This paper examines how a Daily Mail article reporting on cardiometabolic health trends among U.S. adults represents the findings of a peer-reviewed study published in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology. The paper identifies key epidemiological concepts present in the media coverage — including the five W's of epidemiology and study sample size — and evaluates the accuracy of the media article's representation. It discusses notable omissions, such as disparities in sex and age, and the rounding of statistical figures. The paper concludes by describing how a healthcare provider might translate the study findings into patient-friendly language to support health literacy and encourage personal behavioral interventions.
The mass media article examined here is titled "Less than 7% of Americans Have Good Heart Health – with Minorities and Less Educated People Suffering the Most, Study Finds." The article appeared in the Daily Mail and was published on July 4, 2022. The peer-reviewed article cited in the mass media source is titled "Trends and Disparities in Cardiometabolic Health among U.S. Adults, 1999–2018," published in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
The authors of the peer-reviewed study found that the cardiometabolic health of American adults has been on a downward trend over the last two decades. As the authors indicate, a striking 93.2% of American adults have poor cardiometabolic health. The article also highlights the various disparities that exist in this domain.
Several epidemiological concepts are highlighted in the media article. One key concept is the identification of the basic principles of epidemiology — specifically, the five W's. These principles appear in the headline and the brief summary section that follows it: what (cardiometabolic health), who (adults), where (the United States), when (1999–2018), and how (rising prevalence of obesity and diabetes).
According to Curley (2020), "epidemiologists tend to use synonyms for the 5 W's: diagnosis or health event (what), person (who), place (where), time (when), and causes, risk factors, and modes of transmission (why/how)" (p. 192). A second epidemiological concept present in the media article is sample size, an important element of study design. The authors of the media article note that a total of 55,000 U.S. adults were assessed over a 10-year period.
Close analysis of both the media article and the original study reveals that the authors of the media article made reasonable attempts to represent the research accurately. However, certain information has been omitted or somewhat amplified. First, there is generalization and rounding of figures. Whereas the study reports that only 6.8% of U.S. adults could be considered healthy from a cardiometabolic standpoint, the media article presents this as 7%. This rounding may be intended to help readers more easily recall the key finding.
Second, some of the disparities highlighted in the study — particularly those related to sex and age — are omitted from the media article. The media authors instead focus exclusively on disparities related to education level and race. Finally, the broader implications of the study's findings are not adequately addressed in the media article, leaving readers without a clear understanding of what the findings mean for public health policy or individual behavior.
"Translates statistics into patient-friendly language"
"Cited sources in APA format"
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.