This paper examines the ways in which geographical features influence a nation's development across multiple dimensions. Drawing on Japan and Portugal as comparative examples, the paper explores how natural resource availability shapes economic strength, how a country's spatial location affects its geopolitics and military posture, and how terrain and physical barriers influence trade and economic systems. The paper also considers cultural geography — including language, religion, art, and the effects of globalization — and briefly introduces additional geographical subfields such as health geography, tourism geography, and population geography as further lenses for understanding national development.
The paper demonstrates comparative analysis as a core academic technique. By selecting two nations — Japan (resource-poor, geographically isolated) and Portugal (resource-rich, continental boundary nation) — the author creates a natural contrast that makes abstract claims about geography's influence more persuasive and easier to evaluate.
The paper opens with a thesis statement, then develops five distinct geographic dimensions: natural resources, spatial location, economic terrain, cultural geography, and a brief survey of additional geographic subfields (health, tourism, population). Each section introduces a concept, explains its significance to national development, and where appropriate ties it back to the Japan–Portugal comparison. The conclusion gestures toward further areas of inquiry rather than summarizing, giving the paper an open, exploratory tone appropriate to an introductory-level piece.
The existence of geographical features profoundly influences a nation's development. One such feature is the presence or absence of natural resources. Natural resources are typically defined as land or raw materials that occur naturally within environments that exist relatively undisturbed by human activity. Consider how their presence or absence affects Japan and Portugal differently.
Japan has very few mineral natural resources; as a result, it is the world's largest importer of coal and liquefied natural gas, as well as the second largest importer of oil. Japan does, however, have an abundance of fish. Portugal, by contrast, possesses a long list of natural resources: fish, cork forests, iron ore, copper, zinc, tin, tungsten, silver, gold, uranium, marble, clay, gypsum, salt, arable land, and hydropower.
A country's natural resources can make or break its economy. The quantity and variety of a country's natural resources influence the health of its economy, the quality of life of its citizens, and broader indicators of national well-being. Countries with extensive natural resources tend to be among the more highly developed, industrialized, or wealthy nations.
Another aspect of geography that shapes national development is a country's spatial location relative to other nations. Whether a country is geographically isolated — like the island of Japan — or whether it shares a boundary with a friendly, neutral, or hostile neighbor has a significant effect on its geopolitics. A country's location determines how easily it can be attacked or defended, which carries profound political implications, as does its capacity to project military force outward.
Geography influences the composition of a country's military forces and the types of weaponry it prioritizes. It also shapes boundaries, nation-state formation, international organizations, diplomacy, internal political divisions, and even voting patterns. In short, where a country sits on the map is inseparable from how it exercises and experiences power.
You’re 48% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.