This paper examines the four fundamental functions of management — planning, organizing, leading, and controlling — and explains how each contributes to organizational success. Drawing on contemporary management theory and real-world examples including Apple, Flight Centre, and Ponsonby Pies, the paper demonstrates that effective management requires more than industry expertise. It requires a balanced command of strategy formulation, resource allocation, interpersonal leadership, and performance monitoring. The paper argues that these four functions are interdependent, and that managers who develop strength across all four are best positioned to achieve their organization's goals efficiently and effectively.
Management has always been viewed as under the purview of business; however, management is broad in scope and entails the ability to control, lead, plan, and organize within any organizational setting or situation. Management can thus encompass a variety of scenarios, such as managing a department, a baseball team, an itinerary, or one's own finances. The formal definition of management is "the planning, organizing, leading, and controlling of human and other resources to achieve organizational goals efficiently and effectively. An organization's resources include assets such as people and their skills, know-how, and knowledge; machinery; raw materials; computers and information technology; and financial capital" (Jones & George, 2006, p. 5). Without an in-depth knowledge of the four key functions of management, a manager will not be able to perform the duties and responsibilities that come with the role.
The first function of management is the ability to plan. This includes formulating strategies and courses of action based on the vision, mission, and objectives of the organization. Depending on the level of management — entry, mid, or senior — a manager is expected to develop strategic, tactical, or operational plans designed to achieve the organization's identified goals. Upper management sets the overarching goals, and all planning efforts by subordinate managers must align with these. The manager must be able to identify desired results and provide guidance on the key steps that will meet objectives in qualitative terms.
Plans cannot come to fruition without resources. Resources include human, financial, supply, and logistical elements. The planning function of management is therefore a critical endeavor, providing the strategic, tactical, and operational blueprint for how things are to be done and how goals are to be achieved.
Once an approved and budgeted plan is in place, the manager's next task is to organize the requisite resources to implement it. Through organization, managers establish a structure of working relationships that allows people to interact and collaborate in pursuit of organizational goals. Organizing requires grouping people into departments according to the kinds of job-specific tasks they perform (Jones & George, 2006, p. 12). Without a proper organizational setup, plans will almost certainly fail and resources will be needlessly wasted.
It is the manager's responsibility to organize people and resources so that objectives are met with minimal disruption and no wasted effort. In the early days of Apple Computers, for example, CEO John Sculley and Chairman Steve Jobs were competing so fiercely for control of the company that "neither of them had the time or energy to ensure that Apple's resources were being used efficiently" (Jones & George, 2006, p. 4). Jobs played favorites, pitted teams against one another, and failed to develop a research budget, resulting in tremendous waste. Organizing also means ensuring that the sequence of events and activities is properly implemented so that there will be no overlap or unnecessary disruption in the work schedule. Without the organizational skills that Jobs later developed and brought back to Apple, the teams of the company's early days worked at cross purposes, losing sight of Apple's overarching goals.
"Leadership skills and the Flight Centre case study"
"Control function illustrated with mortgage lender example"
The four management functions discussed in this paper are complementary and interdependent. An effective manager is able to balance them in order to achieve the objectives of the organization. As the brief case study of Ponsonby Pies illustrates, different managers bring different strengths to the table. At Ponsonby, manager Katrina Cole is the strategist, with the ability to see the big picture and formulate plans. Co-manager Anthony Cole has been able to effectively implement Katrina's strategies on the factory floor (Twiname, 1999, p. 525, cited in McShane & Travaglione). Together, they provide strong management for a small company that has enjoyed tremendous success, even when competitors predicted it would not survive.
You’re 59% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.