This paper examines the relationship between geographic information systems (GIS) and emergency management decision-making through the lens of the Incident Command System (ICS). Drawing on principles from emergency operations and firefighting literature, it argues that GIS enables Incident Commanders to maintain a wider span of control by supplying detailed terrain data, real-time mapping, and rapid data dissemination. The paper also addresses how flexible decision-making styles align with GIS capabilities at both small and large-scale incidents, and identifies the planning and logistics functions as primary beneficiaries of GIS integration in emergency operations centers.
The paper applies analytical synthesis by taking principles from emergency management literature (ICS structure, span of control) and integrating them with a technology assessment. Rather than describing GIS features in isolation, the author consistently frames each capability in terms of its operational impact on command authority and team effectiveness — a technique that strengthens argumentative coherence across all four response sections.
The paper is organized around four distinct prompts, each functioning as a mini-essay. The first section establishes the conceptual foundation (decision-making and span of control). The second builds the central argument that GIS expands the IC's effective span of control. The third catalogs specific GIS benefits for the IC and Emergency Operations Center. The final section addresses decision-making style compatibility with GIS, concluding with an argument for flexible, modular command approaches. Citations are woven throughout to anchor claims.
Decision-making affects span of control directly during a disaster or emergency. How effective decision-making is depends on the ability of the decision maker to adequately assess a threat and determine what forces or equipment must be utilized to moderate or neutralize the threat before significant damage can occur (Smith, 1997). A decision maker is more likely to maintain control during a disaster or emergency if his or her team of subordinates is well trained and well motivated. Such a team is more likely to respond in a positive and efficient manner when under the direction of a commander.
The decision maker must adjust the level of control necessary during a disaster or emergency based on the severity of the emergency and the likelihood that widespread disaster will result. The decision maker must also assess the size and skill level of his or her team when deciding on the level of control to maintain. Flexibility of style is critical in relation to the amount of control exercised in an emergent situation. The level of risk involved in taking action must also be analyzed so that the decision maker may account for the "realities of manpower availability" (Smith, 1997).
The initial recognition and identification of the scope of an emergency lie within the hands of the decision maker. Based on his or her assessment of this risk, adequate control over the situation may be obtained. The decision maker may choose to maintain control using a very authoritative and directive approach if the team is less well trained or very small. Alternatively, the decision maker may opt to delegate a great deal of control and responsibility while still maintaining oversight over the disaster, particularly if the team is large and well trained. The level of control will ultimately depend upon the training, size, and motivation of the team, as well as the nature and scope of the disaster at hand.
The use of a geographic information system (GIS) would enable the Incident Commander to maintain a wider span of control during any type of disaster or emergency. The use of GIS will also enable the IC to operate more effectively and knowledgeably, and may allow the IC to manage a larger team over a wider area based on the information the system provides. GIS is capable of supplying the IC with detailed information that may not otherwise be available regarding the nature and scope of the terrain and the disaster or emergency being addressed. Once the IC has this detailed information, he or she will likely disseminate it to subordinates and delegate control accordingly, enabling action across a larger affected area and management of a larger response team. In short, having GIS provide more information enables the IC to loosen the span of control appropriately.
The title of Incident Commander carries with it the expectation that the IC will be responsible for directing, ordering, and controlling resources and personnel during an emergency (Hall, 1998). The IC is responsible for all activities and incidents, including "the development and implementation of a strategic plan" (Hall, 1998). The IC is expected to make a number of critical decisions, call upon resources, and delegate authority to subordinates to ensure an emergency is handled appropriately. Use of GIS will enable the IC to acquire more information about an incident and thus direct subordinates in a more efficient and effective manner. With GIS, there exists one fewer unknown in the process of emergency and disaster management.
Use of GIS is most likely to be beneficial to the planning and logistics teams. The planning team can use information provided by the IC and GIS to track resources and monitor the status of personnel and equipment deployed to alleviate a disaster. Logistics can operate more efficiently by supporting the IC with supplies, ground support, communications, and other essential services (Hall, 1998).
GIS can assist the IC in many ways. The primary benefit includes increased knowledge and mapping of surrounding terrain and emergency hazards, as well as efficient communication and storage of that data. GIS provides the IC with better maps and thus better geographic information to support more informed decisions. Commanders no longer need to make assumptions regarding geographic information when aided by such technology. GIS can also store data regarding previous emergencies or studies of a particular area, and this information can be disseminated to teams within minutes, allowing for more rapid decision-making and better assessment of potential outcomes.
The primary use of computer-based mapping such as GIS is to establish a clearer understanding of a geographic location. GIS assists the IC by gathering information related to the terrain in which a disaster is occurring and converting that information into a visual tool that enables planners and team leads to better understand geographic considerations such as road conditions, construction, area dimensions, and natural features present in the landscape (Harrington, 2003). Additional advantages GIS provides include more timely data collection and increased overall productivity (Harrington, 2003).
GIS provides IC commanders with the ability to download data files directly with a low error rate, and saves time because information transfer is often instantaneous, requiring little or no paperwork (Harrington, 2003). IC commanders can log data regarding safety hazards and map them at a quicker, more efficient pace. Emergency crews can subsequently be warned of dangers and directed toward safe alternatives more quickly, thus saving time and potentially aiding in the swifter resolution of an emergency.
The Incident Command System (ICS) is built to be flexible and modular in design so that responders can address a situation appropriately. Thus, the best type of decision-making for Incident Commanders during a disaster is a flexible style. The use of GIS is compatible with different styles of decision-making and should be accommodating to all of them. Typically, a small incident can be handled solely by an Incident Commander, who can develop an initial action plan independently without the benefit of advanced technologies such as GIS. However, use of GIS even in this situation — where the decision-making style is likely to be authoritative — can still be of benefit to the IC and team.
If the disaster or emergency is a much larger-scale incident, GIS will provide the information necessary for the IC to begin breaking down tasks and delegating responsibilities. It will enable the IC to determine whether one person handles medical coordination, another handles extrication, and another manages communications. The IC can expand command structure to meet the size of the incident. The type of decision-making best associated with use of such equipment should therefore be flexible decision-making.
Flexibility of decision-making is important because the unique needs of people and a situation will vary based on the scope and nature of a disaster. In certain circumstances, an IC may need to be directive or authoritative, and GIS should allow the IC to operate in this fashion. This may be the case in a smaller-scale disaster where most decision-making remains in the hands of the IC. However, GIS must also be responsive to more collaborative decision-making styles, so that if the commander needed to delegate, he or she could place appropriate personnel in charge of specific decisions and facilitate action. GIS will be most accommodating and useful when it can adapt based on who is using it and the context in which they are working.
You’re 92% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.