Comparing Expository Essays: Fish Cleaning vs. Art of Cookery
This paper compares two expository essays — Poyssick's guide on cleaning a fish and an excerpt from "The Art of Cookery" on hosting a dinner — by examining their shared rhetorical purpose, organizational strategies, and audience awareness. The analysis finds that both essays aim to inform rather than persuade, and both employ informative process as a development method. However, they differ in primary organization: Poyssick structures his essay by topic, while "The Art of Cookery" follows a time-order sequence of numbered maxims. The paper evaluates the effectiveness of each writer's choices and concludes with a comparative summary of their similarities and differences.
- Rhetorical Purpose of Both Essays: Both essays identified as expository and informative
- Organizational Methods and Development: Topic order vs. time order organization compared
- Evaluating Each Author's Structural Choices: Effectiveness of each author's organizational decisions
- Similarities and Differences Between the Essays: Final comparative summary of both essays
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper applies consistent analytical categories — rhetorical purpose, organizational method, and audience awareness — to both texts, giving the comparison a clear evaluative framework.
- It avoids mere description by evaluating why each author's organizational choice was appropriate for their subject and audience, adding critical depth.
- The conclusion effectively synthesizes both similarities and differences, reinforcing the comparative structure maintained throughout.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates the point-by-point comparison technique, analyzing both texts against the same criteria in each section rather than treating each essay in isolation. This method keeps the argument focused and prevents the analysis from becoming a series of disconnected summaries.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens by establishing the shared rhetorical category (expository), then examines each essay's primary and secondary organizational methods, evaluates the effectiveness of those choices, and closes with a comparative summary. This four-part structure moves logically from classification to analysis to evaluation to synthesis, a pattern well suited to comparative literary analysis at the undergraduate level.
Rhetorical Purpose of Both Essays
The art of having a guest over for dinner and the various ways to clean a fish are two topics that both lend themselves to expository writing. Both essays provide step-by-step examples to explain the process of these events. As a result, both are expository in nature. Their rhetorical purpose is not to persuade, but simply to inform — relying on fact rather than opinion.
Organizational Methods and Development
Poyssick's article is organized primarily by topic. At the beginning of his essay, he points out that three main ways exist to clean a fish, and he organizes the entire piece around these topics. Within this structure, Poyssick also uses informative process to explain to the reader how he or she might replicate what is described in each topic.
Unlike Poyssick's essay, The Art of Cookery is developed using primarily time order. This can be observed in the numbered sentences that make up the essay. The author moves from preparations before the meal — such as choosing the tablecloth — to the end of the meal and clearing the dishes. A secondary method of development is informative process, which the author uses to explain to the reader how to achieve a specific outcome.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.