This paper evaluates China and Mexico as candidate destinations for an American company's global expansion, examining the advantages each country offers in terms of cost-efficient labor, logistics, and market size. The discussion covers the role of trade agreements such as NAFTA in facilitating U.S.–Mexico commerce, the use of joint ventures as an entry strategy in both markets, and the influence of collectivist workplace cultures on employee behavior. The paper concludes that while both destinations are compelling, their cultural, economic, political, and technological differences require careful, country-specific analysis before implementation.
The liberalization of markets and the incremental forces of globalization allow economic agents to transcend boundaries and benefit from the comparative advantage of various countries. The comparative advantage generally sought after is cost efficiency, but economic agents also encounter other advantages, such as a skilled labor force, technological developments, and the abundance of natural resources. In a context in which an American economic agent seeks to expand its business globally, two appealing destinations are China and Mexico. Each country reveals a series of advantages, as well as particular characteristics that must be carefully considered.
In terms of shared advantages, both China and Mexico offer cost-efficient labor forces. Additionally, employees in both countries have extensive experience with outsourcing operations and have developed the capacity to work productively within such arrangements. They are generally skilled and flexible. Beyond these common benefits, the two countries also reveal distinctive characteristics that set them apart from one another.
Mexico, for instance, is geographically close to the United States and therefore creates a series of logistical advantages. China, by contrast, offers the particular benefit of a very large population, which constitutes not only an efficient labor force but also a substantial consumer market where a company's products could be sold.
A first important particularity concerns the existence of trade agreements with each country. In the case of Mexico, the trade relationship between the destination country and the United States is governed by NAFTA (the North American Free Trade Agreement), under which the movement of merchandise between the two countries is not subject to taxes and tariffs (United States Department of Agriculture).
A second key element concerns the entry strategies to be implemented. In the case of both China and Mexico, the proposed entry strategy is that of a joint venture, owing to the benefits these contracts create. Particularly, they share risks and capitalize on the market and industry expertise of local economic agents. Regarding the specifics of these strategic alliances, the organizational structure would be established by the local partners, while control would be exercised jointly.
"Joint ventures recommended for risk-sharing and local expertise"
"Collectivist cultures limit individualism and union power"
China and Mexico reveal a series of arguments in favor of their selection as destinations for future global expansion programs. It must, however, be recognized that the two countries are culturally, economically, politically, and technologically different. Consequently, before actual implementation, it is necessary to conduct a more detailed analysis of each market. Additionally, the implementation plan must be adjusted to account for the unique particularities of both the Chinese and Mexican markets and industries.
You’re 68% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.