Enlightenment Philosophes, Literature, and Social Contract Theory
This paper addresses six core questions about the Enlightenment, covering the philosophes and their reform achievements, the literary forms that emerged during the period, Phillis Wheatley's poetry, genre painting, Rousseau's critique of reason, and a comparative analysis of Thomas Hobbes and John Locke. The paper contrasts Hobbes's pessimistic view of human nature in Leviathan with Locke's rational optimism in Of Civil Government, examining how each thinker's assumptions about humankind shaped their distinct theories of the social contract and the legitimate basis of government authority.
- The Philosophes and the Enlightenment Reform Movement: Who the philosophes were and their reform legacy
- Literary Forms of the Enlightenment: Essay and novel as new Enlightenment literary genres
- Phillis Wheatley and African Salvation: Wheatley's argument for racial equality through Christianity
- Genre Painting in the Eighteenth Century: Definition and example of everyday-life painting
- Rousseau's Critique of Reason and Natural Man: Rousseau's preference for nature over rational society
- Hobbes vs. Locke: Human Nature and the Social Contract: Contrasting theories of sovereignty and natural rights
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Concise, direct answers that address each prompt without padding, demonstrating strong command of the material.
- The Hobbes–Locke comparison is particularly strong: it grounds each philosopher's political theory in their underlying view of human nature before connecting those views to concrete social contract positions.
- Specific textual references — Leviathan, Of Civil Government, Wollstonecraft's "Vindication," Richardson's Pamela — anchor abstract claims in primary sources.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates effective comparative analysis. Rather than describing Hobbes and Locke in isolation, it organizes their ideas around a single axis of contrast — human nature — and then traces how that contrast produces divergent conclusions about sovereignty, rights, and the social contract. This structure keeps the comparison coherent and prevents the response from becoming a list of disconnected facts.
Structure breakdown
The paper is organized as a short-answer Q&A. Questions 1–5 are brief definitional and interpretive responses, each focused on a single concept (the philosophes, literary forms, Wheatley's poem, genre painting, Rousseau). Question 6 is a longer comparative essay that synthesizes two philosophers across shared themes, forming the intellectual centerpiece of the paper.
The Philosophes and the Enlightenment Reform Movement
The philosophes were the founders of what came to be known as the Enlightenment — individuals such as Voltaire and Montesquieu who demanded that governments honor the rights of all human beings, not simply those of high birth. Their conviction in the power of reason led them to champion the expansion of equal rights to all people. Authors such as Mary Wollstonecraft created the architecture for what would eventually become equal rights for women, much as Cesare Beccaria laid the foundation of modern prison and judicial reform, and John Locke advanced the idea of a government that could be dissolved if the sovereign failed to protect the rights of the people.
Literary Forms of the Enlightenment
Two major forms of literature emerged during the Enlightenment: the journalistic essay and the modern novel. A prominent example of the journalistic essay is Mary Wollstonecraft's A Vindication of the Rights of Woman (1792). The modern novel is exemplified by Pamela, or Virtue Rewarded by Samuel Richardson (1740).
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.