This paper provides a biographical and theological overview of Gerrit Cornelis Berkouwer (1903–1996), the influential Dutch Reformed theologian who taught dogmatics at the Free University of Amsterdam for over three decades. It traces his early career, his controversial role in the 1944 church split known as the Liberation (Vrijmaking), and his subsequent shift toward ecumenical engagement. The paper examines the core tenets of his theology — including sola fide, sola scriptura, and the correlation between faith and its object — as expressed in his fourteen-volume Studies in Dogmatics. It also considers his critical yet fair assessments of Karl Barth and Roman Catholicism, and his legacy as one of the most significant evangelical theologians of the twentieth century.
Gerrit Cornelis Berkouwer was born in 1903 in Amsterdam and was a Dutch Reformed theologian. He grew up in a devoutly practiced Reformed Christian home and completed his theological training at the Free University of Amsterdam, receiving his PhD in 1932. He held pastorates in the province of Friesland and then in Amsterdam itself before beginning to teach at the Free University in 1940. In 1945 he was appointed to the Chair of Dogmatics, a position he held until his retirement in 1973 (Elwell 151).
It was during this early period of his career at the Free University that he concurrently became involved in the Gereformeerde Kerken in Nederland (GKN) and held the position of president of the general synod of the GKN from 1943 to 1945. In that position he became a leader in a movement against one school of Reformist thought and one particular theologian, Dr. Klaas Schilder — a conflict that ended in a rift between various factions of the Reformed Church. The decisions of the General Synod of the GKN in fact occasioned the church split of 1944 known as the Liberation (Vrijmaking) (Vanderheide 16).
This controversial situation was one Berkouwer later regarded as problematic, and he contended that such actions should have ended in reconciliation rather than separation. This view is attested to by his later involvement in ecumenical ministries and his role in bringing the Dutch Reformed Church into ecumenical standing with other Christian groups. As Vanderheide writes in Berkouwer's memorial:
"Past president of the synod of the Gereformeerde Kerken in Nederland and one of the most influential theologians in modern Dutch Reformed history, passed away on January 25 [1996] at the age of 92. Berkouwer played a key role in the events that led to the 1944 deposition of Dr. Klaas Schilder and subsequent split in the GKN. Initially regarded as a leading conservative, Berkouwer gained increasing prominence in ecumenical circles and became an advocate and defender of more progressive positions in the GKN." (Vanderheide 16)
Berkouwer stressed through not only his words and writings but also his actions that dogmatic and theological debate and difference should not constitute the development of rivalries or the termination of associations. Rather, such matters should be handled academically and with the goal of reconciliation and understanding.
Berkouwer was a well-liked and influential member of the Reformed Church, and his writings and actions left a legacy that extended far beyond his years. In his many years as a theologian he encountered many influential — and not so influential — people, and regardless of their personal regard for him, most considered him "captivating, well-read, influential and cosmopolitan" (Vanderheide 16).
Almost everybody agrees as well that Berkouwer's thinking underwent a shift. Observers committed to Reformed orthodoxy indicate that, especially during the 1950s, Berkouwer departed from the classic Reformed viewpoint on several issues. For example, a comparison between his earlier and later writings shows a change in viewpoint regarding matters such as the authority of Scripture and original sin (Vanderheide 16).
Berkouwer was a prolific writer and theologian who worked through a lifetime of theological endeavors, ultimately producing one of the most formative bodies of work in the Reformist movement. Even at the age of 86 he was still producing and publishing works that developed his theology. His largest work, published at that age, takes on a memoir-like quality, involving realistic portrayals of many theological debates — some of which included Berkouwer himself as a main character. Zoeken en vinden (Seeking and Finding) has yet to be published and translated into English, as have many of Berkouwer's other works. "In that volume Berkouwer narrated a number of memories and experiences from more than seventy years of theological endeavor. The professor of dogmatics was himself one of the main characters in this book" (Vanderheide 16).
Within this work Berkouwer also discussed the Liberation of the Reformed Churches in the Netherlands, which ran concurrent with World War II. It is here that he somewhat belatedly explains his resolution regarding his involvement in the split, reflecting that the synod meeting of the GKN during this period "backed those opposed to the synodical decisions into a corner. Looking back across the distance of several decades, Berkouwer felt that the synod at which he himself presided should have done things differently" (Vanderheide 16).
As a theological instructor, Berkouwer engendered a love of theology within his students, and the legacies of those students are fundamental to his own legacy. Many of his former students, having earned high honors and degrees in theology, stepped forward in the twenty-first century to become significant participants and leaders in theological endeavors. "A total of forty-two students obtained their doctorates under his sponsorship and guidance. From this group, several became teachers of theology themselves" (Vanderheide 16).
Berkouwer was born in the Hague and raised in Zaandam, but his fame spread around the world by means of his many publications. In 1932 he obtained his doctorate from the Free University with a dissertation entitled Geloof en Openbaring in de nieuwe Duitse theologie (Faith and Revelation in Recent German Theology). Among his other works he wrote Karl Barth (1936), Het probleem der Schriftkritiek (The Problem of Scripture Criticism, 1936), Wereldoorlog en theologie (World War and Theology, 1945), Conflict met Rome (Conflict with Rome, 1948), De triomf der genade in de theologie van Karl Barth (The Triumph of Grace in the Theology of Karl Barth, 1954), and Vaticaans Concilie en de nieuwe theologie (The Second Vatican Council and Recent Theology). In 1949 the first volume of his eighteen-volume Studies in Dogmatics appeared in the Netherlands. A large number of his books were translated into English and published in North America, and in 1962 he served as an observer at the Second Vatican Council in Rome (Vanderheide 16).
