Guillermo Furniture Store Capital Budgeting Analysis
This paper analyzes three strategic alternatives available to Guillermo Furniture Store, a company facing rising labor costs and intensifying foreign competition. Using the company's weighted average cost of capital (WACC) of approximately 8% as a discount rate, the paper calculates net present values (NPV) for two active alternatives: investing in enhanced high-tech production equipment and becoming a broker for a foreign competitor. A sensitivity analysis tests how changes in key variables affect each option's attractiveness. The paper concludes that the enhanced production option, with an NPV of approximately $1.70 million, is the superior choice from both a financial and strategic standpoint.
- Introduction: Guillermo's Competitive Challenges: Rising costs and foreign competition threaten Guillermo's business
- Weighted Average Cost of Capital: WACC calculated at approximately 8% discount rate
- Net Present Value of Each Alternative: NPV compared across three strategic alternatives
- Sensitivity Analysis: Key variables tested to validate NPV conclusions
- Recommendation: Enhanced production option recommended on financial and strategic grounds
- Appendix: NPV Calculations: Detailed cash flow tables for both active alternatives
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- It follows a clear, logical capital budgeting framework: establish the discount rate, calculate NPVs, test with sensitivity analysis, then recommend — a disciplined sequence that mirrors real-world financial decision-making.
- The paper pairs quantitative financial analysis with brief strategic commentary, showing that investment decisions should not rest on numbers alone.
- The conservative rounding of WACC from 7.34% to 8% is explicitly justified, demonstrating an understanding of prudent assumptions in capital budgeting.
- Appendix tables are referenced throughout the body, keeping prose concise while preserving the full numerical record.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates sensitivity analysis as a validation step after NPV calculation. Rather than treating a single NPV result as definitive, the author tests how the conclusions shift under different assumptions — discount rate changes, revenue variation, and cost differences — showing that the recommended option is robust, not just marginally better.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a context paragraph establishing the business problem, then moves through four analytical sections: WACC derivation, NPV comparison of three alternatives, sensitivity analysis, and a final recommendation. Detailed cash flow tables are placed in an appendix, keeping the main argument readable. The structure is appropriate for a short financial case analysis at the undergraduate business level.
Introduction: Guillermo's Competitive Challenges
Guillermo Furniture Store is facing a difficult operating environment. The cost of labor — a key input — is increasing rapidly, and the company is facing intense competition from a foreign competitor that has the ability to undercut Guillermo's low-end lines with better-quality goods. In order to save his business, Guillermo has identified three different strategic alternatives and is subjecting them to financial analysis. The results of the financial analysis will be combined with a strategic assessment in order to determine the best path forward for the company.
Weighted Average Cost of Capital
Since Guillermo is going to use a net present value (NPV) analysis to help guide his decision, the first step is to determine the company's cost of capital. The three alternatives are substantially different from one another, and because they each carry a different risk profile, there is an argument to be made that each should be evaluated with a project-specific discount rate. However, to simplify the process, Guillermo will use the company's weighted average cost of capital (WACC) as his discount rate.
The cost of equity is 10% with a weight of 53%. The cost of debt is 7.5% with a weight of 47%, and the applicable tax rate is 42%. The weighted average cost of capital is therefore calculated as follows:
WACC = (.53)(10) + (.47)(7.5)(.58)
WACC = 5.3 + 2.0445 = 7.3445%
This figure can be rounded up to 8% in the interests of being conservative, which is always a recommended approach when performing capital budgeting analysis on major projects. Rounding up ensures that the decision is not made on the basis of overly optimistic assumptions.
Net Present Value of Each Alternative
The first alternative is to invest in new production technology. This investment would make Guillermo competitive with its foreign competitor and allow the company to win back some of the market share it has lost. Based on the cash flows presented in the appendix, this option has a net present value of approximately $1.703 million. Strategically, this option addresses both of the major issues affecting the company's profitability: the new equipment would dramatically lower labor costs, while simultaneously reducing total production costs and improving product quality.
The second alternative is for Guillermo to become a broker for its high-tech foreign competitor. This option — sometimes characterized as a "if you can't beat them, join them" approach — involves Guillermo admitting that directly matching the competitor's capabilities would be difficult, and instead helping the competitor gain access to the North American market. Based on the cash flows in the appendix, this option has a net present value of approximately $1.596 million, which is somewhat lower than the enhanced production alternative.
The third option is the "do-nothing" alternative. Because the business is in decline and the external environment is challenging on multiple levels, this option is by far the least attractive and the least likely to be profitable over time. It is not subjected to further detailed NPV analysis.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.