Environmental Justice and Pharmaceutical Land Use in Kenya
This paper explores an environmental justice case involving Colney & Pitts Company, a U.S. pharmaceutical firm seeking to establish a manufacturing plant in Kenya's Aberdares mountain range to harvest medicinal evergreen trees used by the Kikuyu people. The paper defines environmental justice, identifies key stakeholders and their competing philosophies, and analyzes the tensions arising from the conflict between commercial pharmaceutical interests and indigenous land rights. Environmental advocacy organizations are also examined as counterweights to corporate development priorities. The paper argues that a balanced resolution must account for the rights and well-being of all stakeholders, particularly the indigenous Kikuyu community.
- Introduction to Environmental Justice: Defines environmental justice and its conceptual foundations
- The Environmental Problem: Pharmaceutical firm targets Kenyan medicinal trees
- Stakeholders and Their Philosophies: Key parties and their competing ethical positions
- Competing Priorities of the Stakeholders: Divergent goals of community, company, and advocates
- Tensions and Environmental Justice: Conflict resolution pathways and justice outcomes
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Clearly grounds the case study in an established theoretical framework — environmental justice — before applying it to a specific scenario, giving the analysis conceptual anchoring.
- Identifies multiple stakeholders with distinct philosophies, showing the student understands that environmental conflicts involve more than two opposing sides.
- Uses a realistic and ethically layered scenario (indigenous land rights versus global pharmaceutical demand) that naturally surfaces competing moral claims without overstating any single position.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates stakeholder mapping as an analytical method. Rather than arguing for one side, the student systematically identifies each party — the Kikuyu community, the pharmaceutical company, and two environmental organizations — and articulates the ethical reasoning behind each position. This technique is especially effective in applied ethics writing because it forces the writer to represent conflicting values fairly before moving to evaluation.
Structure breakdown
The paper follows a clear problem-analysis structure across five sections: (1) a conceptual introduction defining environmental justice, (2) presentation of the specific environmental problem, (3) stakeholder identification and ethical positioning, (4) analysis of competing priorities, and (5) a discussion of tensions and a gesture toward resolution. This five-part scaffold is well-suited to short applied ethics case studies at the undergraduate level.
Introduction to Environmental Justice
Environmental justice can be understood as the social justice dimension of environmental ethics, and it has contributed to the emergence of the environmental justice movement — a movement aimed at addressing the unfair allocation of toxic, dangerous, and hazardous waste facilities. The term can also be described as every individual's right to a safe, productive, healthy, and sustainable environment. In this context, "environment" encompasses physical, social, ecological, political, economic, and aesthetic surroundings. The conditions under which people's rights to such an environment are freely exercised constitute environmental justice. The concept is largely grounded in ideas drawn from civil rights, community organizing efforts, and public health (Warner & DeCosse, 2009).
The Environmental Problem
As a leading pharmaceutical company in the United States, Colney & Pitts Company manufactures herbal remedies for various illnesses, including prostate cancer. In order to develop medicines for prostate disorders, the company seeks to establish a manufacturing plant in the Aberdares mountain ranges in Kenya. Research conducted by the Kikuyu tribe — who have lived in this mountain range for generations — identified an evergreen tree that has long been used as a remedy for prostatitis and genitourinary disorders. Given the high number of people suffering from prostate cancer in America and Europe, demand for medicines derived from these evergreen trees is substantial. As a result, Colney & Pitts Company has budgeted for the development of production activities in the region.
Stakeholders and Their Philosophies
Several stakeholders are involved in this environmental problem, each with distinct philosophies or ethical perspectives underlying their positions. As the indigenous inhabitants of the Aberdares mountain range, the Kikuyu people are one of the primary stakeholders. Their ethical position holds that pharmaceutical companies from developed nations like the United States are destroying natural habitats for their own commercial interests. Colney & Pitts Company is the second major stakeholder; the company's position is that the growing population of prostate cancer patients outweighs the ecological value of the evergreen trees in the mountain region.
Additional stakeholders include Eco Smile, an organization committed to fostering environments that support healthy ecosystems, and the International Center for Ethno Botanical Research, which promotes the positive development of ecosystems alongside the advancement of tribal communities (Smith, 2011).
References
Smith, G. (2011, August 7). Environmental justice simulation. Retrieved January 12, 2012.
Warner, K. D., & DeCosse, D. (2009, May). Lesson five: Environmental justice. Retrieved from Santa Clara University website: http://www.scu.edu/ethics/practicing/focusareas/environmental_ethics/lesson5.html
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.