This paper analyzes Ralph Waldo Emerson's essay "Self-Reliance," arguing that bravery is a twofold requirement for achieving self-reliance: first, the individual must honestly know and trust his or her own inner convictions; second, the individual must withstand external societal pressure to conform. Drawing on key passages from "Self-Reliance" as well as Emerson's related essays "Nature" and "The American Scholar," the paper traces how Emerson connects inner honesty to the divine oversoul, critiques foolish consistency, and challenges readers to resist conformity in all its forms — including social guilt around charity — in order to live according to their own genuine principles.
The paper models close reading of a primary literary text. Rather than paraphrasing broadly, the student selects specific passages and unpacks their meaning in relation to a central thesis — that self-reliance requires a twofold act of bravery. This technique anchors interpretation in the text and prevents unsupported generalizations.
The paper opens with a clear thesis identifying bravery's two dimensions. It then moves through Emerson's argument in sequence: internal self-knowledge and trust, the challenge of societal nonconformity, the critique of foolish consistency, the call for independent thought in "The American Scholar," the surprising discussion of charity, and finally Emerson's closing appeal to inner principles. Each section corresponds to a distinct stage in Emerson's essay, making the analysis easy to follow.
Ralph Waldo Emerson's famous essay "Self-Reliance" revolves around two key ideas: conformity and consistency. Emerson argues that in order for an individual to be self-reliant, he or she must come to terms with both of these ideas. The individual must fight a brave battle and be courageous in order to achieve self-reliance. Bravery is a twofold process for Emerson. First, the individual must be brave internally and understand what he or she truly wants. Second, the individual must be willing to brave the external criticism of society while pursuing his or her own path in life.
The first battle requires that a person know him or herself very well. The opening pages of the essay are concerned with trusting oneself. Emerson says that individuals must "believe your own thought, to believe that what is true for you in your private heart is true for all men — that is genius" (Emerson 147). The foundational step in the process of bravery is to understand what is in one's heart and to recognize what one believes to be true.
Emerson argues that all great men have already done this. These great men have trusted their innermost hearts, which Emerson sees as a reflection of the divine being:
"Trust thyself: every heart vibrates to that iron string… Great men have always done so, and confided themselves childlike to the genius of their age, betraying their perception that the absolutely trustworthy was seated at their heart, working through their hands, predominating in all their being." (Emerson 148)
Emerson believed that if the individual was brave and honest about what he or she understood about the world, that understanding would be the truth. If people can achieve that, then the power working through them is part of the divine soul that Emerson called the oversoul. People can connect to the oversoul, according to Emerson's essay "Nature," when they have a moment of mystical understanding (Lewis). This is the highest achievement, and Emerson believes that people must be brave and sincere to reach it (Lewis).
If people are brave and sincere, they will naturally recognize that they have goodness in their hearts. Emerson recounts a story from his youth in which an elder posed a religious question to him. Emerson challenged the validity of such an external question, asking, "What have I to do with the sacredness of tradition, if I live wholly from within?" (Emerson 149). When the elder questioned how Emerson would know whether his impulses came from a good or evil source, Emerson answered, "They do not seem to me to be such; but if I am the Devil's child, I will live then from the Devil" (Emerson 150). Emerson understood himself and was able to trust himself from a very young age, and through his writing he tries to encourage others to do the same.
Finding the bravery within oneself to think independently is only half of the challenge. People must then face the opposition of the world. This is where bravery becomes a necessity. At this point in the essay, Emerson launches into a sharp critique of conformity, recognizing how difficult it is to be an individual in the face of society. "It is easy in the world to live after the world's opinion; it is easy in solitude to live after your own; but the great man is he who in the midst of the crowd keeps with perfect sweetness the independence of solitude" (Emerson 151). As difficult as this is to achieve, Emerson maintains it is a necessity, because "conforming to usages that have become dead to you… scatters your force" (Emerson 151). People become weak in the face of society if they do not first know who they are.
Emerson recognizes how brave the individual will have to be in order to stand apart from society. Going against its expectations will be terribly challenging. "For nonconformity the world whips you with its displeasure" (Emerson 152). Facing the "sour face" of society will be the greatest challenge to the nonconformist. Emerson's portrait of society is quite unflattering in this section. He draws a distinction between a brave person maintaining individuality before the educated or "cultivated" classes and maintaining that same bravery against "the unintelligent brute force that lies at the bottom of society" (Emerson 152). This latter force is far more formidable, and Emerson says it will take "the habit of magnanimity and religion to treat it godlike as a trifle of no concernment" (Emerson 152).
It is not people of sense and education that the individual must face so bravely, but the mass of humanity that may be uneducated and quick to judge. These are the people most likely to misunderstand and threaten the individual.
The last few lines of "Self-Reliance" call on readers to be brave and to trust in themselves because, ultimately, the only way for people to be happy is for them to be true to themselves. "Nothing can bring you peace but yourself. Nothing can bring you peace but the triumph of principles" (Emerson 168). Those principles are derived from within. People must determine what is right for themselves — and Emerson acknowledges the guidance of a divine being in that process. People must then brave the limits that society will attempt to impose in its constant search for conformity. Once people have learned to trust their innermost hearts and have asserted their individuality in the face of society, they are ready to follow their own principles — the true goal of Emersonian self-reliance.
You’re 59% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.