This paper examines the core ethical principles — autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice — as they apply to an end-of-life healthcare scenario involving a patient who executed a Durable Power of Attorney for Health Care (DPAHC). The paper identifies key issues surrounding whether the patient's documented wishes were honored when paramedics intervened against those wishes, analyzes what additional measures such as a Living Will or a formal Do Not Resuscitate order could have better protected the patient's stated preferences, and discusses the legal frameworks governing such decisions in certain states.
The paper demonstrates applied ethical analysis: it takes a theoretical framework (the four principles of bioethics) and systematically tests each principle against the facts of a specific case, identifying where principles conflict or reinforce one another. This technique is standard in bioethics and healthcare ethics writing and shows how abstract norms have practical clinical and legal consequences.
The paper opens by defining each ethical principle in turn and applying it to the scenario. It then shifts to issue identification — questioning whether the DPAHC adequately reflected the patient's wishes — before moving to a prescriptive conclusion that recommends stronger advance directive instruments (Living Wills, formal DNR orders) as protective measures. This introduction–analysis–prescription structure is well-suited to applied ethics case writing at the undergraduate level.
Several core bioethical principles apply to end-of-life healthcare cases involving advance directives: autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice. Each illuminates a different dimension of the tensions that arise when a patient's documented wishes conflict with the instincts of healthcare providers.
Autonomy means the ability to make independent, rational decisions about one's own care. In this scenario, the patient was able to exercise autonomous decision-making before the incident occurred. She was aware that her health was failing and took deliberate steps to document her preferences. She signed a Durable Power of Attorney for Health Care (DPAHC), which transferred her decision-making authority to her relatives in the event of her incapacitation. Her relatives were fully aware of her wish not to be intubated or artificially resuscitated. This agreement was specifically designed to transfer autonomy to her designated proxies should she become unable to speak for herself.
Beneficence — the obligation to act in the patient's best interest — is one of the primary concerns of all healthcare providers and is foundational to the Hippocratic Oath. This principle explains the paramedics' insistence that they were obligated to treat the woman, even though their actions were, according to her relatives, contrary to her clearly and coherently expressed wishes. The case highlights a frequent difficulty: even when a patient's wishes are known, healthcare providers feel compelled to do everything possible to preserve life, even when prolonging life through artificial means is itself regarded as harmful from the patient's perspective.
Nonmaleficence — the duty to do no harm and not to actively hurt the patient — is rendered especially complex for the on-call physician in this scenario. He is not merely withholding care; he is actively withdrawing life-preserving intervention made necessary by the paramedics' prior actions. Compounding this difficulty, he is the on-call physician rather than the woman's regular healthcare provider, and he does not know her or her relationship with her relatives well.
Justice in this context is served by honoring the patient's wishes, while also respecting legal protocols designed to ensure that lives are not ended against a person's will merely for the convenience or comfort of relatives. Balancing these considerations requires careful attention to both the patient's documented preferences and the procedural safeguards the law provides.
You’re 50% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.