This paper analyzes the ethical standards and corporate culture of Goldman Sachs through the lens of the "Goldman Standard and Shades of Gray" case study. Drawing on insider accounts, media reporting, and research on wealth and unethical behavior, the paper argues that Goldman's relentless pursuit of profit has created a toxic internal culture that harms clients, investors, and the broader economy. The paper traces this culture from the firm's origins through its role in inflating the housing bubble, examines the wide range of parties affected by its gray-area practices, and concludes by calling for stronger ethical standards and regulatory reform to counter institutionalized greed on Wall Street.
The Goldman Standard and Shades of Gray is a case study focused on Goldman Sachs and the firm's impact on the economic system. Goldman has grown large enough that its operations are capable of affecting the structure of the banking system, stock markets, and government to a significant extent. The company is obviously profit-driven, but to a degree that borders on ruthlessness and perpetual greed. Furthermore, Goldman's culture is arguably more toxic today than it was in 2005, when the firm was involved in inflating a housing bubble that would help crash the global economy, or in 2007 and 2008, when it began desperately offloading housing-related assets to investors who had not yet realized the market was going to collapse. If there was a meaningful culture change, it likely came when Goldman went public a decade prior — not in the aftermath of a financial crisis that nearly wiped the firm out (Klein, 2012).
Goldman's strategies — which appear to balance long-term greed with short-term greed — raise serious questions about the firm's ethical standards, or lack thereof. The company was founded by Marcus Goldman and Samuel Sachs in 1869 and was originally intended to provide loans to small businesses; instead, Goldman pivoted aggressively toward investments. The drive for pure profitability has led the company down a path of greed and fostered a toxic internal culture.
The central problem under investigation is the ethical relationship between the company and its investors, and the price those investors pay. Greg Smith, a former Goldman executive, stated: "I attend derivatives sales meetings where not one single minute is spent asking questions about how we can help clients. It's purely about how we can make the most possible money off of them." Smith added, "It makes me ill how callously people talk about ripping their clients off. Over the last 12 months I have seen five different managing directors refer to their own clients as 'muppets,' sometimes in internal e-mails" (Hamilton, 2012). This pattern of financial misconduct illustrates the depth of the cultural problem within the firm.
Several areas were affected by Goldman's model of greed, producing outcomes that fall into ethically ambiguous gray areas. Among those impacted were:
This list represents only a small fraction of Goldman's broader impact. The better question, perhaps, is what Goldman did not affect. Virtually the entire global economy was either directly or indirectly touched by these strategies and gray areas.
Yet this strategy has paid handsomely for those at the top. While most people were celebrating New Year's Eve in 2012, Goldman's legal team was pushing send on ten regulatory filings to the Securities and Exchange Commission. By the time the ball dropped in Times Square, regulators had been notified that $65 million in Goldman stock had been granted a month early — helping a cluster of powerful multimillionaire executives trim their tax bills. Individuals such as CEO Lloyd Blankfein, COO Gary Cohn, and CFO David Viniar each received $8.4 million in Goldman stock as a result (Antilla, 2013).
"Broad range of parties harmed by Goldman's strategies"
Hamilton, W. (2012, March 14). Exiting Goldman Sachs exec blasts firm's 'toxic,' greedy culture. Retrieved from LA Times: http://articles.latimes.com/2012/mar/14/business/la-fi-mo-goldman-greedy-20120314
Keltner, D., & Piff, P. (2012, March 16). Greed prevents good. Retrieved from The New York Times: http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2012/03/15/does-morality-have-a-place-on-wall-street/greed-on-wall-street-prevents-good-from-happening
Klein, E. (2012, March 15). At Goldman, short-term greed vs. long-term greed. Retrieved from The Washington Post: http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/post/at-goldman-short-term-greed-vs-long-term-greed/2011/08/25/gIQAxFhhES_blog.html
You’re 70% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.