Ideal Personality Traits for Entrepreneurial Success
This paper presents a research proposal examining the personality traits most closely associated with entrepreneurial success. The author situates the study within a long intellectual tradition — from Adam Smith and Joseph Schumpeter to contemporary management scholars — and distinguishes between approaches that categorize entrepreneurs by type and those that isolate individual traits. The proposal outlines a mixed-source methodology combining peer-reviewed journal articles, historical writings, and lay press sources, including firsthand accounts from entrepreneurs themselves. The goal is to synthesize current theory on what differentiates entrepreneurs from ordinary managers and to build a coherent framework around the psychology of entrepreneurial thinking and decision-making.
- Introduction and Research Focus: Framing entrepreneurial traits as the research subject
- Approaches to Studying Entrepreneurial Traits: Typology vs. individual trait frameworks compared
- Sources and Methodology: Academic journals and historical texts as primary sources
- Lay and Practitioner Perspectives: Magazine sources and firsthand entrepreneur accounts
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The proposal clearly situates its topic within both historical and contemporary intellectual traditions, grounding the study in credible, named authorities such as Adam Smith and Joseph Schumpeter.
- It acknowledges two distinct scholarly approaches — categorical typology versus individual trait analysis — demonstrating awareness of methodological debate in the field.
- The methodology section is transparent and practical, explaining why both academic and lay sources are appropriate given the pre-academic origins of entrepreneurship discourse.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates effective research scoping: rather than attempting to cover all of entrepreneurship, the author narrows the inquiry specifically to personality traits, then further distinguishes between categorization frameworks and individual-trait frameworks. This scoping strategy — name the broad field, identify a sub-question, and justify the chosen angle — is a strong model for any research proposal introduction.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a statement of the research subject and its historical legitimacy, moves to narrow the focus to personality traits and contrasting methodological approaches, then outlines the planned sources in two phases: academic journals and historical texts first, followed by magazine, newspaper, and firsthand practitioner sources. A Works Cited section closes the paper. The structure is compact and purposeful, appropriate for an undergraduate research proposal.
Introduction and Research Focus
The proposed research subject is the traits most ideal for entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurs have long been recognized as a distinct component of the economic system, and their unique contributions have been cited by Adam Smith, John Stuart Mill, and Joseph Schumpeter (McDaniel, 2005). Scholars have further sought to determine the different ways in which entrepreneurs think and make decisions compared to other managers (Minniti et al., 2006). This research intends to explore this issue in depth and to synthesize current theories with respect to the differences between entrepreneurs and ordinary managers.
Approaches to Studying Entrepreneurial Traits
There are several elements of what makes a successful entrepreneur. The focus of this research will be on personality traits specifically. Some discussion on the subject attempts to categorize entrepreneurs by type (Zahorsky, 2009), while other discussion takes a more clinical approach and addresses the issue in terms of individual traits rather than bundles of traits (Stolze, 1999). Both frameworks offer valuable insight and will be examined in relation to one another.
Sources and Methodology
A variety of sources will be utilized to gather this information. The subject has been studied academically in both management and psychological circles, so peer-reviewed journal articles will serve as the foundation for establishing an academic framework. Because the subject of entrepreneurship and entrepreneurial success pre-dates modern academic discourse, it would be unreasonable to discount the value of the lay press on this subject. The research will begin by examining the historical writings of key authors such as Smith and Schumpeter.
Works Cited
McDaniel, Bruce A. "A Contemporary View of Joseph A. Schumpeter's Theory of the Entrepreneur." Journal of Economic Issues, vol. 39, 2005.
Minniti, M., Zacharakis, A., Spinelli, S., Rice, M., and Habbershon, T. Entrepreneurship. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing, 2006.
Zahorsky, Darrell. "The 9 Personality Types of Entrepreneurs." About.com, 2009.
Stolze, William J. Start Up: An Entrepreneur's Guide to Launching and Managing a New Business. Franklin Lakes, NJ: Career Press, 1999.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.