Gender and Patriarchy in Mary Shelley's Frankenstein
This paper examines Mary Shelley's Frankenstein as a sustained critique of the patriarchal culture dominant in early nineteenth-century England. Drawing on Bakhtin's theory of the novel as a site of competing voices, the paper argues that the novel's seemingly contradictory themes — domesticity, forbidden emotion, fear of pregnancy, and the suppression of femininity — are unified by a single contextual framework: the male-dominated social order of Shelley's era. The analysis explores how Shelley uses Victor Frankenstein's act of creation to allegorize pregnancy and post-partum depression, challenges rigid gender binaries, and advocates for a culture that values feminine qualities of empathy and care alongside masculine rationality. References to Margaret Mead's anthropological findings and feminist literary criticism support the paper's central claim that Shelley was arguing for a more balanced role for the feminine principle in both society and individual personality.
- Introduction: Bakhtin, the Novel, and Frankenstein's Contested Themes: Thesis: patriarchal framework unifies Frankenstein's conflicting themes
- Patriarchal Culture in Early Nineteenth-Century England: Historical roots of male-dominated culture Shelley inhabited
- The Idealized Domestic Woman and Bourgeois Family Values: Shelley's female characters reflect and critique domestic ideology
- Fear of Pregnancy, Childbirth, and the Gothic as Vehicle: Gothic form lets Shelley voice suppressed maternal fears
- Victor's Creation as Allegory for Maternal Experience: Victor's labor mirrors pregnancy, post-partum depression
- Gender Imbalance, the Enlightenment, and the Monster's Wickedness: Monster's evil exposes blindness of hyper-rational masculinity
- The Feminine Principle and the Call for Gender Balance: Shelley and Mead both argue for balanced gender qualities
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- It establishes a clear, unified interpretive framework — the critique of patriarchal culture — and consistently applies it to explain Frankenstein's diverse and apparently contradictory themes.
- It integrates biographical context (Shelley's own experiences of pregnancy and infant loss) with close textual analysis of specific passages, grounding abstract claims in concrete evidence.
- It draws on a range of scholarly voices, from feminist literary critics to anthropologist Margaret Mead, to broaden the paper's argument beyond literary analysis into cultural and social critique.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper exemplifies contextual literary criticism: rather than treating the novel's themes in isolation, it situates them within a historically specific social framework. By anchoring each interpretive claim to primary text quotations and secondary scholarly sources, the author models how to move from close reading to broader cultural argument without overgeneralizing.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a theoretical frame (Bakhtin) and states its central hypothesis in the introduction. It then builds its argument in logical stages: establishing the historical reality of patriarchal culture, analyzing Shelley's depiction of domesticity, exploring the Gothic novel as a vehicle for suppressed emotion, performing close readings of Victor's creation as pregnancy allegory, and finally widening the lens to connect Shelley's critique to Margaret Mead's anthropological work. The conclusion returns to the paper's opening hypothesis to confirm it has been substantiated.
Introduction: Bakhtin, the Novel, and Frankenstein's Contested Themes
Mikhail Bakhtin distinguished the literary form of the novel as distinct from other genres because of its rendering of the dynamic present — not in a separate and unitary literary language, but in the competing and often cosmic discord of actual and multiple voices — thus making contact with contemporary reality in all its open-endedness (Bender et al., p. x). Bakhtin's definition of the novel is important because it serves to illuminate the reason why Mary Shelley's Frankenstein has come to be regarded as connecting important, but widely disparate, elements of nineteenth-century culture in Victorian England (Fisch et al., p. 186).
With many apparently conflicting themes — such as the domestic ideology of the bourgeois family and parenting on the one hand, and the fear of pregnancy, childbirth, and forbidden emotions ranging from the desire to play God to incest on the other — Shelley's Frankenstein is often seen as a complex mosaic that lends itself to varying interpretations. A closer look at the pieces within the mosaic, however, reveals a common thread that questions the prevailing assumptions of gender roles in culture. One possible resolution to the seemingly conflicting themes in Shelley's work, therefore, lies in analyzing the disparate, often contradictory elements from a single contextual framework: the male-dominated, patriarchal culture in existence during the time. Given this hypothesis, the objective of this paper is to explore whether the adoption of such a contextual framework will help to clarify the divisions in Shelley's work between conformist and challenging views of gender-balanced roles both in society and within the make-up of the individual personality.
Patriarchal Culture in Early Nineteenth-Century England
The existence of a patriarchal culture during Mary Shelley's lifetime has been well established in a wide body of work in the fields of sociology, cultural studies, and literature. The study of such works helps us understand the historical antecedents of a patriarchal culture and the forces in operation during the time Shelley was writing Frankenstein. Masculinity and femininity had, over generations, been defined and shaped by men through the medium of patriarchal culture. Furthermore, the beginning of the nineteenth century and the Industrial Revolution accelerated the masculinization of culture due to the exponential increase in the production of knowledge by men and the multiplication of cultural codes and languages written in a male script (Aker & Morrow, p. 25).
Though the nineteenth century was actually a period of great progress in basic human rights — the seeds of which were sown in the late eighteenth century — it still remained a patriarchal culture: "Paine's stress on individual rights...drew on the classical tradition of Locke.... But Locke's concept of the individual agent never extended beyond men...further reinforced the differences between men and women by arguing that within the family men would inevitably carry greater authority." (Shiach, p. 187)
Works Cited
Aker, D.L. & Morrow, F. Unleashing Our Unknown Selves: An Inquiry into the Future of Femininity and Masculinity. New York: Praeger Publishers, 1991.
Bender, J., David, D., Richetti, J.J., & Seidel, M. The Columbia History of the British Novel. New York: Columbia University Press, 1994.
Caine, B. English Feminism, 1780–1980. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.
Fisch, A., Mellor, A.K., & Schor, E.H. The Other Mary Shelley: Beyond Frankenstein. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.
Hobbs, C. "Reading the Symptoms: An Exploration of Repression and Hysteria in Mary Shelley's Frankenstein." Studies in the Novel. 1993. Vol. 25: 2, p. 152+.
Shelley, M. Frankenstein: Or, the Modern Prometheus. New York: Collier Books, 1961.
Shiach, M. Feminism and Cultural Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.