EHR Implementation: HIT Systems Life Cycle Guide
This paper examines the Health Information Technology (HIT) systems life cycle as it applies to Electronic Health Records (EHR). It outlines the six principal phases of the information systems life cycle — initiation, analysis, design, implementation, operations/maturity, and evaluation — and explains how each phase contributes to selecting, deploying, and maintaining EHR systems. The paper also discusses EHR readiness assessment across four domains: organizational culture, management and leadership, operational readiness, and technical readiness. Additional coverage includes the composition and responsibilities of an EHR implementation steering committee, key product-selection criteria, and the three primary staff training approaches used during EHR implementation.
- Introduction to EHR and the HIT Systems Life Cycle: Defines EHR and introduces the HIT life cycle
- The Six Phases of the Information Systems Life Cycle: Details each of the six lifecycle phases
- EHR Readiness Assessment: Four-domain framework for assessing EHR readiness
- The EHR Implementation Steering Committee: Team roles essential to successful EHR rollout
- Product Selection Criteria and Training Methods: Vendor selection factors and three training approaches
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper progresses logically through each phase of the systems life cycle before moving to practical implementation concerns, giving readers a coherent framework before addressing specific details.
- Numbered phases and bulleted team-member lists improve scannability and make complex procedural content easy to follow.
- The paper consistently connects abstract lifecycle concepts to concrete EHR tasks, such as linking the evaluation phase directly to a four-domain readiness assessment.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates applied synthesis: it draws on peer-reviewed sources (Ajami et al., 2011; Joukes et al., 2016; Wright, 2014) to anchor each phase or recommendation in established research, then explains how each cited concept functions in an operational EHR setting. This technique grounds practitioner-oriented content in academic evidence without losing practical focus.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a definition of EHR and its purpose, then walks through the six-phase HIT systems life cycle. It narrows progressively — from life cycle overview, to readiness assessment domains, to team composition, and finally to vendor selection and staff training methods. Each section builds on the previous, following the natural sequence of an EHR adoption project from planning to go-live.
Introduction to EHR and the HIT Systems Life Cycle
The Health Information Technology (HIT) systems life cycle encompasses several broad categories, one of the most significant being Electronic Health Records (EHRs). EHRs are patient-centered, real-time records that allow users to retrieve information instantly, wherever and whenever it is needed. Simply put, EHRs are computerized, digital versions of a patient's paper charts. They contain medications, radiology images, test and lab results, immunization dates, and the patient's medical history. EHRs also provide access to evidence-based tools that providers can use when making decisions about a patient's care. In addition to streamlining and automating a provider's workflow, EHRs increase the accuracy and organization of patient information.
References
Ajami, S., Ketabi, S., Isfahani, S., & Heidari, A. (2011). Readiness assessment of electronic health records implementation. Acta Informatica Medica, 19(4), 224. http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/aim.2011.19.224-227
Joukes, E., Cornet, R., de Bruijne, M., & de Keizer, N. (2016). Eliciting end-user expectations to guide the implementation process of a new electronic health record: A case study using concept mapping. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 87, 111–117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.12.014
Vallette, M., & Caldwell, B. (2013). Patient and provider perspectives on electronic health record (EHR) information access and rights. Proceedings of the International Symposium of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare, 2(1), 64–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2327857913021013
Wright, L. (2014). Thinking holistically about EHR selection and implementation. Behavioral Healthcare, 34(1), 18–21. Retrieved from http://go.galegroup.com/ps/anonymous?id=GALE%7CA364855467&sid=googleScholar&v=2.1&it=r&linkaccess=fulltext&issn=19317093&p=AONE&sw=w&authCount=1&isAnonymousEntry=true
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.