This paper examines the contributions of feminist theory to organizational studies, particularly how feminist scholarship on gender and "otherness" has challenged conventional corporate structures. Drawing on Simone de Beauvoir's concept of woman as the "other" and R.W. Connell's analysis of hegemonic masculinity, the paper traces how military-derived hierarchies embedded masculine values into post-WWII business culture. The paper argues that feminist theory has exposed these structures as social constructs rather than natural arrangements, enabling the adoption of policies like affirmative action, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and Equal Employment Opportunity protections. Despite progress, ongoing issues such as pay inequity and sexual harassment demonstrate that feminist perspectives remain essential to organizational theory and practice.
Traditional organizational theory focuses on creating and achieving efficiency through an organizational hierarchy. This approach has resulted in the prevailing model of a faceless bureaucracy, which is defined by its impersonal, role-based, and instrumental characteristics. This paper examines the contributions of feminist theory to organizational theory, focusing on how feminist studies regarding the social constructions of gender and "otherness" have challenged prevailing views of ideal corporate structures.
In her classic work The Second Sex, Simone de Beauvoir explores how women are constantly defined "with reference to men." This means that "woman" has been defined not by her own needs and actions, but always in terms of man's "other." This construction served to deny woman's subjectivity, reducing her to a mere object for men's purposes.
This preferential treatment for "man" is also reflected in the organizational structure of the corporate world. Gender roles have shaped institutional arrangements in ways that privilege masculine traits while marginalizing those associated with women. The traditional business structure that characterizes most Fortune 500 companies was adopted from military hierarchy after World War II. The lack of women in the military and the association with war resulted in a strong masculine culture in the business world.
Leaders in this newly militarized corporate model were equated with military generals, who were traditionally viewed as direct, decisive, and highly individualistic. For decades after the war, scholar R.W. Connell writes that "commercial capitalism calls on a calculative masculinity...Their combination, competitiveness, is institutionalized in 'business' and becomes a central...in the new form of hegemonic masculinity." Women, by contrast, were seen as more adapted to teamwork and supportive behavior. In the militarized hierarchy of business, this translated into women being relegated to supportive roles in administrative and secretarial positions.
This dominant arrangement was presented as "natural," with the assumption that women were unsuited to leadership positions and must therefore fulfill supportive roles. However, an analysis informed by feminist theory reveals how the "hegemonic masculinity" of these corporate structures is actually a social construct. Such constructs gloss over the needs of people who do not conform to these masculine characteristics. Traditionally, this has included women, racial and ethnic minorities, homosexuals, and people with disabilities.
Feminism has contributed significantly to the incorporation of pluralism in organizations and has given voice to the "others" whose needs were previously neglected. This theoretical shift is manifested in many new policies that help to address the imbalances inherent in traditional corporate structures.
For example, affirmative action policies were instituted to counteract historical bias that many organizations harbored against women and minorities. The Americans with Disabilities Act recognizes the special challenges that often act as obstacles for people with disabilities. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission was created to address a myriad of issues ranging from pay equity to sexual harassment. Additional laws such as the Pregnancy Discrimination Act and the Family and Medical Leave Act address many other issues that have kept women—and many men—from participating fully in the labor force.
In conclusion, feminist theories in areas such as the social construction of gender and "otherness" highlight how organizations can incorporate greater pluralism and discontinue practices that discriminate against marginalized groups. Despite these significant gains, however, practices such as pay inequity and sexual harassment continue. Because of these continuing practices, feminist theory still has much to contribute to the study of organizational management.
You’re 95% through this paper. Sign up to read the full paper.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.