This paper examines the role of effective training strategies in supporting employee career development and long-term organizational stability. Drawing on research about small and medium enterprises, it explores how training formality correlates with organizational size and firm type. The paper argues that a well-designed training program must align with a company's specific structure, convey its values and ethical priorities, and foster a sense of belonging among employees. It also emphasizes the importance of individualized performance evaluation and open dialogue between employees and human resources as tools for improving both training outcomes and employee engagement.
There are few features that define an organization as directly and as fully as its employees. The knowledge, skill sets, and loyalty necessary to afford a company success must all be embodied by its workforce. While recruitment and screening play a significant part in ensuring that personnel are an adequate fit, it is also critical that the hiring company employ training strategies both for initiation into the company and for the ongoing advancement of skills. An effective and proven training strategy is the best path to long-term career development, which can produce sustained company stability and the growth of a positive internal culture.
As the discussion below shows, training is required to help employees navigate a combination of specific procedures, practices, and expectations within a given company, as well as the various ways in which objectives, companies, and industries undergo change. As eCornell (2010) reports, "the many challenges associated with the changing nature of work and the workplace environment are very real for every organization. Rapid change requires a skilled, knowledgeable workforce with employees who are adaptive, flexible and focused on the future" (eCornell, p. 1). It is for this reason that it is absolutely essential for an employing firm to provide its employees with a clear, streamlined, and attainable training program. When done properly, the process of training should bring comfort and clarity to employees as they learn new skills on the job.
There are, of course, a wide range of potential training methods and philosophies that might be employed depending upon the nature of an organization, its practical demands, and its expectations of employees. Among these various training methods, some are more effective than others. Choosing the training strategy most compatible with the size, scope, and structure of a company is particularly important. A great deal of research confirms the importance of designing a best-fit training approach.
To this end, the article by Kotey and Folker (2007) discusses the correlation between training approaches and organizational scale. Using only small and medium organizations as its sample, the article examines the level of formality present in training procedures as a function of firm size. This research drew on a sample of 448 family firms and 470 nonfamily firms, and it found distinctions between the approaches taken at the two types of firms in addition to differences correlating size with formality. Research findings showed that in the smallest firms, informal training processes dominated. However, as firms grew larger, these processes became gradually more formal in their nature and structure. Perhaps the most compelling finding is that in early growth stages, family firms tend to demonstrate a greater formality in training approaches than nonfamily firms. Ultimately, the research confirms that size is a major driver of how training strategies are designed, supporting the notion that training must largely be constructed with the specific characteristics of the hiring organization as the foremost determinant. For further context on small and medium-sized enterprises and their management practices, established research provides a useful foundation.
A good training process will not only offer education and instruction on performing one's responsibilities and working within company procedural norms; it should also help to demonstrate the company's value system, convey its ethical priorities, induce a sense of belonging within its culture, and reinforce a consistency of company identity. This means that certain organizational characteristics must be captured through the training process in addition to the practical requirements of knowledge transfer.
Research on organizational culture consistently shows that employees who feel connected to a company's mission and values are more engaged and productive. Training is one of the most direct mechanisms through which that connection can be established from the outset of employment. When employees understand not just what to do but why it matters within the broader organizational context, they are better positioned to contribute meaningfully over the long term.
"Tailoring evaluations to individual employee strengths"
This discussion demonstrates that while training is critical in and of itself, it must be properly approached in order to achieve its desired impact. This means devising a strategy that is suited to both the nature of the company and to the personnel in whom this training will be invested. Organizations that commit to thoughtful, individualized, and culturally informed training programs are best positioned to foster long-term career development and sustained organizational success.
You’re 73% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.