Advertising's Future and Its Impact on IMC Programs
This paper examines the systemic transformation of advertising and Integrated Marketing Communications (IMC) strategies driven by digital technologies, social media, and advanced analytics. It traces how the rise of Big Data, behavioral analytics, and consumer-generated content is redefining how marketers identify, segment, and engage audiences. Drawing on the persona-based strategies of Walmart and the mass-customization IMC framework of Nike's NikeID product line, the paper illustrates best practices in audience targeting, campaign measurement, and multi-channel coordination. It also addresses how the Internet has restructured the economics of advertising, elevated the importance of search engine optimization, and enabled precise measurement of each promotional channel's contribution to the buying process.
- Introduction: The Changing Landscape of Marketing and Advertising: Digital disruption challenges traditional 4Ps marketing frameworks
- Assessing Current Trends and the Future of Advertising: Personas, social media, and analytics reshape advertising trends
- Impact of the Internet on Advertising: Internet restructures advertising economics and measurement
- Measuring IMC Strategies' Effectiveness: KPIs and dashboards track multi-channel IMC performance
- Nike's IMC Framework and Excellence of Execution: Nike NikeID mass customization drives integrated IMC strategy
- Conclusion: Analytics and co-creation define future IMC success
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Grounds abstract marketing theory in concrete corporate examples — Walmart's persona segmentation and Nike's NikeID launch — giving each argument a real-world anchor that makes the analysis credible and specific.
- Moves logically from macro trends (digital disruption, social media, analytics) down to tactical measurement tools (Marketo Program Analyzer, KPI dashboards), demonstrating both strategic and operational depth.
- Integrates a wide range of peer-reviewed sources alongside corporate investor relations documents, showing the student can synthesize academic literature with primary business data.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates applied framework analysis: it introduces established models (the 4Ps, Web 2.0 design objectives, BCG portfolio matrix) and then tests them against actual company behavior, rather than simply describing the models in the abstract. This technique — using conceptual frameworks as lenses rather than as endpoints — is a hallmark of graduate-level marketing analysis.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a broad framing of marketing disruption, then narrows progressively: from industry-wide advertising trends, to the Internet's specific economic and strategic effects, to measurement methodology, and finally to a detailed single-brand case study (Nike). This funnel structure — wide context, focused mechanisms, concrete application — keeps the argument coherent across multiple analytical layers and is well-suited to applied business writing.
Introduction: The Changing Landscape of Marketing and Advertising
The traditional strategies marketers use to attract, sell, and serve prospective customers — and to retain existing ones — are undergoing a systemic, fundamental change. The long-held beliefs centered on product, pricing, promotional strategies, and place or distribution (the 4Ps of marketing) are being challenged by the mercurial nature of today's customers and the speed with which their preferences are shifting.
No longer can a product or service be marketed purely on the basis of its functional value, or worse, its features and purely physical attributes. Customers expect excellent experiences from products, augmented by personalization to their individual tastes and preferences (Ramaswamy, 2008). Marketing services is as much about defining realistic, high expectations as it is about aligning every customer-centered process to delivering a consistently excellent experience. Social media channels are making the task of communicating the experiences customers can expect much easier to accomplish, especially given the rapid adoption of consumer-generated content (CGM) (Bernoff & Li, 2008). Customer referenceability and referential systems that provide prospective customers with insights into the experiences of others are also more widely used than ever before.
Social media is making the tasks of marketers engaged in Integrated Marketing Communications (IMC) more challenging, as each component of an integrated strategy must align with specific audiences' interests within a timeframe that is relevant to them (Gonring, 1994).
One of the most valuable lessons learned by marketers using IMC strategies today is how the perception of their products and services — from the basic value delivered to the affiliative and aspirational aspects of their brands — varies so significantly across audiences and market segments (Tsai, 2005). The increasing reliance on digitally based marketing and selling strategies has given marketers greater insights into these variations by audience and broader segment (LaPointe, 2012). Advertising is going through a revolutionary change today, driven by the insights gained from behavioral and predictive analytics. The emergence of Big Data as an area of marketing analytics and predictive modeling will accelerate over the coming years as marketers seek even greater insights into how prospective and current customers make purchasing decisions and choose which brands to remain loyal to. Combining analytics and Big Data is also giving marketers the ability to define psychographic profiles of their customers — a strategy Walmart uses extensively (Walmart Investor Relations, 2012).
