This paper examines Fluor Corporation, one of the world's largest publicly owned engineering, procurement, construction, and maintenance firms. It covers the company's corporate strategy, differentiation approach, executive leadership decisions, financial leverage, and market segmentation relative to competitors such as URS Corp, Shaw Group, and Foster Wheeler. The paper also applies Porter's Five Forces framework to assess Fluor's competitive advantage, discusses the company's stance on union relations, and explores its promotion of outsourcing as a strategic service offering. Standard & Poor credit ratings and industry peer comparisons are used to contextualize Fluor's financial and operational standing.
Fluor Corporation is one of the largest publicly owned organizations in the world, operating in the business of engineering, procurement, construction, and maintenance of facilities for manufacturing organizations. Through its subsidiaries, the company has become one of the world's leading businesses, providing high-quality expertise and technical knowledge during all phases of a project. Its strength, as viewed by customers, lies in its ability to deliver optimal solutions that make the best use of customer assets — improving their competitive position and contributing to greater business success. Engineering News-Record magazine has regularly ranked Fluor among the top three design-and-build companies and the top 400 contractors in the world. The organization operates globally and is engaged in many types of work, both in traditional and newly developing industries.
The company is over a hundred years old and operates through numerous subsidiaries. It is recognized as a trusted business leader capable of providing very high-quality expertise and technical knowledge across all phases of a project. Customers rely on Fluor to deliver solutions that use their assets most efficiently, thus strengthening their position in today's highly competitive marketplace. Fluor is also widely regarded as one of the safest contractors in the world, with a commitment to developing, executing, and maintaining construction projects on schedule and within prescribed budgets while delivering excellent quality of work.
Fluor employs more than 30,000 people situated in more than 25 countries across 6 continents. These employees deliver cost-effective, intelligent, and timely solutions. The industries served by Fluor include chemicals and petrochemicals, commercial and institutional projects, national government projects, life sciences, manufacturing, microelectronics, mining, oil and gas, power, telecommunications, and transportation infrastructure. This breadth of experience has given the organization a strong global reputation and made Fluor an important leader in the world marketplace for building contractors.
Fluor's global corporate strategy includes maintaining major engineering subsidiaries in select locations such as Canada, Manila, New Delhi, and Poland. These locations allow Fluor to operate cost-efficiently while accessing highly trained engineers. At the leading edge of procurement operations is its EPC (Engineering, Procurement, and Construction) division, which determines optimal sites for clients and assists in acquiring those sites. Site selection considers not only the feasibility of plant construction but also factors such as government cooperation and the availability of a skilled local workforce.
On the construction side, Fluor has more than 50 construction divisions spread across the globe. These divisions build for projects both domestically and internationally. Because the divisions are distributed worldwide, the company can deploy the division best suited to a particular type of construction while keeping costs low. A notable subsidiary, Fluor Daniel Wright Ltd., specializes in mining, mineral, and metals engineering and serves as a technology center for procurement of specialized materials. The strategy of diversifying into subsidiary companies rather than focusing exclusively on core competencies has proved advantageous, as each organization continues to develop its own strengths, contributing to Fluor's overall competitive advantage.
Another key element of corporate strategy concerns human capital development. Two organizations within the Fluor group address this area: Fluor Signature Services and TRS Staffing Solutions Inc. According to the Fluor website, these organizations help maximize Fluor's investment in people, processes, and technology to deliver high-quality, cost-effective services. TRS Staffing Solutions specializes in the placement of engineering, computer, technical, secretarial, and clerical staff. The company recognizes employee growth and development as a key priority, supported through online training courses and structured development programs designed to match individuals with appropriate opportunities and help them gain valuable experience.
A significant differentiation strategy pursued by Fluor involves growing its business with the U.S. government through selective acquisition. This is evident in the acquisition of Trend Western to support the operations of Del-Jen Inc. (DJI), which Fluor acquired in early 2003. Together, the two organizations are better positioned to respond to federal government interest in consolidating outsourced service providers at military bases. Trend Western, based in Fullerton, California, provides logistics and base operations support to branches of the Department of Defense, including base supply, fuels management, vehicle operations, vehicle maintenance, traffic management, and contingency support — both domestically and internationally. DJI, in turn, offers support in base operations and maintenance, engineering and construction, and education and training.
