This paper applies the framework of ethical relativism to a healthcare case involving Ana Lopez, an undocumented immigrant from southern Mexico who speaks Mixteco. Drawing on scholarly definitions of ethical relativism, the paper examines how cultural differences shape perceptions of health, healing, and emotional expression, and how healthcare workers can respond more respectfully to patients from diverse backgrounds. Topics include the role of traditional healers (curanderos), the impact of language barriers, the ethics of emergency medical intervention without consent, immigration status and patient rights, and the balance between patient autonomy and professional medical judgment. The paper argues that ethical relativism, properly understood, supports both cultural sensitivity and high-quality patient care.
According to the most basic tenets of ethical relativism, all points of view are equally valid. Differences in morality that are attributable to culture are inevitable in a pluralistic, heterogeneous society. Especially in the field of healthcare, ethical relativism can be a useful perspective from which to examine dilemmas like the one involving Ana Lopez.
Ethical relativism allows for cultural nuances with regard to perceptions of health, healing, and wellness. Moreover, attitudes towards family, childcare, birth, and gender are all influenced by culture. The healthcare worker must take care not to impose the dominant culture upon those whose belief systems differ. In this case, the nurse made a grave error in refusing to acknowledge the cultural relevance of a curandero. The nurse categorically refused to allow the intervention of a traditional healer without inquiring as to what exactly the curandero would do. This simple act of refusal represents one of the worst ways in which healthcare workers can respond to people in crisis. The nurse should have, at the very least, inquired about what the curandero does, what role the curandero plays in the patient's life, and made an informed decision based on logic and facts rather than fear.
The language barrier poses one of the gravest problems for both Ana and the healthcare team. Ana is all but helpless to communicate, which contributes to the perception that she does not care about her baby. In fact, Ana most probably does care deeply about her baby. The nursing staff assumes that because Ana is uncommunicative, something must be wrong with the patient. Instead of leaping to an erroneous conclusion, the nursing staff would do well to put themselves in Ana's position. If an English-speaking American needed urgent care in Oaxaca, the frustration of not being able to speak would undoubtedly affect the ability to express emotions.
Furthermore, Ana's emotional state is a personal matter. Each person deals with crisis differently, and culture influences the expression of emotion as well. It is also possible that Ana has complicated feelings about a baby with severe birth defects. In many traditional cultures, and especially among the poor, babies with significant medical needs can place an inordinate burden on the community. Research on neonatal encephalopathy shows it to be a serious condition that may require far more resources than Ana's family is able to provide. Rather than viewing Ana's reaction as abnormal, it would be more helpful to consider the broader picture — including whether long-term care for the baby is even feasible.
If given the opportunity to approach the hospital administrator, a specific request should be made for a translator who not only understands Mixteco but also the culture and values of southern Mexico. If a Mixteco translator is unavailable, it might be possible to find a Spanish translator who understands Ana's point of view and can act as a bridge between the two cultures. Ana and her family cannot reasonably expect their language to be understood in an English-speaking society, but what they should be able to expect — and receive — is respect.
Offering the emergency caesarian section was the right decision, even without the express consent of Ana and her family. In emergency situations, doctors and nurses must make quick decisions with limited information at hand, and because a baby was involved, the caesarian was necessary.
During a crisis such as this one, it is crucial that Ana has access to her family and to anything that helps her feel comfortable. Allowing regular and frequent visits will alleviate the sense of pain and social isolation that Ana must be experiencing under these circumstances. The fact that Ana and possibly her family members lack legal immigration papers is irrelevant insofar as the humanitarian obligation to care for any patient in need.
"Curanderos and cultural approaches to healing"
"Immigration status and healthcare worker obligations"
Macklin, R. (1998). Ethical relativism in a multicultural society. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 8(1).
"Neonatal encephalopathy." (2011). Newborn Services Clinical Guideline. Retrieved from http://www.adhb.govt.nz/newborn/guidelines/neurology/NE.htm
Slick, M. Ethical relativism. CARM. Retrieved from http://carm.org/ethical-relativism
van Eerden, P., & Bernstein, P. S. (2003). Summary of the publication, "Neonatal Encephalopathy and Cerebral Palsy: Defining the Pathogenesis and Pathophysiology," by the ACOG Task Force on Neonatal Encephalopathy and Cerebral Palsy. Medscape. Retrieved from
Velasquez, M., Andre, C., Shanks, T. S. J., & Meyer, M. J. (1992). Ethical relativism. Santa Clara University. Retrieved from http://www.scu.edu/ethics/practicing/decision/ethicalrelativism.html
"What is Ethical Relativism?" Sheldon Chumir Foundation for Ethics in Leadership. Retrieved from
You’re 51% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.