Advertising in general, and IMC strategies specifically, are going through a series of disruptive innovations brought on by the steadily dropping costs of digital marketing channels, the ready availability of advanced analytics, and the rapidly changing nature of customer preferences (Rosenbloom, 2007). This paper evaluates the key issues facing advertising today, assesses the future of advertising, and examines the impact of technological change on advertising strategies. An assessment of how best to measure IMC programs and strategies — along with an analysis of a successful IMC program at Nike — is also provided.
References
Acker, O., Grone, F., Blockus, A., & Bange, C. (2011). In-memory analytics: Strategies for real-time CRM. Journal of Database Marketing & Customer Strategy Management, 18(2), 129–136.
Anantachart, S. (2004). Integrated marketing communications and market planning: Their implications to brand equity building. Journal of Promotion Management, 11(1), 101–125.
Beltran-Royo, C., Zhang, H., Blanco, L. A., & Almagro, J. (2013). Multistage multiproduct advertising budgeting. European Journal of Operational Research, 225(1), 179.
Bernoff, J., & Li, C. (2008). Harnessing the power of the oh-so-social web. MIT Sloan Management Review, 49(3), 36–42.
Broekhuizen, T. L. J., & Alsem, K. J. (2002). Success factors for mass customization: A conceptual model. Journal of Market-Focused Management, 5(4), 309–330.
Burton, S., & Soboleva, A. (2011). Interactive or reactive? Marketing with Twitter. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 28(7), 491–499.
Doorey, D. (2011). The transparent supply chain: From resistance to implementation at Nike and Levi-Strauss. Journal of Business Ethics, 103(4), 587–603.
Gonring, M. P. (1994). Putting integrated marketing communications to work today. Public Relations Quarterly, 39(3), 45.
Hair, J. F., Jr. (2007). Knowledge creation in marketing: The role of predictive analytics. European Business Review, 19(4), 303–315.
Hauser, W. J. (2007). Marketing analytics: The evolution of marketing research in the twenty-first century. Direct Marketing, 1(1), 38–54.
Herskovitz, S., & Malcolm, C. (2010). The essential brand persona: Storytelling and branding. Journal of Business Strategy, 31(3), 21–28.
Huang, J., Su, S., Zhou, L., & Liu, X. (2013). Attitude toward the viral ad: Expanding traditional advertising models to interactive advertising. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 27(1), 36.
Keller, E., & Fay, B. (2012). Word-of-mouth advocacy: A new key to advertising effectiveness. Journal of Advertising Research, 52(4), 459.
LaPointe, P. (2012). The dog ate my analysis: The hitchhiker's guide to marketing analytics. Journal of Advertising Research, 52(4), 395.
Nike Investor Relations. (2012). Investor relations. Retrieved December 29, 2012, from
O'Reilly, T. (2006, July). Web 2.0: Stuck on a name or hooked on value? Dr. Dobb's Journal, 31(7), 10.
Ramaswamy, V. (2008). Co-creating value through customers' experiences: The Nike case. Strategy & Leadership, 36(5), 9–14.
Rosenbloom, B. (2007). Multi-channel strategy in business-to-business markets: Prospects and problems. Industrial Marketing Management, 36(1), 4.
Selcuk, B., & Ozluk, O. (2013). Optimal keyword bidding in search-based advertising with target exposure levels. European Journal of Operational Research, 226(1), 163.
Stonehouse, G., & Minocha, S. (2008). Strategic processes @ Nike: Making and doing knowledge management. Knowledge and Process Management, 15(1), 24.
Tsai, S. (2005). Integrated marketing as management of holistic consumer experience. Business Horizons, 48(5), 431–441.
Walmart Investor Relations. (2012). Investor relations. Retrieved December 29, 2012, from
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.