Monologue and Madness in Gilman and Poe: A Comparison
This essay compares the use of first-person monologue in Charlotte Perkins Gilman's "The Yellow Wallpaper" and Edgar Allan Poe's "The Cask of Amontillado." Both stories rely on a single narrator whose perspective shapes all events, yet the trajectories of the two narrators move in opposite directions. Poe's narrator begins in a state of disordered passion and grows increasingly methodical and focused as he descends into the catacombs to exact his revenge. Gilman's narrator begins with relative sanity and unravels into full madness by the story's end. The essay also identifies a shared structural motif — literal versus figurative descent — as a point of meaningful comparison between the two works.
- Introduction: Two Monologues, Two Directions: Thesis contrasting Gilman's and Poe's narrator arcs
- Poe's Narrator: From Passion to Method: Poe's narrator grows calmer and more calculated
- Gilman's Narrator: The Descent into Madness: Gilman's narrator unravels through obsession with wallpaper
- Parallel Descents in Structure and Symbol: Both stories share a literal and figurative descent motif
- Conclusion: Opposing Arcs of the Narrative Voice: Synthesis of opposite narrative trajectories in both works
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The essay establishes a clear comparative thesis early: the two narrators travel opposite emotional arcs, with Poe's becoming more controlled and Gilman's becoming more unhinged, making the argument easy to follow and test against the evidence.
- Direct quotations from both primary texts are used purposefully — each cited passage is immediately analyzed for what it reveals about the narrator's mental state, rather than left to speak for itself.
- The identification of a shared structural motif (descent — one literal, one figurative) elevates the essay beyond surface-level contrast and shows genuine analytical thinking.
Key academic technique demonstrated
Comparative close reading: the essay selects a specific narrative device (first-person monologue) and tracks how it functions differently across two texts, using textual evidence to support each claim. This technique demonstrates how the same formal tool can produce opposite thematic effects depending on the author's purpose.
Structure breakdown
The essay opens with a comparative introduction and a clear thesis. The second paragraph analyzes Poe's narrator, focusing on the opening emotional excess and its gradual cooling. The third paragraph turns to Gilman's narrator, charting the opposite arc from sanity to delusion. The fourth paragraph identifies descent as a structural parallel linking both texts. A brief conclusion synthesizes the findings. The Works Cited page follows MLA web-source format.
Introduction: Two Monologues, Two Directions
Both Charlotte Perkins Gilman's The Yellow Wallpaper and Edgar Allan Poe's The Cask of Amontillado involve extensive use of monologue. Each tale is narrated by a single person whose viewpoints and opinions are delivered directly to the reader, coloring the events of the plot accordingly. However, there are critical distinctions between these two tales and between the monologues their narrators employ. Gilman's story is narrated by a woman whose mental health slowly and inexorably unravels — to her detriment, and that of those who purport to care for her. Poe's story is narrated by a man bent on exacting revenge upon another. Thus, despite the fact that both short stories utilize monologue, the principal difference between them is that the monologue of Gilman's narrator spirals at its conclusion to illustrate her mental illness, whereas the monologue of Poe's narrator becomes more focused and driven at its conclusion as he grows fixated on taking his revenge.
Works Cited
Poe, Edgar Allan. The Cask of Amontillado. University of Virginia, 1846. Web.
Gilman, Charlotte Perkins. The Yellow Wallpaper. Project Gutenberg, 2008. Web.
Gilman, Charlotte Perkins. "Why I Wrote The Yellow Wallpaper." 2008. Web.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.