/Operations phase
- Evaluation phase
Together, these six phases make up the information systems life cycle.
The initiation phase involves setting goals that include establishing a schedule, a budget, a statement of the problem, and the identification of system integration requirements. This is an integral step in understanding what is involved in replacing existing information systems and selecting new ones.
The analysis phase is the stage at which the health information manager identifies how an automated system will meet user requirements and support the performance of user tasks. Understanding the environment in which user tasks will be performed is the central and most critical element of this phase. Activities during this phase revolve around reviewing current practices, processes, and workflows.
The design phase is based on the findings and requirements identified in the previous phase. It involves activities related to specifying the details of an upgrade, addition, or entirely new system. During this phase, a systems blueprint is created using structured design tools such as CASE programs.
The implementation phase involves making the designed system operational through activities such as system testing, site preparation, management of system impact, organizational change management, and user training or retraining.
The operations/maturity phase consists of identifying possible future risks to the system, such as power outages, construction disruptions, and service attacks.
The evaluation phase, the sixth and final phase, involves assessment against pre-development needs, requirements, and criteria. This phase can be considered a needs assessment or readiness assessment. The four main areas of an EHR readiness assessment are organizational culture, management and leadership, operational readiness, and technical readiness (Ajami, Ketabi, Isfahani & Heidari, 2011).
EHR Readiness Assessment
In the organizational culture area, the overall perception of EHR, along with patient involvement and the attitudes of physicians and staff, are evaluated.
The management and leadership area addresses four readiness components: strategic planning, financial readiness, executive team preparedness, and care management and quality improvement. This area requires planning before moving forward and may involve potential process development.
Operational readiness includes care management protocols, EHR procedures and policies, and workflow design (Wright, 2014). This area allows for the identification of potential barriers to EHR adoption.
Technical readiness is an evaluation of the organization's IT management capabilities and its technical environment. Readiness indicators in this area help identify sections requiring additional IT planning and procurement. Because EHRs depend on computers and the collection of results, processes may be affected or slowed during this assessment phase.
References
Ajami, S., Ketabi, S., Isfahani, S., & Heidari, A. (2011). Readiness assessment of electronic health records implementation. Acta Informatica Medica, 19(4), 224. http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/aim.2011.19.224-227
Joukes, E., Cornet, R., de Bruijne, M., & de Keizer, N. (2016). Eliciting end-user expectations to guide the implementation process of a new electronic health record: A case study using concept mapping. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 87, 111–117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.12.014
Vallette, M., & Caldwell, B. (2013). Patient and provider perspectives on electronic health record (EHR) information access and rights. Proceedings of the International Symposium of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare, 2(1), 64–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2327857913021013
Wright, L. (2014). Thinking holistically about EHR selection and implementation. Behavioral Healthcare, 34(1), 18–21. Retrieved from http://go.galegroup.com/ps/anonymous?id=GALE%7CA364855467&sid=googleScholar&v=2.1&it=r&linkaccess=fulltext&issn=19317093&p=AONE&sw=w&authCount=1&isAnonymousEntry=true
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.