This paper explores an environmental justice case involving Colney & Pitts Company, a U.S. pharmaceutical firm seeking to establish a manufacturing plant in Kenya's Aberdares mountain range to harvest medicinal evergreen trees used by the Kikuyu people. The paper defines environmental justice, identifies key stakeholders and their competing philosophies, and analyzes the tensions arising from the conflict between commercial pharmaceutical interests and indigenous land rights. Environmental advocacy organizations are also examined as counterweights to corporate development priorities. The paper argues that a balanced resolution must account for the rights and well-being of all stakeholders, particularly the indigenous Kikuyu community.
Environmental justice can be understood as the social justice dimension of environmental ethics, and it has contributed to the emergence of the environmental justice movement — a movement aimed at addressing the unfair allocation of toxic, dangerous, and hazardous waste facilities. The term can also be described as every individual's right to a safe, productive, healthy, and sustainable environment. In this context, "environment" encompasses physical, social, ecological, political, economic, and aesthetic surroundings. The conditions under which people's rights to such an environment are freely exercised constitute environmental justice. The concept is largely grounded in ideas drawn from civil rights, community organizing efforts, and public health (Warner & DeCosse, 2009).
As a leading pharmaceutical company in the United States, Colney & Pitts Company manufactures herbal remedies for various illnesses, including prostate cancer. In order to develop medicines for prostate disorders, the company seeks to establish a manufacturing plant in the Aberdares mountain ranges in Kenya. Research conducted by the Kikuyu tribe — who have lived in this mountain range for generations — identified an evergreen tree that has long been used as a remedy for prostatitis and genitourinary disorders. Given the high number of people suffering from prostate cancer in America and Europe, demand for medicines derived from these evergreen trees is substantial. As a result, Colney & Pitts Company has budgeted for the development of production activities in the region.
Several stakeholders are involved in this environmental problem, each with distinct philosophies or ethical perspectives underlying their positions. As the indigenous inhabitants of the Aberdares mountain range, the Kikuyu people are one of the primary stakeholders. Their ethical position holds that pharmaceutical companies from developed nations like the United States are destroying natural habitats for their own commercial interests. Colney & Pitts Company is the second major stakeholder; the company's position is that the growing population of prostate cancer patients outweighs the ecological value of the evergreen trees in the mountain region.
"Divergent goals of community, company, and advocates"
"Conflict resolution pathways and justice outcomes"
You’re 54% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.