European Views of the Ottomans: Art, Trade & Reformation
This paper examines how and why European attitudes toward the Ottoman Empire shifted from hostility to fascination between the sixteenth and eighteenth centuries. Drawing on articles by Charlotte Colding Smith, Lisa Jardine, and Ogier Ghiselin de Busbecq, the paper identifies two primary drivers of this transformation: the Protestant Reformation, which weakened the Catholic Church's influence and opened new trade and diplomatic channels, and a growing European appetite for cultural imagery of Ottoman dress, customs, and daily life. Together, these forces replaced militaristic depictions of the "Turks" with exotic, humanizing portrayals that reshaped Western perception of the Ottoman people.
- Introduction: Context of Christian–Ottoman conflict and paper scope
- The Protestant Rebellion and the Shifting European Order: Reformation weakens Church, opens Ottoman trade
- De-Emphasizing the 'Turks' as Militant Through Cultural Images: Costume books and diplomats humanize Ottoman people
- Conclusion: Synthesis: religion and culture reshaped European perception
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper deploys a clear two-part thesis — religious change and cultural curiosity — and sustains both threads across distinct body sections rather than conflating them.
- Primary source quotations (de Busbecq's vivid description of Buda, the depiction of the Janissaries) are used as illustrative evidence rather than mere decoration, grounding abstract claims in concrete textual detail.
- The conclusion successfully synthesizes the argument by linking the socio-political realignment of Europe with the specific image-making practices examined in the body, avoiding mere repetition.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper exemplifies comparative source analysis: it triangulates three different types of sources — a historical-diplomatic memoir (de Busbecq), a scholarly journal article on trade policy (Jardine), and a material-culture study of costume books (Smith) — to build a single, unified argument. This technique shows how multiple disciplinary lenses can converge on the same historical phenomenon.
Structure breakdown
The paper follows a four-part structure: an introductory frame situating the topic in centuries of Christian–Muslim conflict; a first body section on the Reformation as the political catalyst; a second body section on cultural publications and diplomatic writing as image-making tools; and a brief but integrative conclusion. Each body section anchors its claims in a named scholar or primary source, giving the argument a traceable evidential chain.
Introduction
For centuries during the Middle Ages, Europe had been at war with Muslims of the Middle East. There had been Crusades (beginning in the eleventh century), wars for the Holy Lands, and conflicts of great consequence — such as the Battle of Lepanto in 1571. Charles V had struggled to combat both the invading Ottomans and the Protestant rebellion in his own kingdom during the first half of the sixteenth century, illustrating just how dramatic the conflict between the West and the Middle East had become. Yet the tension that had existed for so long began to dissipate as the Ottoman Empire started to decline. Russia grew in power during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, and the West was rapidly modernizing. The Ottoman Empire itself was changing, and the new dynamics of modern life played a significant role in the way that some Europeans saw and constructed images of the Ottomans — images that emphasized positive, "exotic," or less threatening features of Ottoman society.
This paper examines three works by Smith, Jardine, and de Busbecq and identifies the main reasons why European eyes softened and grew more appreciative toward the Ottomans: specifically, the Protestant Reformation and a new interest in Ottoman culture.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.