This paper offers a comparative analysis of William Faulkner's "A Rose for Emily" (1930) and Flannery O'Connor's "Good Country People" (1955), arguing that both short stories share the dominant theme of "the fall of the high and mighty individual." Through an examination of three fictional elements — plot structure, characterization, and point-of-view — the paper traces how Emily's moral degeneration and Joy/Hulga's descent from idealism to disillusionment are shaped by their antagonistic relationships with their respective societies. While the characters share similar fates and abrasive personalities, Faulkner and O'Connor employ markedly different narrative techniques to illustrate each heroine's downfall.
Towards the mid-20th century, society was in a state of structural transformation, wherein a new order was emerging to reshape communities across the world. This was the social reality that writers William Faulkner and Flannery O'Connor recognized in their literary works at the time "A Rose for Emily" (1930) and "Good Country People" (1955) were written and published. Both short stories carry the theme of "the fall of the high and mighty individual," as represented by the main characters Emily and Joy/Hulga.
The following discussion probes this theme through a comparative analysis. The paper posits that both stories carry the fall of the highly moral and intellectual individual as their dominant theme. This theme is supported by three elements of fiction: plot structure, characterization, and point-of-view (POV). In this paper, "the fall" is illustrated in two ways: first, through Emily's fall into moral degeneration as perceived by her community, and second, through Joy/Hulga's fall from idealism to disillusionment. Their fall is compared through the behavior of the main characters and their relationships with their societies, and is contrasted by the differences in the stories' plot structures and points-of-view.
"The fall" is the result of friction between the resisting individual and the changing society. In both short stories, Emily and Joy/Hulga are individuals whose morality and ideals are challenged by a society that has conformed to the changes brought about by industrialization. In Emily's case, her resistance to the shifting beliefs and values of her community led to her isolation and made her the center of speculation and intrigue. Joy/Hulga, meanwhile, believed herself to be a worldly individual with no faith in God. However, she encountered her own "fall" in Manley Pointer, whose façade as a devout Christian and Bible salesman led her to expose her vulnerabilities — only to discover that he was more worldly than she was, and that she was not, in fact, as unbelieving and hardened as she had imagined herself to be.
These unfortunate realizations and endings are supported by the behavior of the main characters, both toward themselves and toward their societies. Emily is portrayed as a woman who, because of her lineage and her family's relative influence in the town, considered herself self-reliant, autonomous, and fundamentally different from her community. Her community validated this self-perception through their explicitly expressed animosity toward her — treating her as a subject of speculation and, sometimes, wonder; an individual to be gossiped about and scrutinized. The role she played in her community is best captured at the opening of the story: "[w]hen Miss Emily Grierson died, our whole town went to her funeral: the men through a sort of respectful affection for a fallen monument, the women mostly out of curiosity to see the inside of her house…" (par. 1).
"Joy/Hulga's worldliness exposed by Manley Pointer"
"Contrasting plot structures in Faulkner and O'Connor"
"Third-person vs. first-person POV and its thematic role"
Through the characters, plot structure, and point-of-view, Faulkner and O'Connor successfully communicate to their readers the theme of their heroines' downfall — from high morality and idealism to moral degeneration and disillusionment. These elements of fiction support the dominant theme of both short stories, highlighting points of similarity and difference between the writers' styles and the characters' roles in the overall development of each narrative. Taken together, the two stories offer a compelling portrait of individuals who resist the changing currents of their societies, only to be undone by the very world they sought to hold at arm's length.
You’re 44% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.