In an eighteen-month period, Fluor acquired DJI and JA Jones International for government services, as well as P2S for operations and maintenance in the oil, gas, and power industries. The federal government is the single largest purchaser of outsourced services in the world, with a relatively stable annual budget of approximately $200 billion — making government contracting a major growth market for Fluor. Additional government sectors served by Fluor include the Department of Energy, where work continues on accelerated clean-up projects at Hanford and Ferndale; the State Department, where the JA Jones acquisition is expected to expand embassy construction work; and the Department of Homeland Security, where Fluor's expertise in telecommunications, public response, laboratory services, and transportation is expected to be utilized.
"1999 crisis, CEO Phil Carroll's reforms, financial recovery"
New chief executive Phil J. Carroll was brought in from Shell Oil Company. After studying the company, he introduced a series of changes announced at the annual shareholders' meeting in mid-March. The core of the change involved developing new business models for each of Fluor Corporation's Strategic Business Units. Carroll sought leadership expertise from Professor Larry Selden, who conducted workshops with senior executive leadership as an educational foundation. Following these workshops, the leaders developed revised business models for their units and were then responsible for implementing those plans. The financial issues were addressed first, and thereafter assistance was sought from Peter Senge to help create specific business plans for each division. In the final implementation stage, consultants from AT Kearney and McKinsey were engaged.
As a 100-year-old company, Fluor struggled to meet shareholders' expectations for return on capital. According to the chief executive, equity holders expected returns of approximately 11% — consistent with the top quartile of the S&P 500, which reflects revenue growth breakpoints around 12% and profitability breakpoints near 15%. The company's returns had deteriorated to 6.5%, despite operating in capital-intensive businesses such as AT Massey, American Equipment, and TRS. To remedy this, the company pursued operational excellence through identification and measurement of value drivers, which improved the bottom line. The next step was increasing investment in additional profitable sectors, although this approach cuts short-term profitability before generating growth. The company also restructured its asset portfolio, which involved divesting non-performing assets.
The industry review in this section draws on a report by Standard & Poor examining the four largest domestic engineering and construction companies in terms of business and financial risk. As of December 31, 2003, Fluor Corp held a credit rating of A-/A-2. By comparison, URS Corp carried a BB rating, the Shaw Group also had a BB rating, and Foster Wheeler held a CCC- rating — a reflection of its $3.4 billion in outstanding debt. Fluor's strengths were identified as customer diversity, geographic dispersion, exposure to varied end markets, improving risk management techniques, and conservative financial policies. These factors enabled Fluor to maintain an investment-grade credit rating continuously since Standard & Poor began covering the company in 1990.
In contrast, Foster Wheeler experienced a significant decline over the preceding five years, attributed to weak internal controls, acceptance of excessive project risks, substantial cash usage, recurring charges, an over-leveraged balance sheet, and a reduced backlog of orders.
The distribution of pending business among the four major companies highlights Fluor's diversified market presence. Fluor's revenue breakdown was approximately 10% from the government sector, 35% from oil and gas, 32% from industrial and infrastructure, 5% from power, and the remainder from operations and maintenance. By comparison, URS derived more than 60% of its business from the government sector, with minimal exposure to oil and gas or power. Shaw Group and Foster Wheeler showed similarly concentrated distributions. Geographically, Fluor's business was also more broadly distributed than that of its competitors.
Michael Porter's framework for competitive advantage describes how companies can gain an edge over rivals through either cost leadership or product differentiation, and whether that strategy is applied to the whole market or to a specific segment. In the case of Fluor, the company operates across all sections of the contracted construction market — a breadth that is arguably its single strongest competitive point. None of its major competitors are present in every market sector in the same way.
The construction industry is highly competitive, and contract awards are typically based on the cost quoted by the supplier. However, the strategy Fluor employs is more clearly one of differentiation rather than pure cost leadership. The company exploits a distinctive feature of its service offering: the ability to provide a complete, integrated service to clients by acquiring the firms it would otherwise have to collaborate with. This integrated capability is communicated directly to customers — not through broad advertising, but through the detailed service offerings that accompany project quotations. Clients benefit from dealing with a single, comprehensive provider rather than coordinating among multiple suppliers.
"Anti-union hiring practices and outsourcing service model"
You’re 68% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.