Berkouwer is perhaps best known for his modern stress on ecumenicism. As early as 1957 he was appointed by the GKN to attend assemblies of the International Council of Christian Churches (meeting in Amsterdam) and the World Council of Churches (meeting in New Delhi). Berkouwer's report to the GKN resulted in his suggestion that the organization join the World Council of Churches — one of the first ecumenical bodies of the Christian faith. The GKN followed Berkouwer's advice and became one of the first evangelical denominations to represent itself among the body of mainstream ecumenical ministries.
The Vrijmaking of 1944 cast a long shadow over Berkouwer's life and career. His role as president of the GKN's general synod during the period that led to the deposition of Dr. Klaas Schilder was one he later revisited with considerable candor. In his memoir-like final work, Zoeken en vinden, he acknowledged that the synod should have sought reconciliation rather than enforcing the decisions that drove a portion of the Reformed community into separation.
This public acknowledgment of institutional overreach is significant precisely because it came from one of the key decision-makers of the time. It demonstrates the personal transformation that underlay Berkouwer's subsequent advocacy for ecumenical dialogue, and it reveals a theologian willing to subject his own past actions to the same critical scrutiny he applied to scripture and tradition. His later career — defined by bridge-building rather than boundary-drawing — can be read in large part as a sustained response to the lessons of 1944.
Berkouwer is said to have been influenced by the theologians Herman Bavinck and Abraham Kuyper and what Elwell describes as their "presuppositional theological stance" (151). This went against the liberalism of Berkouwer's day, which he believed had become anthropocentric (human-centered), and against neo-orthodoxy, "which had separated God from the world" (151). Berkouwer stressed instead that theology and therefore human action should be sola fide (by faith alone) and sola scriptura (based on scripture as the only source). To some degree this is a basic tenet of evangelical Christianity, but Berkouwer went further to stress that Christian faith should be built upon the idea of the Reformation as rejecting not only negative biblical criticism but "any view that gave normative status to any human act, even the act of faith itself" (151). According to Berkouwer, "Scripture alone must be our norm, and faith is always a response of the human being to God, who calls out through the Holy Spirit" (151).
These challenges to other Reformation movements — as well as what he and others judged to be the humanization of faith — form the central arguments and tenets of Berkouwer's fourteen-volume Studies in Dogmatics, written and published between 1952 and 1976, encompassing the entire span of his active theological teaching career. According to Elwell, this group of fourteen works, all of which have been translated into many languages including English, forms "the most monumental evangelical theological project of this century" (151). Elwell describes the volumes as "written in an almost conversational style" dealing "with topics of theological concern, such as divine election, faith and sanctification, Holy Scripture, and the church, rather than presenting a tightly argued system of thought" (151). Despite Berkouwer's shift in his views on human relations and his later regret over fostering intolerance, Berkouwer "never wavered from his commitment to the principles of Scripture, faith and grace alone" (Elwell 151).
A central feature of Berkouwer's theological method is his insistence on the inseparability of Scripture and personal faith. As the Reverend Dr. Charles Cameron notes, drawing on L.B. Smedes's description of Berkouwer's approach:
"The truth of the Gospel… is known and understood only within the total context of both revelation and the obedience of faith. Theology, whose task is to restate that truth, is determined in its methods and limited in its conclusions by the nature of the Gospel as it is heard and obeyed in faith." (Cameron, "The Theology of Berkouwer")
When Berkouwer opens his Studies in Dogmatics volume entitled Holy Scripture, he demands accounting for the idea that Holy Scripture can be discussed and conceived of apart from its relationship to the individual's personal belief in it, arguing that such attempts at objectivity are futile since the two cannot be separated from one another. He holds that a misguided fear of subjectivism lapses into a false objectivism, with the suggestion that Christian truth can be considered without direct reference to the believer's personal involvement with that truth. He emphasizes the importance of having a proper understanding of the relationship between faith and its object: "faith is decisively determined by the object of faith, namely, God and His Word." He also insists that this "does not… imply that Scripture… derives its authority from the believer's faith," since "this idea is already rendered untenable by the very nature of faith, which rests on and trusts in the Word of God" (Holy Scripture, p. 10). Using the word "relativity" to describe the correlation between faith and its object, Berkouwer distances himself from any suggestion of "philosophical relativism," clarifying that his use of the idea "refers simply to the relation of a thing to something other than itself" (Faith and Justification, p. 9). Our theology is to be "relative to the Word of God," meaning that we must be "occupied in continuous and obedient listening to the Word" (Faith and Justification, p. 9) (Cameron, "The Theology of Berkouwer").
The following passage from Berkouwer's own writings illustrates how central the concept of freedom — properly understood — is to his theology:
"We must then speak without any hesitation of human freedom as a creaturely freedom given by God. No misuse of the desire for freedom, not even complete anarchy, should tempt us to stop speaking boldly and emphatically of freedom. The anxiety regarding the use of the term which we find in Christian circles is indeed historically and psychologically understandable, since life has often been shaken to its foundations through an appeal to 'freedom.' Freedom is often understood as autonomy and arbitrary power, as a purely formal power of man to go his own way. Thus man can be 'liberated' from many restrictions, and thus Cain can 'free' himself from Abel — 'Am I my brother's keeper?' — and thus freedom can become an idol, a myth, which fills the heart and passions of man." (Berkouwer, "Human Freedom")
"Critical and ecumenical responses to Barth and Vatican II"
"Origins and structure of the fourteen-volume series"
"Berkouwer's legacy in global ecumenical theology"
You’re 56% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.