Essay Undergraduate 583 words

Expansive Learning and Digital Technology in Education

~3 min read

Abstract

This paper explores the evolution of learning theory from the transfer model—which assumes knowledge flows unidirectionally from teacher to student—to expansive learning, which emphasizes the student's motivation and reciprocal interaction with instructors. The author argues that expansive learning in traditional brick-and-mortar universities enables students to expand their influence over their lives through engagement with cultural and social expectations. However, the digital revolution in formal education has reintroduced the transfer model as a commodity-driven marketplace, marginalizing both students and teachers from content creation. The paper then examines Brockmeier's theory of memory as a dynamic process shaped by past experiences, present consciousness, and future expectations, influenced significantly by cultural and social contexts. Together, these frameworks illustrate how learning and memory are inseparable from cultural and social identity formation.

📝 How to Write This Type of Paper Writing guide — click to expand

▼

What makes this paper effective

Uses vivid metaphors (finger in stream eddy currents) to make abstract psychological concepts concrete and memorable.
Establishes clear contrasts between competing frameworks (transfer vs. expansive learning; traditional vs. digital education) to highlight key distinctions.
Synthesizes two distinct theoretical domains—learning theory and memory studies—to argue for the centrality of cultural and social context across both.
Engages with academic sources thoughtfully, moving beyond summary to interpret and extend theoretical implications.

Key academic technique demonstrated

The paper demonstrates effective conceptual synthesis and comparative analysis. Rather than treating Schraube & Marvakis and Brockmeier as separate topics, the author uses both to develop a unified argument about how society shapes both learning and memory. The paper also models how to deconstruct and reframe a metaphor (the eddy-currents image) to clarify its theoretical implications—a technique common in interpretive and theoretical writing.

Structure breakdown

The paper opens with learning theory, moving from traditional transfer models through expansive learning to the problem created by digital commodification. It then shifts to memory theory, using Brockmeier to explain how consciousness and culture interact. The closing sections implicitly connect these domains: both learning and memory are shaped by cultural and social forces, making identity formation a sociocultural process. This movement from education to psychology to sociocultural implications creates a nested argument rather than parallel discussions.

The Transfer Model and Expansive Learning

The transfer model of learning, when taken to its extreme, assumes that the act of teaching implies learning occurs (Schraube & Marvakis, 2015). From this perspective, as long as the teacher teaches, the student will learn. The flow of knowledge is unidirectional. However, more contemporary theories of learning account for an individual student's motivation, willingness, and ability to learn. Other models incorporate reciprocal interactions between teacher and student. When a student seeks to expand their influence over their lives—a process called expansive learning—society necessarily influences the learning choices made by the student. Expanding one's influence over one's life requires consideration of cultural and social expectations. Learning therefore becomes a mechanism through which a person increases their ability to make cultural and social contributions, which in turn increases their value to society and thus their security. According to Schraube and Marvakis (2015), the expansive learning process takes place at brick-and-mortar colleges and universities.

Digital Learning and the Commodification of Education

The expansive learning process stands in stark contrast to the digital revolution in formal learning environments (Schraube & Marvakis, 2015). Once again, the transfer model appears to be emerging as the dominant model in the learning marketplace. Course content, institutional and instructor reputations, and convenience are commodities to be bought and sold. What is lost is the community of learning that can only be found on a brick-and-mortar campus. Accordingly, Schraube and Marvakis (2015) refer to the new commodity as frozen because students and even teachers are increasingly marginalized from the creation of these products. The logical conclusion is that society will suffer accordingly, because learning outcomes will be less a product of cultural and social expectations and more a product of the education marketplace.

Memory, Consciousness, and Cultural Identity

Brockmeier (2002) strips away pedestrian assumptions about memory and its role in our lives. An individual's mind and its remembering and forgetting processes are like a finger stuck into the stream of time. However, instead of a continuous flow in one direction, the finger finds a place filled with eddy currents. Our minds are therefore continuously buffeted between past memories, the influences of our present cognitive and psychological state, and our expectations for the future. Since our mind is the main player in this interpretive process, a Freudian perspective would assume that the interpretations of past events are influenced by both the conscious and unconscious mind. This model places equivalent importance on the processes of remembering and forgetting, which stands in stark contrast to a historical emphasis on remembering as the only "good" memory outcome and vilification of forgetting.

1 Locked Section · 165 words remaining

The Role of Society in Shaping Learning and Remembrance · 165 words

"Society's influence on consciousness, identity formation, and group membership"

You’re 71% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.

130,000+ paper examples AI writing assistant Citation generator Cancel anytime

Key Concepts in This Paper

Expansive Learning Transfer Model Digital Commodification Memory and Forgetting Cultural Identity Eddy Currents Educational Marketplace Sociocultural Learning